social influence Flashcards

(155 cards)

1
Q

what is social influence

A

the process by which an individuals attitudes, beliefs or behaviours are modified by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others
includes conformity obediance and minority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is conformity (majority influence)

A

the tendancy to change our behaviour/beliefs/attitudes in response to the influence of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is obediance

A

where an individual complies with a direct order from a figure with percieved authority
individuals respond in a way they wouldnt have done without the order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

types of conformity

A

compliance
identification
internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

compliance

A

conforms publically with the views/behaviours of others- but privately disagrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

identification

A

adopts the views of a group publically and privately because they identify with the group and feel a sense of membership
may only be temporary- not maintained once left the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

internalisation

A

conversion-true change of private views to match those of the group
new attitudes/behaviuors become part of the individuals value system- not dependent on the presence of the group
the change is long term/more permanent than the other types of conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the two explanations of conformity

A

normative social influence
informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

normative social influence

A

desire to be liked
desire for the approval of others and to be accepted
often results in compliance only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

informational social influence

A

desire to be right
look to others to give us information about how to behave/think
particularly in new or ambiguos situtaions
may result in identification or internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

who did research studies into conformity

A

Asch 1951
Sherif 1935

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how did sherif investigate conformity

A

autokinetic effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the autokinetic effect

A

where in a completely dark room a stationary pinpoint of light appears to move and the amount it appers to move by depends on the individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the procedure of sherifs study

A

individuals asked on their own how much the light moved and then asked in groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what were the findings of sherifs study

A

peoples perception of the amount the light moved conformed to a group norm when they were asked together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why was sherifs study criticised

A

task was ambiguous
there was no right answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what was the aim of aschs study

A

to see if individuals would conform to a majority when presented with an unambigous task (clear right/wrong answer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

method of aschs conformity study

A

recruited 123 male participants
asked them to participate in a visual perception task
one naive geniune p placed in a group of 7-9 others who were all confederates
there was one standard test line andthen three comparison lines of differing lengths shown
ps had to say which comparison line matched the standard line- correct answer always obvious
confederates gave same wrong answer unanimously on 12 of the 18 trials- called critical trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what were the findings of aschs experiment

A

26% never conformed giving correct answer on all 12 trials
74% conformed to the incorrect answer at least once
participants answered correctly 99% of the time when there was no group pressure
5% of participants conformed on every critical trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what was found during debriefs of aschs experiment

A

some ps said they didnt want to upset the experimenter and wanted to convey a favourable impression
some ps said they doubted themselves and thought their perceptions were innacurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what were the conclusions from aschs experiment

A

individuals conform for different reasons:
normative si- to avoid rejection
informational- doubt own judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

criticisms of aschs conformity study

A

all male participants
lacks ecological validity
possibly unethical, make participants feel uncomfotable/stress/less confident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what variables affect conformity

