Social Influence Flashcards

(55 cards)

1
Q

A01 explanations of obedience

A

-Milgram proposed the agentic state theory which means we act as a representative of someone in authority, we feel no personal responsibility for our actions individuals pass on the responsibility onto them ‘agentic state’
-opposite it the autonomous state, this is where and individual will direct their own behaviour and take responsibility for their actions
- people move from autonomous state to agentic state when confronted with an authority figure
-this person has power because of their social standing and shift from autonomy to ‘agent’ this is called the agentic shift
-binding allows pple to minimise and ignore the damaging effects of their behaviour do reduce the ‘moral strain’ they are feeling e.g shifting blame to victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A01- explanations of obedience -legitimacy of authority

A

-we are more likely to obey those we perceive have authority over us and is justifies by the individuals position of power within social heirarchy
-one of the consequences of legitimacy of is some people are granted the power to punish there’s ie police and prison -
-so we hand over control of our behaviour to people we trust to excerise our authority
-however hirstiy has shown us that powerful leaders like hitler can use legtitmacy of authority for destructive purposes
- ‘destrtive authority’ was shown in milgrams study when the experimenter used prods ro order the pts to behave in ways that went against their conscience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AO3- explanations of obedience- strength research -legitimate Authority

A

-glass and Schmitt showed students a film of milgrams study and asked them to identify who was responsible for harm to the learning
-found that students blamed the experimenter rather than ps du to legitimate authority , experimenter being at top if he hierarchy and students believe ding the ps were agents of authority
-a strength as students recognised legitimate authority as cause of obedience supporting explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A03- explanation of obedience- strength milgrams research -agentic state

A
  • in a variation to his study the researcher was placed in a different room to the ps
    -rather than giving orders face to face ps were instructed to administer shocks over the phone
    -this resulted in a dramatic fall in obedience from 65% to 21%
    -shows that without the presence of an authority figure ps had shifted to an automonus state
    -now saw themselves as responsible for their actions resulting in a fall for obedience
    -strength as it supports view that obedience increases when in agentic state and decreases in autmonus state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A03- explanation of obedience- weakness - evidence does not support agentic state

A

-there is research evidence to show obedience is not always due to being in an agentic shit
-Mandel describes one incident where nazis were ordered to shoot civilians in a small town in Poland
-this was despite the fact that they did not have direct orders to do so, they were told that they could be assigned to other duties of they preferred
-this suggests that dispostiotnal factors may also play a role in explanaing obedience
-although milgram believed that the agentic state best explained his findings he did concede that some individuals are just plain cruel and will use a situation to satisfy Their sadistic impulses
- a weakness as the explanation may be. Limited and cannot account for why only some people shift to the agentic state while others do not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A03- explanation of obedience- strength variations -legitimacy of authority

A

-found ps were more likely to obey researcher (authority figure) when the research took place in the prestegious setting of Yale uni (65% ) compared to everyday setting of run down offices (47.5%)
-strength as is suggest we obey cause we perceive that the authority figure has treated legitimate authority and social power
- also bickman found that when he asked passers y in nw York to lend money to a stranger for a parking meter they would obey 49% of the Rome when we has dressed in street clothes but it increased to 92% when in a security guards uniform.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AO1 discuss authoritarian personality obedience -adorno

A

-investigated obedient personality
-administered the F-scale to 2000 middle class, white Americans
-scale measure AP in which an individual has to agree/disagree with a series of statements looking at their views on ethnic/religious minorities, politics, economics and morals
-Adorno found that ppl with a high f scale score identify with strong people/people with a higher status showing respect to them and are disrespectful of the weak
-suggesting those with AP are more likely to obey because of their respect for those superior to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AO1 discuss authoritarian personality obedience - respectful

A
  • authoritarian charactersistics include an individual being extremely respectful and obedien towards people of authority and are dismissive of those inferior to them seeing them as weak
  • they have a strong need for a leader to enforce trad laws and have convential attitudes towards sex race and gender so therefore more likely to be racism and sexist
  • individuals are about as black and white thinking as they cannot deal with uncertainty and being flexible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AO1 discuss authoritarian personality obedience- formed

