Social cognition Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

social cognition

A

we looking for the social world,our interactions with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

theory of mind

A

the ability to think about mental states in ourselves and others,understanding that mental states influence behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

key points

A
  • must understand that people have mental states

-must understand that other’s mental states can differ from your own

-must understand that mental states guide behaviour (regardless of weather those mental states are acurate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

false belif: sally -anne task

A

children fail this tesk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

false belifs:smarties task

A

fail the test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

theory of mind tests

A

children under4 years ‘‘fail’‘on traditional false belifs tasks

children 4-5+ pass tradional false belif tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

questions

A

do children really not have a theory of mind until 4?

false belif tasks too hard?

many studies show resoning about mental states earlier in development (18 months)

baby seem to respond to false belif when seeing someone having true belif vs false belif

infants can suceed even at false belif tasks that us different methods(easier)-look more not languague

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what causes developments in theory mind?

A

-Theory theory> change in thinking,#

-simulation theory> use imagination,role-taking etc.

-modular theory>brain maturation

-or,just explained by development of other skills(like being able to multifanction)/ exacutive fanction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

influences on theory of mind

A

-individual differences
-number of siblings(having more and
older sibling)
-pretend play
-parenting

-languague(better languague skills and biolenguanism) seem to improve theory of mind

-autism:have some issues with theory of mind and false belif

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

social cognition

A

Understanding and
thinking about mental
states, and how
mental states guide
behaviour

Understanding and
thinking about social
groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

we group people

A

-to survive who is within and whithout my group

-to become less overwheld about new information

-to understand more our world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

social groups

A

-race
-ethinicity
-age
-religion
-carrer
-major
-nationlity
-gender
-sexuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

understanding of race

A

infants: prefer familar race faces,respond to race as perceptual category

by 3-4 years:can explicity characterized race(people with that race),reason about skin color as stable characteristics

Later in development: start reasoning about race as a stable and informative features of identity(they are white so they are ….funny)- racialized children shows this understanding earlier on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

attitudes towards race

A

explicit attitudes:attitudes a pearson consciously endorses and can report

in dominant racial group > in-group positivity + out-group negatively(it declines with development)-in dominant groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when we get older

A

we express less in-group positivetly/preference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

in marginilize racial groups?

A

-clarks doll study
-less in-group positivity
-increses with development

17
Q

dominant bs non-dominant group

A

dominant-negatively related (the more they grow the less they are positive-ingroup belif)

non-dominant-positively releted(the more they grow better they see their in-group)

18
Q

why is that-explicit bias

A

maybe dominant groups learned that it is not execeptable to say they prefer their own group

19
Q

Explicit bias

A

-can be expressed directly
-aware of bias
-can delibertely acess
-easyli controled

ex:i say that i hate apples because they are bad

20
Q

implicit bias

A

-belifs,attitudes that are activated in response to social cues

-may have less awarness

-may be more difficult to control

ex: i have a bow of fruit (apples and bananas) and decide to eat a banana

21
Q

method of studying implicit biases(IAT)

A

-measures the strenghth of association between concepts(ex:race) and attribute(evaluation-good vs bad)

-response time: faster responses suggest a strong association

22
Q

some worry of using this method

A

-Order effect- in proper use of IAT,should be counterbalance,ALSO typically found not to have an impact

-Reliablility-can be impacted by context scores do vary from one test to the next.BUT over several tests,farly reliable

-Meaningful? - is predictive pf behaviour in avarage for an overall group,BUT predictions are small(it predicts groups not individuals)

it is not a diagnose

23
Q

in implicit bias

A

individuals from dominant racial groups> positive in-group bias

24
Q

what happens across development?

A

-there is no difference between ages

-which is different from the explicit bias study that implied that as we get older we get less bias

25
what about individual from non-dominant groups?(implicit bias)
there is no in-group preferences, no out-group preference no preference in general
26
what leads to biases/attitudes about race
ingroup bias(to survive) inbuilt bias + social norms:social/cultaral evaluation of dominance(media)-authority figures helps= attitudes about race
27
what about bi-multi-racial individual?
in adults: in between a bit of pro-whitness bias but not too huge or in the same levels as just whites-both implicit and explicit
28
minimal group paradime
a type of study where the difference between group is minimum and see if they have any in-group bias Ex:blue shirt vs red shirt happens so rapidly /automatic
29
-what work in adults to reduce intergroup biases:
-personal contact with out-group menber -encountering positive examples of out-group menbers
30
gonzales study
31
reserch question
Can children’s implicit biases be reduced through exposure to counter-stereotypical examples? participants:White and Asian children aged 5- 12
32
method
Exposed to positive examples of either White individuals, Black individuals, or flowers (control) after they had to complete a IAT test
33
results:
all young kids :they showed pro-white bias regardless of examples older kids: kids who were showed positive examples of black individual didnt show a pro-white bias, it also didnt show a pro-black bias either.they show no bias either way!
34
limitation
-it was only tested in a shor-term effect futher reserch should be made about long-term effect -ethical concerns -does this change behaviour?
35
ampplications of these findings and impplications
that racial bias can be minimized if we show to children in tv shows,films,shools positive eaxmples of children of the races that are seen negatively are older children more malible maybe less egocentric?
36
37