A

group size
unanimity
task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

how did asch research the effect of group size on conformity

A

manipulated the size of the group of confederates- 1,2,3,4,8,10 and 15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what did asch find from his research into the effect of group size on conformity
conformity increased as the number of confederates increased from 1-3 but after group size made no difference in some conditions group sizes of 15 confederates led to lower levels of conformity- maybe as ps become more suspicious when faced with a larger majority
26
what did Bond find in relation to the effect of group size on conformity
replications supported asch group size rapidly reached a plateau meta analysis by Bond (2005) found conformity was similar with majority sizes of 3,4,5,6, or 7
27
how does whether the response is given publically or privately affect group size and conformity
Bond 2005 found when ps could give their response privately there was a small negative relationship between conformity and group size
28
what did Asch find about the effect of unanimity on conformity
conformity most likely when confederates are unanimous in their answers asch found one confederate is instructed to disagree with the majority judgement and give the correct answer on every trial conformity decreased from 37% of critical trials down to 5.5%
29
for what two reasosns did asch say the presence of a dissenter led to a decrease in conformity
the dissenter provides useful information about the correct response and reduces the need for group social approval
30
what did aschs research into task difficulty and its effect on conformity find
if the task is difficult- comparison lines all similar in length to the standard line then conformity increases
31
what did Lucas 2006 find about task difficulty and conformity
gave students easy and hard maths problems and found greater level of conformity when problems were hard especially if participants doybted their mathematical abilities
32
how do individual differences affect conformity
conformity high for people who have low self esteem, are concerned about social relationships, have a strong need for social approval and are attracted towardss other group members conformity lower for those with high levels of self efficacy (confidence in own abilities) and higher for those with low self efficacy
33
how are aschs and sherifs studies limited by ecological validity
laboratory experiments situation is artificial and tasks are unreal so can results of experiments be generalised to everyday life lacks ecological validity- extent to which research findings can be generalised to other settings
34
how can aschs and sherifs research be evaluated in terms of temporal validity
experiments conducted in early 1950s USA high levels of cinformity in aschs research was seen as a reflection of 1950s american society by some was a time when non conformity was discourafed
35
what Nicholson 1985 find that showed limitations of the temporal validity of aschs experiment
replicated aschs experiment and found lower conformity levels may be due to changes in american society but also differences in samples
36
ethical issues in aschs experiment
deception as they arent informed about the real aim of the task- were told it was about visual percpetion- means ps didnt really consent confidence could be affected embarrasment
37
how can aschs research be defended in terms of ethics
if ps told real aim and procedure there wouldve been a lack of internak validity debriefed ps after
38
how does Aschs study show normative social influence
the correct answer was obvious- yet indivudals conformed to the wrong answer confirmed in debriefing interviews they knew they were giving the wrong answer but didnt want to be in minority of group and stand out indicated compliance and desire to fit in and therefore suggests NSI
39
how does Sherifs research indicate informational social influence
sherifs study was an ambigous task with no obvious right answer in ambigous situations individuals look to others as a guide- likely to show informational social influence
40
what did abrams find about normative social influence
presence of in group results in higher conformity than outgroup presence supports nsi- as would have greater desire for acceptance from in group if it was isl- would be no difference between in group and out group
41
when are people most likely to conform to normative social influence according to Latane's social impact theory
when group membership is important to us Perrin and Spencer 1981 found unemployed black youths from a racially tense part of London were more likely to conform to a majority if other black youths when experimenter was white
42
how can normaive social influence be evaluated- real world application
give insight to why isome children begin bullying other children when they are uncomfortable with the behaviour Garandau and Cillessen 2006 found children who had greater need for social acceptance were the most likely to comply to pressure exerted by a bullying group to victimise another child by conforming to the actions of the bullying group, these children believed they would be accepted by other group members and so could maintain friendships regardless of how they felt in private about bullying
43
when are people most likely to conform to informational social influence
situational ambiguity in an emergency we might not have time to think calmly so we look to others for the best course of action we are more likely to conform if we believe the majority has more expertise or knowledge about the task