A
  • formed in childhood as a result of harsh strict parenting in which high standards are placed upon them and criticised for failing
  • conditions of worth are placed upon them meaning as children they did not receive unconditional love from parents but instead provided with love of they met they parents standards
    -e.g getting an A
  • scapegoating occurs as a result of ll the behaviours the parents display to them this results in the individual displacing feelings onto people they perceive as weaker than them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AO3 discuss authoritarian personality obedience limitation —methodology

A
  • one flaw ss f scale has been crtsised as being open to acquiescence bias in which individuals merely agree with all questions
  • this question’s reliability of findings and may have been merely someone acquesicing and not answering the level of agreement truthfully
    -social desirability bias may have also occurs because the ps wanted to provide socially expectable answers that they believed were socially ‘correct’ and made them fit in with the people
    around them
    -therefore a weakness as the findings lack validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

AO3 discuss authoritarian personality obedience limits sample— weakness

A

-another limitation of Adorno’s study is it was a limited sample
-he used all white Americans from middle class backgrounds
-means his sample was unrepresentative of the wider population and therefore the results like external validity as they cannot be generalised to other people all over the world and of different social classes
- therefore it is flawed in its methodology as any supporting evidence is insufficient as it makes it the lack validity in that the results may have come from confounding variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AO3 discuss authoritarian personality obedience -strength supporting research

A

-milgram and elms conducted interviews with a small sample of obedient ps who scored highly on the f scale believing that there may be a link between obedience and AP found that those who scored hight on f scale obeyed more
Therefore a strength as it increases the validity if the study in those with AP are more likely to tobey to those they perceive have a high social status
-however his is a correlation as it impossible to draw the conclusion that AP causes obedience we only know that the two factors are linked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A01- resistance to social influence

A

-refers to the ability of people to withstand the social pressures to conform to majority or obey authority and this is influenced by both situatuionl and dispositional factors
-the two explanations are social support and locus of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A01- resistance to social influence- social support

A

-refers to the presence of People to resist pressures to obey or conform as they act as a model to help people do the same
-pressure to conform is reduced if there are other people who are not conforming
-ash’s research shows that the dissenter does not have to give a right answer just one not the majority picks
- allowing others to follow their own conscience acting as a ‘model’
- Asch does how its. Not longer term as if the dissenter starts to conform with the group again, so will the participant
-in milgrams variation obedience dropped to 10% from 65% when disobedient confeds were introduces acting as a model for others to copy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A01- resistance to social influence- locus of control

A

-refers to an individuals perception about undying main causes of events in their lives
- those with an internal locus of control (ILOC) hvae a high level of personal control
-take responsibility of their. Own actions, are achievement orientated and resist pressure from others
-those woth an external locus of control (ELOC) Believe life is determined by external factors such as fate and luck, are more infulenced by others and do not take responsibility over decisions
-most are places on a continuum scale between internal and external external, most people aren’t purely internal or external
-those with high internal (LOC) are more likely to resist pressures to conform or obey as they are more self assured and take responsibility so they are more likely to base decisions based on their own beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A03- resistance to social influence strength— research support

A

-e.g when Asch introduced a dissenter who gave the correct answer on the lines test conformity decrease from 30% to 5%
-this is a strength as it shows social support is significant in bringing about independent behaviour and reducing social influence
-therefore a strength as is it increases the validity of social support as a n explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A03- resistance to social influence- imitation non supporting research

A
  • limitation is not all research supports the link between LOC and resistance
    -twenty et al found that overtime Americans have become more resistant to obedience but have also become more external in their locus of control
    -this contradicts and opposes the suggestion that having an internal LOC leads to resistance as we would expect the Americans to be more internal
  • this reduces the validity of LOC as an explanation for resistance
    -but results may be due to changing nature of society where things become increasingly outside of our personal control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A03- resistance to social influence strength - mores point evidence for social support

