Social Cognition Flashcards

1
Q

What is social cognition and why is it studied?

A
  • Social cognition is  how people make sense of the social world with emphasis on cognitive processes
  • Cognitive processes lay basis for social psychology research
    • Understanding social cognition allows us to anticipate and combat negative social behaviour
      • Eg Conspiracy theories (moon landing, Barak Obama birth)
  • Lessons from social cognition
    • People create their own reality
    • Situational cues can have powerful effects on our thoughts, feelings, and behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three models of social thinkers?

A
  • The Naive Scientist: we go around the world gathering evidence to test our hypotheses
    • Eg Obama: Where’s the birth certificate, is it real, is there corroborating evidence, where can more information be found?
    • But this is effortful and time consuming (uncommon)
  • The Cognitive Miser: lack of time for scientist approach - do as little thinking as possible and use heuristics instead
    • Eg Obama: experts say he is born in US, my friends believe X
  • The Motivated Tactician: choose cognitive strategies (eg above 2) based on motivations/goals
    • Motivated scepticism: only sceptical of evidence when the conclusion is unpalatable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What factors separate automatic and controlled processes?

A
  • Original criteria for automaticity:
    • Intentionality: Is an act of will necessary to set the process in motion?
    • Awareness: Is one consciously aware of the process?
    • Controllability: Is one able to stop the process once it is operating?
    • Efficiency: How much attentional resources does the process take?
      • Eg Reading text in front of you, as illustrated by stroop task
  • Current definition
    • behaviours can be partially automatic, or only automatic in certain situations
    • Not all four criteria need to be met
      • eg Driving
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the Priming effect and Priming techniques?

A
  • Priming effect: The unintended influence of prior experience on judgment, thought, or behaviour
  • Priming Technique:  The presentation of a stimulus that activates a concept in memory
    • Awareness is important: people cannot be aware of the priming technique. can be avoided by using subliminal messaging
    • Not all people are affected by priming: the stimulus must be relevant to the individual, and stereotypical of the target
  • Example Rating Donald
    • Priming subjects with passages related to “reckless” or “adventurous”
    •  Participants primed with “reckless” rated Donald more negatively than participants primed with “adventurous”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did Banaji et al. demonstrate that primes must be stereotypically related to the target to be effective?

A
  • Rating Donald or Donna:
    • Experiment A (aggression)
      • Priming “aggression” or neutral (via gender ambivalent sentence scramble).
      • Then read passage about either man (donald) or woman (donna)
      • No difference in female rating, effect of prime present in male rating
    • Experiment B (dependance)
      • Priming dependence or neutral, otherwise same design
      • Prime only had effect for Donna
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the experiment conducted by Mckenzie-Mohr and Zanna on the effect of pornography priming?

A
  • Effect of Pornography: McKenzie-Mohr & Zanna Only certain men are effected by the priming.
    • Men completed BEM sex; 30 androgenous, 30 macho
    • Priming watched either (non-violent) porno or parliament question time
    • Subsequent interview with attractive women
      • Rating of sexual motivation: prime/macho higher, no other effect
      • Interpersonal distance: androgenous no effect, macho high prime effect
    • Given time to recount interview
      • Primed macho men recalled significantly more information about the physical appearance of interviewer. No effect on androgenous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the experiment by Rudman and Borgida show about the effect of sexist ads on social priming?

A
  •  Macho or androgynous men watched sexualised or non-sexualised ads
    • Completed a Lexical decision task:
      • Reaction time to responses eg “babe” vs “sister”
      • Sexualised prime: slower response to non-sex object words. Those primed non-sexual: reverse effect
      • No effect of androgenous or macho
    • Interviewed a woman,
      • had to choose between pairs of questions to ask the woman
      • Sexualised prime: sat closer to interviewee, asked sexual questions, rated employee as less competent
      • consistent across androgenou & macho
  • Androgenousmacho men react the same
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Yao et al find about the effect of sexualised video games on social behaviour?

A
  • Lexical decision task on sexual vs non-sexual female words
    • Leisure Suit Larry: strong effect
    • Sims2, Pacman: no effect
  • Note: didnt look at subtypes of men
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is self-regulation and how is it helpful?

A
  • Bringing behaviour, thoughts, emotions into line with desired outcomes
    •  requires monitoring, resisting alternatives, keeping focus
  • Localisation in brain?  Prefrontal cortex (Phineas Gage)
  • Self-regulation promotes Delay of gratification
    • Delayed gratification in kids predicts success in schooling
    • Adult self-rated self control associated with success
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Wegner’s Ironic Process Theory?

A
  • Proposed by Wegner to explain the effect of thinking more about something you dont want to think about
  • Mental control is achieved through two processes which work hand in hand
    • Intentional operating process: searches for distracters
      • conscious, effortful, and interruptible
      • Can be affected by depleted resources (tiredness)
    • Ironic monitoring process: used to monitor whether the to-be-suppressed thought is resurfacing
      • unconscious, less effortful, and uninterruptible
  • Ironic monitoring continuous regardless of fatigue, but intentional operating will be affected and not block it out - continued resurfacing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did Wegner’s “Putt and the Pendulum” studies support the Ironic Processes Theory?