44
what did Allen 1980 suggest about when we are most likely to conform
suggested intelligence was a major determining factor of conformity to informational social influence with intelligent individuals being more self confident and less likely to conform
45
what are social roles
the behaviours expected of an individual who occupies a given social position or status
46
what research investigated conformity to social roles
Zimbardos stanford prison study
47
what hypothesis was zimbardo testing
the dispositional (personality) vs situational hypothesis to explain prison behaviour
48
deindividualisation
the process of loosing ones sense of self, often associated with group/mob behaviour
49
dehumanisation
the denial of full humaneness to others- enables aggression and mistreatment of others
50
aim of zimbardos prison experiment
to investigate whether brutality reported among guards in american prisons at the time was due to sadistic personalities of the guards (dispositional hypothesis) or to do with the power structure in the prison environment (situational hypothesis)
51
precoedure of the stanford prison experiment
male ps recruited through newspaper advertisements psychological tests used to select those who appeared most stable with no voilent or antisocial tendancies from 75 volunteers, 24 well adjusted healthy male students were selected study was a two week role play simulation study of prison life in a mock prison participants observed by hidden cameras randomly allocated to guard or prisoner role prisoners ''arrested'' at homes without warning, charged, read their rights, searched, handcuffed and taken to police station stripped, deloused and given prison number confined to cells apart from meals, work and toilet privelages guards whore military style khaki uniforms reflector sunglasses, carried wooden batons guards on duty 24 hours a day working 8 hour shifts instructed to keep prisoners under conrtol but no physical aggression permitted
52
what were the findings of prisoners from the zimbardo experiment
prisoners rebelled against guards after two days, guards quelled rebellion using fire extinguishers after this prisoners became submissive and subdued some prisoners had to be released early due to extreme reactions (severe emotional disturbance, rage, disorganised thinking, acute anxiety and depression) eg one prisoner had ro be released after less than 36 hours
53
zimbardo experiment findings of the guards
use of force, harrassment and aggression by guards increased steadily guards conformed to percieved roles with zeal, harrassing the prisoners so much the study had to be discontinued after 6 days individual differences in guards behaviour 1/3 became tyrannical in arbitrary use of power some were 'good guards' who didnt degrade or harrass prisoners
54
conclusions of the stanford prison experiment
behaviour observed was due to situational variabes rather than individuals personalities (disposition) with participants conforming to expected forms of behaviour for the roles of prisoner and guard, demonstrating conformity by identification some findings could be explained as a result of deindividuation as some features of experiment eg uniforms, reflector sunglasses would encourage deindividuation by increasing feelings of anonymity and aggression
55
how can stanford prison experiment be evaluated by the fact conformity to roles isnt automatic
zimbardo assumed the guards drift into sadistic behaviour was an utomatic consequence of them conforming to their role however there were individual differences between guards- some guards became tyrannical whilst others didnt individual differences are inconsistent with an entirely situational explanation for guards behaviour and suggest conformity to roles isnt automatic with participants choosing how to respond to the situation rather than blindly conforming to their social role
56
what did Banuazizi and Movahedi 1975 say about demand charachteristics and participant reactivity in the stanford prison experiment
argued behaviour of zimbardos guards and prisoners wasnt due to the 'prisoner environment' but was a response to the powerful demand charachteristics in the experimental situation this can result in participant effects/reactivity where ps change their behaviour as a result of these percieved expectations the mock prison was v different from a real prison ps knew they hadnt committed a crime and were free to leave led to researchers suggestibf the artifical setting resulted in ps demonstrating participant reactivity with prisoners and guards play acting
57
what are demand charachteristics
those aspects of a study that lead ps to guess what the experimenters expect of them or how they want them to behave
58
what is obedience
the type of social influence where an individual complies witj a direct order from a figure with percieved authority it is implied that the person receiving the order responds in a way they wouldnt have done without the order
59
who did research into obediance
milgram
60
what was the aim of milgrams experiment
to find out whether ordinary americans would obey an unjust order from an authority figure to inflict pain on another person milgram wanted to discover what factors in a situation led people to obey
61
precedure for milgrams experiment