A

-there’s evidence to support the role of dissenting peers in resisting conformity
-Allen and Levie found independence increased in an Asch like study even when the dissenter wore thin glasses and stated he had poor vision so meaning he couldn’t judge the lives accurately
- this shows that resieistance is not motivated by what someone says but enab;es someone to be free from pressure of conformity by a group and is supportive of the idea that social support decreases conformity levels and leads to more independent behaviour
-therefore a strength as is increases the reliability of the explanation a there is evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explanations for conformity A01

A

-conformity is a type of social influence that describes how a person changes their attitude or behaviour in response to group pressure
-The three types of conformity are: compliance identification and internalisation
-Compliance: is the shallowest level of conformity, a person changes their public behaviour, and the way they act in public but not their private beliefs, and only when they are in the presence of the group
-This is usually a short term change and is often the result of normative social influence
-Identification is the middle level of conformity:
-A person changes their public behaviour and their private beliefs but only while they are in the presence of the group
-This is normally short-term change and normally the result of normative social influence
-Internalisation: Is the deepest level of conformity
-A person changes their public behaviour and their private beliefs
-This is normally a long-term change and he’s often the result of informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Explanations for conformity A01

A

There are two key explanations for why one conforms
-Informational social influence and normative social influence
- NSI; When a person confirms to be accepted and to feel like they fit into a group
-if a person confirms because it is socially rewarding to or to avoid rejection for example feeling like they don’t fit in
-NSI is normally associated with compliance and identification
-Therefore this explanation of social influence leads to a short-term type of conformity which is motivated by the desire to fit in with the majority
-ISI is when a person performs to gain knowledge or because they believe that someone else is right
-Informational social influence is usually associated with internalisation, when they change their public behaviour and their private beliefs on a long-term basis
-This semi permanent change of behaviour and belief is the result of a person adopting a new belief system
-For example, if a person changes their political ideology from conservative to liberal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Explanations for conformity A03

A

One strength is Ashes study into conformity provides research support for normative social influence
-He found that many of the participants went along with the obviously wrong answer of the other group members
-When asked by asch in a post experimental interview, why they did this, the participant said that they change their answer to avoid disapproval from the rest of the group which clearly shows that compliance had occurred. Is the participants confirmed in order to fit in.
-Furthermore asch demonstrated in a later variation though when the predator publicly conform is removed by asking participants to write down their answers on a piece of paper rather than say them aloud the conformity rate fell to 12.5% as the fear of rejection became far less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Explanations for conformity A03

A

Additionally Jenness provide research support for the role of informational social influence
-Participants were asked to initially make an independent judgement about the number of beans contained in a jar
-Then they were asked to discuss their estimates in a group setting
-Participants within me to make a second individual private estimate
-She found that this second private estimate moved closer to the group estimate
-And that females typically confirmed more
-This shows the internalisation of group beliefs will occur, especially in unfamiliar ambiguous situations
-One weakness is the NSI does not count for individual differences
-mcgee and naffiliators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Explanations for conformity A03

A

-however a strength of conformity is it can have real world applications
-For example that has been demonstrated the NSI can also occur beyond an artificial lab setting
-Schultz et al gathered data from many hotels over a week where guests were randomly allocated rooms as either control rooms or experimental rooms
-The control rooms had a door hanger informing participants of environmental benefits of reusing towels
-In the experimental group they had additional information saying that 75% of guests today chose to reuse their towels each day
-The results showed the in comparison to the control, guests in the experimental who received a message that contained normative information about other guests. It reduce their needs for towels by 25%.
-This shows they had confirmed to fit in with perceived group behaviour

24
Q

Asch’s research A01

A

Actually study it was to investigate the influence of a majority group on a behaviour of an individual
-His sample considered of 123 male students in America who believe they were taking part in a vision test
-Participants were place in a group of six confederate for each member was asked to make a judgement about the length of a line
-And which line was the same size as a baseline?
-Confederate always answered first and the participant 2nd to last
-In turn each person had to say out loud which line was most likely target line in length
-The correct answer was always obvious
-and a total of 18 trials took place
-on average ps conformed to the incorrect answer 32% of the time
-and 74% conformed at least once