A
  • Study 1: Putt putt golf challenge
    • Cognitive load condition: need to remember 8 digit number
  • Study 2: Don’t let the pendulum swing sideways
    • Cognitive load condition: count back from 1000 in 3s
  • Findings:
    • Rebound effects for cognitive load
      • ended up doing it even more - overshoot target or swing in sideways motion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Ego-depletion/Strength Model of Self-regulation?

A
  • Self regulation is like a muscle:
    • Relies on a limited energy source
    • Consumed by use (ego depletion)
    • Can be strengthened with “exercise”
  • Ego depletion is NOT domain specific (use of resources in one area will affect other “unrelated” areas)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is some empirical evidence for Ego depletion?

A
  • Baumeister et al. Hungry participants (instructed to skip a meal):
    • 3 conditions: Resist chocolate cookie, resist radishes, control
    • Then told to do an unsolvable puzzle measured persistence time
    • Results: chocolate chip (8mins) less than other two groups (20mins)
  • Muraven  Effects of suppressing thoughts of a white bear
    • subsequent driving task effected
  • Vohs effects of decision making
    • Participants who made many choices drank less of a bad tasting “health drink” they were being paid to consume
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is some evidence that exercising can increase self control?

A
  • Oaten and Cheng longitudinal study of university students
    • Control phase (2 months) then exercise program phase (2 months) (not already physically active)
    • Measured DVs at baseline, 1month and 2months
      • Performance on a visual tracking task while ignoring video
      • Self-reported self-regulatory behaviours
  • Results:
    • Self report: self reported better healthy behaviours (junk food, healthy eating) also reported increases in no health related behaviours (impulse spending, temper, procrastination)
    • Visual tracking: performance 2m >1m>baseline
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is affect and and its effects on behaviours?

A
  • Affect is our current emotions and moods
    • reciprocally related with cognition (thought shapes feelings, feelings shape thought)
    • Affect can effect memory, judgments/inferences, and information processing strategies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the difference between mood-congruent and mood-dependent memory?

A
  •  Mood-congruent memory:
    • recall memories that are congruent with current mood
    • moods serve as a filter
    • eg. you met sarah when in a good mood, you remember good things about sarah
  • Mood-dependent memory:
    • fit between mood at retrieval and mood at encoding
    • moods serve as a retrieval cue
    • eg. you met sarah when in a good mood, sarah comes to mind the next time you are in a good mood
17
Q

What is Bower’s network theory of affect?

A
  • Affect as Priming = nodes in a semantic network, Mood as a source of priming
    • eg “Happy” is a central node linked to memories of positive effects -
    • once activation of paths reaches a threshold you become that mood
  • Relation to mood dependent memory: when new info is learned it is linked to the mood node active at the time. That mood then acts to activate that info.
  • Relation to mood congruent memory: Being in a mood leads to retrieval of info associated with this mood. Mood then serves as a filter to what you pay attention to and remember (within that network only)
  • Mood affecting judgement: Moods influence memory processes which influence judgement
18
Q

What is Swartz and Clore’s theory that feelings can be a direct source of information to affect judgement?

A
  • Swartz and Clore: We may use our mood as a direct source of information
    • When you encounter something or someone, you use your existing affective state to construct a response
    • Potential source of error, however, when mood is irrelevant to target of judgment (eg conditioning with chocolate bar)
  • Contrast to Bower Priming/Network
    • for direct source: Impact of affective states on judgment depends on perceived information value, attribution of emotion to cause
    • Bower: informational value should not matter
19
Q

What is the evidence that people evaluate the value of their emotions for judgement?

A
  • Source of disagreement between two models of mood effects (network vs direct model) is whether people place value judgement on mood when making judgement
  • Schwarz & Clore Weather effects
    • Asked people either on sunny or rainy weekends how satisfied they are with their lives on the whole
    • Some people where asked first - how’s the weather where you are
    • Results:
      • No weather priming: weather affected judgement
      • Weather primed: no difference in life satisfaction
  • So people use feelings, unless specifically cued to think that feelings may not be appropriate
20
Q

How can mood effect the processing strategies that we adopt? What evidence is there for this?

A
  • Emotions exist to guide responses to the current environment
    • Negative emotions: promote action to solve problem, promotes detail oriented systematic programming
    • Positive emotions: promotes use of heuristics
  • Study 1: Mood and Correspondance bias
    • Read essays on topical issues, being told whether authors chose or were assigned topic
    • Sad condition lower correspondance bias, happy higher rates
    • Sad condition remembered more information
  • Study 2: Stereotyping
    • After priming, read ambiguous description of assault case defendant, varied as either latino or caucasian and asked for verdict
    • Happy participants relied on stereotypes, whereas neutral participants based judgments on the evidence provided
21
Q
A