40 male volunteers selected and each paid $4.50 ps told the study concerned the role of punishment in learning (not told real aim of testing obediance to authority) roles of experimenter teacher and learner geniune p was always the teacher confederate was the learner teacher decieved into thinking they were giving electric shocks when none were actually administered teacher had to administer a shock evrry time learner made a mistake p watched confederate being strapped to a chair with electrode attached to their arm shocks given started at 15v and rose in 15v to 450v if p hesitated the researcher encouraged him to continue experiment continued until teacher refused to continue or until 450v were reached 4 times p then debriefed
62
findings of milgrams experiment
65% of participants went on giving shocks up to and including 450V all ps gave shocks up to 300v only 12.5% of ps stopped at 300v
63
what did milgram find in interviews following his experiment
74% of participants learned something of personal importance as a result of being in the study 84% of participants said they were glad to have participated only 1 person regretted taking part
64
conclusions from milgrams study
people will obey an authority fugure even when the order would result in harming someone else they dont demonstrate unquestioning obedience though- they are in a state of conflict- despite this they obey anyway indicates we have a strange tendancy to obey authority figures even when it is against our better judgement
65
criticisms of milgrams study
issues with deception- dont have informed consent issues with temporal and cultural validity some people had a seizure as a conseuqnece of the stress-ethical issues, harm to participants
66
what are the two ways in which obediance can be evaluated
validity ethics
67
how can milgrams study lack internal validity
suggested a lack of experimental realism and presence of demand charachteristics anf argued participants couldnt have believed in the investigation- as experiment was carried out at a prestigous uni so participants couldnt have believed they were giving real shocks- would assume the uni wouldnt allow them to harm participants, therefore ps were just demonstrating demand charachteristics
68
how can milgraams research be defended and indicate there is internal validity
ps didnt obey unqustioningly- they were conflicted ps experienced high levels of stress- would suggest they believed they were giving real shocks
69
arguments suggesting a lack of external validity in milgrams study
lab study artificial setting- not asked to administer electric shocks every day (lacks mundane realism) yale university- may not be able to generalise to other settings
70
arguments suggesting there is external validity in milgrams study
replication in alternative setting (run down office) still produced obedience field experiments eg hofling still demonstrated high levels of obediance to authority natural settings where harm could be inflicted
71
how was deecption an issue in milgrams research and what is the defence for it
deception- werent told the real aim of the experiment, meant they didnt have informed consent if they told them the aim then this may have caused ps to act a certain way
72
what are ethical issues in milgrams research and how can they be defended
participants experienced high levels of stress such as tremble, sweat, stutter, biting their lips- argues there was 'informed consent'- couldnt properly be informed of this and the long term effects could be detramental loss of self esteem-willingness to deliver electric shocks to helpless fellow participants- participants were debriefed after- make sure they were unharmed and understood
73
what situational variables affect obediance
proximity location uniform
74
how did milgram investigate effect of proximity on obediance
milgrams variations teacher-learner proximity original experiment- teacher and learner in separate rooms amd couldnt see each other increased orximity in two variations 1- teacher and learner in same room 46cm apart 2- teacher had to place learners hand on shock plate increasing proximity also serves to remove ''buffers''
75
what did milgram find the effects were of proximity on obedience
milgrams original study had the buffer of the teacher and learner being in seperate rooms- leading to a very high level of obediance 100% went up to 300v 65% went up to 450v increased proximity and and removal of buffers led to lower levels of obedience of those going up to 450v 40%- teacher and learner in the same room (high proximity) 30%- teacher forces hand on the shock plate (high proximity)
76
what did milgram find was the affect of location on obediance
milgram carried out a replication of his original study in a run down office obediance rates up to 450v original study-65% run down office-48% drop in obediance occured because of: perception of legitimate authority milgram- in the lab setting the experimenter would seem to have legitimate authority- but in the run down office the legitimate authority may be questioned
77
who investigated the effect of uniform on obediance
bickman 1974 field experiment
78
what did bickman find about the effect of uniform on obedience
bickmans study of obedience found higher rates of obedience to an individual in a guards uniform compared to other types of dress eg the experimenter asked participants to lend money to someone obediance rates when experimenter was dressed in: ordinary clothes-49% guards uniform-92% this occurs because the uniform communicates legitimate authority- a factor associated with encouraging obedience
79
what is legitimate authority
the perception of the authority figure as being 'legitimate' increases obedience
80
what are non dispositional explanations of obedience