25
Asch’s research A01
- further investigations were done with different variations - he did three different variations - group size; Three c were added - conformity was 32% - 2 confers-13% 1 confed-3% Showing group size was important but only to a certain mount - unanimity: - when 1 confederate who gave a correct answer conformity dropped it 5 % - if confederates gave all different answers - dropped to 9% Difficulty: - made differences n line smaller - level of conformity increased -showing when a situation is ambiguous we are more likely to conform to ISI
26
Asch’s research A03 - X
- lacks temporal validity - classed as a child of its time - could be unique, took place in a period of us history when conformity was hight - additionally repeated by perin and Spencer - who found only 1 coforming in 139 trials - suggesting a cultural change has taken place - therefore it lacks temporal and historical validity - as not consistent across time
27
Asch’s research A03 X
- could be androcentric as they used an all male sample - other research suggests that women may be more likely to confirm as they care more about social roles -Additionally it could be culture bias as they were also all all from the US -And research has been done in China suggesting that conformity is higher as social groups are more important -This suggests that it’s not necessarily generalisable to the wider population as it only applies to American males
28
Asch’s research A03 - X
-could be subject to demand characteristics -Participants may have guessed the study and be behaved unnaturally -For example trying to please ask by behaving in a way that they thought he would like for example by conforming -Therefore this is a negative as it lowest the internal validity of Ashes study
29
Asch’s research A03 +
-Was a lab study -Therefore it was easy to control extreme variables for example the lines in the study -Therefore it’s a strength as it measures what it is intended to so it has high internal validity -However it does like mundane realism as they asked participants to measure the line length and it may not reflect conforming every day life -Therefore also being a weakness as it lacks ecological validity as we cannot generalise it to real life situations due to the artificial stimuli
30
Milgrams research into obedience
- on essay template
31
Research into Minority influence A01
-different factors can enhance the effectiveness of a minority -Including commitment, flexibility, and consistency -Consistency refers to the ways in which my influence is more likely to occur when the member share the same belief and retain it over time -commitment: the minority has to show full commitment to their message and not be put off by Naysayers and critics -Stay committed take a lot of effort -And strong commitment may lead the majority to think that the minority possibly have a point as they are willing to be mocked publicly or ridiculed and face hardship to change peoples lives -somebody who is committed to animal rights may involve setting lab animals free or starting a petition to close an animal testing lab -Minority has to be consistent in their view: -It must not change or fluctuate over time -Showing the majority that the minority are firm, resolute and strong in the face of possible criticism or hostility -There is synchronic consist: Where the minority represents a united front and shares the same message -And then Chronic consistency: Where the minority have been promoting their message for some time -An example, maybe climate change activists and their messages always the same the future is at risk -Flexibility is that the minority should be able to adapt their message as what they have to say may not be welcomed by many sectors of society -They must be open to accepting reasonable and valid counter arguments -being inflexible may put off the majority 
32
Research into Minority influence A01
Moscovici conducted a study to see if a consistent minority could influence a majority to give an incorrect answer in a colour perception task -His sample consisted of 172 female ps who were placed in groups of six and shown 36 slides of all varying shades of blue -Two of the six participants were confederate -In the consistent condition the two confederate said that all 36 slides were green -In the inconsistent condition the Confederate said that 24 of the slides were green and 12 were blue -M found that in the consistent condition the participants agreed on 8.2% of the trials were in the inconsistent condition the ps only agreed on 1.25% of the trials
33
Research into Minority influence A03 -X
-One weakness of his research is he used a bias sample of 172 female participants from America -Therefore it’s very hard to generalise the results of all the populations -For example, males -As males may respond differently to the minority influence -Additionally different cultures may also respond differently -His research could be classed as gyno centric -As his research takes an exclusive focus on the conforming behaviour of female participants to a minority influence -Furthermore research often suggests that females are more likely than males to conform and therefore further research is required to determine the effect of minor influence on male participants to improve the low population validity of this experiment
34
Research into Minority influence A03 X
-additionally he’s been criticised for breaching ethical guidelines during his study -He deceived his participants as they were told they were taking part in a colour perception test - When in fact they were taking part in a minority influence experiment -This also means that he did not gain fully informed consent -Although it is seen as unethical to deceive participants, his experiment required deception in order to achieve valid results -As if the participants were aware of the true aim they may have displayed demanded characteristics and acted differently -Thus a cost benefit analysis with dean at the insight Dane from such research was worth the short-term cost to the participants which could be dealt with with a means of a debrief following the study
35
Research into Minority influence A03
However, a strength of his research is the usefulness of his findings -He shows that minority groups can adopt this information to build a stronger campaign and hopefully lead to conversion and the snowball effect -For example, gay rights activist can improve the effectiveness of their campaign -This is because they can use the idea of consistency as well as the other factors commitment and flexibility in order to promote their beliefs and increase the amount of individuals from the majority who also internalises their beliefs Strenght for flexibility - There’s also strong supporting evidence by Nemeth who investigated the extent to which a flexible minority could influence others -Participants where one was a confederate were put into four groups -They were presented with a scenario in which someone had been injured with a ski with accident -They had to decide as a group how much compensation the victim will perceive -There was two condition -In flexible condition, the minority argued for a low rate of compensation and refuse to change his position -And the flexible condition that minority argued for a low rate of compensation, but then compromised offering a slightly higher rate -In the inflexible condition, minority little or no effect - In flexible condition, majority is much more likely to change their view and go along with my minority
36
Research into Minority influence A03 X
-however there are methodological issues with the research -Judging a colour of a slide is an artificial task and therefore like Monday realism since it’s not something that occurs every day -Research conditions are criticised as being too far removed from cases of real world minority influence such as political campaigning -The implications of real word cases are also grossly disproportionate to those seen in lab settings as they can for some people literally be cases of life or death and such Muscovy research lacks external validity
37
Research into conformity to social roles A01
-Zimbardo conducted a study on conformity to social roles called the Stanford prison experiment -The aim of his study was to examine the people would conform to social roles when placed in a mock prison environment -His sample consisted of male university students who are randomly assigned to one of two social roles -Prisoner or guard -The prisoners were arrested by local police given a numbered smock to wear and chains were placed around their ankles -The guards were given uniforms, sunglasses, handcuffs and baton -They were instructed to run the prison without using physical violence -The experiment was set on for two weeks, although it was terminated after only six days
38
Research into conformity to social roles A01
Zimbardo found that both the prisoners and guards quickly identified with their social roles -Within days the prisoners rebelled which was quickly crushed by the guards - Who then grew increasingly abusive towards them -The gods dehumanise the prisoners waking him during the night and forcing them to clean toilets with their bare hands -The president became increasingly submissive identifying further with their subordinate role
39
Research into conformity to social roles a03 X
Zimbardo’s experiment has been heavily criticised for breaking many ethical guidelines, especially protection from harm -Five of the prisoners left the experiment early because of their adverse reactions to the physical and mental torment -Furthermore some of the gods reported feelings of anxiety and guilt as a result of their actions during the Stanford prison experiment -Although he follow the ethical guidelines of Stanford university -and debrief his participants afterwards he acknowledged that the study should’ve been stopped earlier -It’s been suggested that he was responding more in the role of the superintendent of the prison rather than as the researcher with the responsibility for his participants -furthermore, he only used male participants in his sample showing beta bias as his research may have ignored or minimise the differences between men and women in relation to conformity to social roles and therefore we are unable to conclude whether the females conform to the social roles in a similar way
40
Research into conformity to social roles A03 X
- furthermore replication of the standard prison experiment was conducted by riecher and Haslam - Which contradicts the findings of Zimbardo -In this replication the participants did not conform to their social roles automatically -For example the gods did not identify with their status and refuse to impose their authority -The prisoners identified as a group to challenge the gods authority which resulted in a shift of power and a collapse of the prison system -These results clearly contradict the findings of Zimbardo and suggest that conformity to social roles may not be automatic as Zimbardo originally implied
41
Research into conformity to social roles A03 +