situational variables-proximity,location and uniform legitimate authority agentic state
81
agentic state explanation of obedience
milgram argued one explanation for high level of obedience to authority was explanation of participants operating in the agentic state he argued individuals operate at two levels in social situations
82
what did milgram say the two levels are in social situations that individuals operate at
autonomous state agentic state
83
autonomous state
where individual is aware of the consequences of their actions and choose voluntarily tobehave in particular ways, accpeting responsibility for their behaviour
84
agentic state
where the individual see themselves as an agent (or subordinate) of another and carries out their orders without accepting personal responsibility for their actions they see the person giving orders as responsibile not themselves
85
agentic shift
the switch from operating as an autonomous individual to acting as an agent for another person usually an authority figure agentic shift is therefore more likely when there is the perception of legitimate authority
86
how does milgrams experiment provide evidence to support the agentic state
many ps had serious reservations about continuing and asked experimenter who would take full responsibility
87
what did Dambrum and Vatine 2010 find that supports the agetntic state
found ps who gave the most electric shocks in the milgram situation tended to hold the experimenter and victim responsible rather than themselves ps who gave the fewest shocks accepted personal responsibility and didnt hold the experimenter and victim responsible
88
what are dispositional explanations of obedience
authoritarian personality
89
dispositional explanations
explanations that emphasise behaviour as being caused by an individuals own personal charachteristics rather than situational influences within the environment
90
characteristics of an authoritarian personality
rigid conventional beliefs and values strict adherance to social rules and hierarchies submissive to authority figures politically conservative/right wing
91
what is the authoritarian personality
adorno argued some people have an authoritarian personality which makes them more likely to be obedient and prejudiced their adherence to social rules and conventions and their submissiveness to authority makes them more likely to be obedient to an authority figure
92
what did adorno develop to measure different components making up the authoritarian personality
the F scale sample statements- indicate whether you agree/disagree eg 'obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues children should learn' agreeing with these statements indicates an authoritarian personality
93
how did altemeyer later refine the concept of the authoritarian personality
identifying a cluster of three original personality variables and referred to thos as right wing authoritarianism
94
what three variables did altemyer identify
conventionalism authoritarian agression authoritarian submission
95
conventionalism
an adherence to conventional norms and values
96
authoritarian aggression
aggressive feelings toward people who violate these normsu
97
athoritarian submission
uncritical submissiveness to authority
98
why are individuals with an authoritarian personality obedient
adorno argued the authoritarian personality developed as a result of an individuals upbringing he found individuals with an authoritarian personality had been raised by parents with an authoritarian personality style ie strict harsh uprbinging- including use of physical punishment with a string emphasis on obedience
99
resistance to social influence
refers to resisting pressures to conform (non conformity) and resisting pressures to obey (disobedience)
100
what is anti conformity or counter conformity
when the individual acts in opposition to group norms behaviour is group dependent as individuals actions are determined by those of the group as individual does opposite to the others in the group involves a consistent movement away from social conformity
101
how is resistance to social influence different to anti conformity
resistance to social influence and therefore true independent behaviour is when the individual is not influenced by the actions or decisions of others it involves a lack of consistebt movement either towards or away from social expectancy
102
research demonstrating resistance to pressures to conform
research demonstratng conformity can be used to illustrate resistance to conformity eg asch- not everyone conformed and those that did conform didnt conform all the time
103
research demonstrating resistance to pressures to obey
research that has demonstrated obedience demonstrates resistance to obedience eg milgrams variations
104
situational factors in resistance to social influence
social support
105
social support
makes it easier to ignore orders or break rules as a group so social support can help resist the pressure to conform can increase the individuals confidence that their position/viewpoint is correct can also present an alternative way to respond to a situation
106
evidence from asch for social support
the presence of a dissenter- more likely to resist group pressure to conform conformity levels dropped from 37% of critical trials to 5.5% when recieved social support from an ally breaks the unanimity as presence of a dissenter was equally effective in reducing conformity when giving a correct or different incorrect response breaking the unanimity indicates there are alternative, legitimate ways of thinking/responding
107
what evidence did milgram find to support social support