-however a strength was that he managed to maintain some degree of control and ecological validity -For example he tightly controlled the rules and he arrested prisoners from their homes so it had a real atmosphere -He also used many different data collection methods: like interviews , Covert/over observation and questionnaires -Which are all qualitative and in-depth- -also there was evidence that the participants did react situation as though it was real, as 90% of prisoners private conversations were about prison conditions -there for showing they were not acting and were not showing demand characteristics -Leading to more accurate results
42
Research into conformity to social roles A03 X
-furthermore individual differences and personality also determine the extent which a person confirms to social roles -In Zimbardo’s original experiment the behaviour of the gods very dramatically from extremely sadistic behaviour displayed by around one third of the participants in that role -To a few guards who actually helped the prisoners by offering support and sympathy giving cigarettes and reinstating lost privileges -this suggests that situational factors are not the only cause of conformity to social roles and dispositional factors such as personality also play a role in plain that Zimbardo‘s conclusions may have been overstated
43
Social influence in social change A01
- social change refers to how overtime beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of a society are replaced with new norms and expectations -moscovci put forward the conversion theory to explain how social change occurs - three clear factors - consistency, flexibility, commitment - the minority must be consistent in their opisition to the majority - firstly the minority must be consistent in their opposition to the major majority -History has proven many real life examples were consistent people have changed and questions and values and norms of society -Like Martin Luther King Nelson Mandela and the suffragettes who all led movements who were consistent in their views against the majority for many years which helps bring about social change -furthermore, the results of Moscovich’s research how about the importance of consistency in minority influence -He found that a consistent minority What 8.4% more likely to convince a majority of the colour of a slide was green when it was in fact blue in comparison to an inconsistent minority of 1.3%
44
Social influence in social change A01
also the minority must show they are committed to their cause -Because when the minority have so much passion and confidence in their point of view, it suggests to the majority that their view must somehow be valid and it encourages them to explore why offering more opportunity to be influenced — research is also shown that conformity complete a role in social change -This is because many of the attitudes and behaviours of individuals in society are shaped by what they perceive to be social norms -NSI suggests that we will often change our behaviour out of a desire to be liked and accepted by the majority to gain social approval -Therefore, if individuals in society Allowed to believe that the majority are behaving differently to the way they behave -Like recycling, more or drinking less -They may change their behaviour to avoid being seen as socially deviant
45
Social influence in social change A01
-then there is the augmentation principle -When the majority paid attention to the selfless and risky actions being taken by the minority group it’s much more likely integrate the group opinion into their own personal viewpoints due to the personal sacrifice made by the minority -Once the minority viewpoint has gotten the attention of some of the majority group members more and more people begin paying attention and the minority viewpoint gathers momentum which is called the snowball effect -an example would be the suffragettes who are consistent in their views and persistently used educational and political arguments to draw attention to female rights -Their main consistent for many years despite opposition continued protesting until they convince society that women were entitled to vote -Many of the suffragettes made sacrifices for their cause -Many wrist imprisonment and others wrist death -Making their influence even more powerful -Overtime their influence spread with people considering the issue that led to social change and all adults gaining the right to vote
46
Social influence in social change A03 X +
What issue is reports of social change with in a society can involve concepts that have not been or cannot be tested empirically -This means they lack scientific credibility -Furthermore many examples of social change rest on isolated case studies for example Martin Luther King -And therefore an idiographic approach is often taken -Consequently there is a large amount of subjective interpretation involved in explain the occurrences of social norms and such evidence should be treated with caution -However, there is a large quantity of research that supports the process is involved in social change -Such as Ash Milgrim and moscovici - Which take a nomothetic Approach as they have each credited universal law to explain human behaviour under certain social circumstances -Taking together these isolated case studies and relatively large scale studies provide credibility to the underlying processes involved in social change
47
Social influence in social change A03 X
-A weakness is minority influence can often act a barrier to social change - bashir et al we’re interested in investigating why so many people resist to social change even when they believe it to be needed -It was found that some minority groups such as environmental activists or feminist often live up to the stereotypes associated with those groups Which can be often seen as offputting for outsiders -this means that the majority often does not want to be associated with the minority for fear of being stereotypically labelled