resisting pressure to obey milgram rebel peers: disobedient models teacher paired with two other teachers- were confederates at 150v the first confederate refused to continue at 210v second confederate refused to continue found complete obedience- those going up to 450v lowered from 65% in the original study to 10%
108
situational explanations of resistance to social influence
social support - presence of dissenter - disobedient models
109
dispositional explanations of resistance to social influence
locus of control
110
dispositional factors
personal factors
111
locus of control
refers to individual differences in peoples beliefs and expectations about what controls events in their lives it relates to a persons perception of the extent of personal control they have over their own behaviour events and future
112
internal locus of control
people with an internal locus of control believe that what happens to them is largely a consequence of internal factors their own ability, effort and personal decisions- they can therefore control events in their life
113
external locus of control
people with an external locus of control tend to believe that what happens to them is controlled by external factors such as the actions of others, luck or fate they have a sense that things ''just happen to them'' and and largely uncontrollable they tend to approach things with more passive and fatalistic attitude, taking less responsibility for their actions
114
how does research evidence from Avtgis support locus of control
carried out a meta analysis of studies considering locus of control and conformity and found those who scored higher on external locus of control were more easily persuaded and likely to conform than those with a low score the average correlation was 0.37 which is statistically significant supports theory that internal locus of control leads to resisting
115
what evidence did Spector 1983 find about locus of control
measured locus of control and predisposition to normative and informational social influence in 157 undergrad students found a correlation between locus of control and predisosition to normative social influence those with external locus of control more likely to show normative si than those with internal locus of control no correlation between locus of control and informational si partial support-depends on nature of si external locus- more likely to have desire to be liked, less likely to resist si
116
what is minority influence
where people reject the established norm of the majority group members and gradually move towards the position of the minority- changing their attitudes and behaviour in line with the minority group members it involves conversion and results in the internalisation of the views of the minority
117
why does minority influence occur
being exposed to a viewpoint different to our own causes cognitive conflict this causes us to think more deeply about an issue and reappraise our perspective
118
what does conversion to the minority viewpoint require
consistency commitment flexibility
119
consistency
stability in the expressed position over time and agreement between different members of the minority
120
commitment
degree of dedication to a particular cause- suggests, confidence and courage in the face of a hostile majority we may illustrate commitment when our dedication to a cause is at some cost or inconveniance to the individual q
121
122
flexibility
a willingness to compromise when expressing a position flexibility is more effective at changing majority opinion than rigidity of arguments
123
who did a key study into minority influence
moscovici calling a blue slide green
124
what was the procedure of moscovicis study
two conditions- a consistent minority and an inconsistent minority consistent minority had 4 real ps and 2 confederates- called a blue slide green on every trial inconsistent condition- 4 real ps and 2 confederates called a blue slide green on 2/3 of the trials control group- 6 real ps
125
what were the findings of moscovicis study
consistent minority-persuaded majority to say green on 8% of the trials inconsistent minority- persuaded majority to say green on less than 2% of the trials
126
conclusions of moscovicis study
supported role of consistency in minority influence- as a consistent minority was more effective than an inconsistent one initial influence of a minority may be more at a private level than a public level
127
strengths of moscovicis study
laboratory experiment- high level of control over variables- enabling researcher to establish cause and effect standardised procedure allows replication
128
limitations of moscovicis study
artificial trivial task-lack of mundane realism and ecological validity 8% of trials is quite low success rate- so not strong support for the role of consistency
129
who researched the role of flexibility in minority influence
nemeth and brilmayer
130
how did nemeth and brilmayer investigate the role of flexibility
simulated jury situation- discussed amount of compensation to be awarded in a ski lift accident
131
what were the findings of nemeth and brilmayers study
rigid minority- no effect on other group members flexible minority (willingness to compromise)- did influence the majority timings of compromise important- compromising late more influential late compromise shows commitment and flexibility early compromise shows less commitment and percieved as 'caving to the majority'
132
evaluation of nemeth and brilmayers study
less artificial task compared to moscovici has greater mundane realism and ecological validity questions moscovici- questions whether consistency necessarily results in minority influence (certainly rigid consistency was found not to be persuasive)
133
why is minority influence thought to be valuable
'opens the mind'- to consider alternative opinions and may lead people to think more deeply about their decisions
134
what is social change
when a society as a whole adopts a new belief or way of behaving which then becomes widely accepted as the norm
135
what can social change involve
social progress social revolution
136
eg of social progress
introduction of anti discriminatory laws and practices
137
eg of social revolution
removal of a tyrannical regime, breakdown of a communist state
138
role of social influence in social change
role of minority influence role of majority influence- normative social influence role of obedience and disobedience
139
role of minority influence in producing social change
history shows lots of examples where social change has begun with a deviant minority eg civil rights movement
140
examples of social change
gender equality- womens right to vote- suffragette movement, equal pay, sex discrimination act- womens rights movement removal of apartheid in south africa racial segregation ended, anti discrimination laws and practices- civil rights movement
141
how does a minority influence produce a social change
creating attention cognitive conflict consistency augmentation snowball effect dissociation model
142
how does creating attention help produce social change
deviant minorities draw attention to issues that may otherwise have been ignored by the majority eg through protests eg the suffragettes used educational, political and militant tactics to draw attention to their cause
143
how does cognitive conflict help produce a social change
the minority creates conflict between what the majority group members currently believe and the position advocated by the minority we are motivated to reduce this conflict this leads the majority to think more deeply about the issues
144
how does consistency help produce a social change
minorities are more influential in bringing about social change when they express arguments consistently - both over time (intra individual consistency) and with others (inter-individual consistency) eg the suffragettes maintained their position over a number of years and remained consistent in their arguments
145
how does commitment and the augmentation principle help produce a social change
if a minority is seen to be willing to suffer for their views they are seen as more committed and therefore taken more seriously by others through suffering- their impact is increased/ augmented eg suffragettes risked imprisonment or death- hunger strike
146
how does the snowball effect help produce social change
minority influence initially has a small effect but this then spreads more widely as more and more people consider the issues being promoted until it reaches a 'tipping point' - leading to wide scale social change eg acceptance of the suffragettes position was gradual
147
how does the dissociation model help to produce social change
''social forgetting'' (social cryptoamnesia) the majority dont like to associate themselves with a deviant minority as a result minority groups tend to influence the majority over a longer period of time than in majority influence over time the minority ideas become assimilated into the majority viewpoint- but the content and the original source become dissociated eg coming to accept equal rights for men and women- but no longer associating this viewpoint with a feminine perspective
148
social change and majority influence
happens through normative social influence
149
who researched social change and majority influence
nolan et al- conserving energy goldstein et al- ''towel reusage''
150
what did nolan et al find out about majority influence and social change
placed door hangers on the doors of san diego residents once a week for a month carried one of four messages- one stated that the majority of the nieghbours regularly tried to conserve energy (information they had learned from a prior survey) (group norm condition) control group-door hanger simply encouraged energy conservation (but no rationale for this) only the group norm condition led to significant decreases in residents energy consumption
151
what did goldstein find about majority influence in producing social change
attempting to change hotel guest behaviour by encouraging them to reuse their towels compared the impact of 4 door hangers including these three examples: help save the environment help save resources for future generations join your fellow citizens in helping to save the environment- followed by information that the majority of hotel guests did reuse their towels when asked (group norm condition) the final ''group norm'' message increased towel reuse by an average of 34%
152
what was the conclusion of goldsteins study
demonstrated that when individuals were told other hotel guests reused towels they were likely to reuse their towels demonstrating normative social influence
153
social change and obedience
obedience- obeying laws that reinforce social change eg smoking ban, drink driving laws
154
social change and disobedience
disobedient models milgram variation- 3 teachers (2 disobedient teacher confederates) can explain civil disobedience- Rosentrasse protest presence of others willing to resist creates confidence to stand up to powerful authority civil disobedience can produce civil change eg rosa parks- civil rights movement
155