48
Social influence in social change A03
-there is research to support for the role of normative social influence as a process for social change -nolan et al conducted a study which spanned one month in California and involve hanging messages on the front of doors of peoples houses in San Diego -encouraging them to reduce energy consumption by indicating that most all the residents in the neighbourhood already doing this - as a means of control somehow houses received a message about energy usage but with no reference to the behaviour of the other people in the area -it was found that the experimental group significantly lowered the energy consumption showing that conform can lead to positive social change
49
Situational variable affecting obedience to authority A01
-situational variables focus on external factors that affect the likelihood that someone will obey -Including proximity location and uniform -Milgrim conducted his original study in a lab of Yale University -To test the power of the location, Milgrim conducted a variation in a rundown building in Bridgeport Connecticut -In this variation the percentage of participants who administered the full 450 V dropped from 65% to 47.5% -Highlighting the importance of location in creating a prestigious atmosphere generating respect and obedience
50
Situational variable affecting obedience to authority A01
-likewise Milgrim demonstrated the power of uniform in a variation where the experimenter was called away and replaced by another ‘participant’ (confed) in normal clothes rather than a lab coat - The percentage of participants who admitted the full shock dropped to 20% -While this variation appears to suggest that uniform is an important fact to the effects authority is unclear from this variation alone. Whether uniform is the contributing factor or whether the experimenter also appears more legitimate due to his social status and role.
51
Situational variable affecting obedience to authority A01
-proximity refers to how close someone or something is -In a variation of Milgrim‘s experiment where the teacher and learner were in the same room the percentage of participants who administered the full 450 V dropped from 65% to 40% because the teacher could understand the line is paying more directly -In another variation the experiments have left the room and gave the instruction over a telephone -With this variation the obedience levels fell even further to 20.5% -This shows that proximity affects obedience in two ways -One the closer person is to the authority figure the more likely they ought to obey -To the closer a person is to the consequences of their actions the less likely they are to obey
52
Situational variable affecting obedience to authority A03
-while the situational variables light uniform proximity are seem to be important a weakness would be that research suggests that all the factors can also play a role for example culture -Kilman and Mann -Replicated Milgrim’s original study procedures in Australia -But they found the only 16% of the participants shocked the learner at the maximum voltage level of 450 V -Whereas Mantel on the other hand showed that it was 85% when conducted in Germany -this cross cultural comparison shows that different societies follow alternative hierarchical structures and children may be socialised differently from a young age to be more or less obedient -This suggests that while situational factors like uniform and proximity are important. All the factors may be a more significant role in obedient behaviour.
53
Situational variable affecting obedience to authority A03
However, strength is there is additional research support for the role of uniform affecting obedience -Bickman conducted a field experiment in New York City -Where confederates stood on the street and as members of the public who are passing by to perform a small task so just picking up a piece of litter or providing a coin for the parking meter -The outfit that the confederate was wearing varied from a smart suit jacket and Tie -A milkman’s outfit -Or a security guard -it was found that in the final condition the members of the public were twice as likely to obey the order given by the security guard -Which supports Milgrim’s idea that a uniform added to the legitimacy of authority figure and it is a situational variable which increases obedience levels
54
Situational variable affecting obedience to authority A03 x
However, orne and Holland have criticised Milgrim’s study -They believed that many of the participants worked out that the procedure was faked -It is even more likely that the participants in Morgan’s variations realised this because of the manipulation -A good example is that the variation where the experiment was replaced by a member of the public? -Even Milgrim recognise that this situation was so contrived that some participants would’ve worked it out -This is a limitation to Milgrim study and his variation as it is unclear whether the participant knew what was going on
55
Situational variable affecting obedience to authority A03
-however some have criticised Milgrim’s findings from his variation supports -The proximity of the experimenter, teacher and learner, the location of the study and the presence of uniform at all factors within the situation that influences obedience -However this perspective has been criticised by David Mendel -Who argued their offer is an excuse or an alibi for evil behaviour -it is also disrespectful to holocaust survivors to suggest that officers were just obeying orders