Social Influence Flashcards

(66 cards)

1
Q

What is Conformity?

A

A form of social influence whereby a person follows the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Compliance?

A

Publicly, but not privately going along with the majority to gain approval
(e.g. a person might laugh at the joke that others are laughing at while privately not finding it very funny)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Identification?

A

Publicly and privately accepting the majority in order to gain group acceptance
(e.g. a person might support a new football team every time they move to a new town)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Internalization?

A

Public and private acceptance of majority influence, through adoption of the majority belief system because it’s a view consistent with their own
(e.g. a person may become a Christian after sharing a flat with a group of Christian’s, as they feel share similar values)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 2 explanations of Conformity?

A

Normative Social Influence and Informational Social Influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Normative Social Influence?

A

When we conform to the majority to gain social approval or to avoid social disapproval, in other words we do something in order to be liked. This doesn’t necessarily mean that we agree with everyone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a Strength of Conformity?

A

There is research to support the role played by normative social influence in affecting people’s behaviour.
1. Linkenback and Perkins found that teenagers who were told that the majority of their peer group didn’t smoke were subsequently less likely to take up smoking themselves.
This suggests there is a real life application for the research as teaching people to be aware of this bias can often influence decision-making
2. Wittenbrink and Henley found that p’s exposed to negative information about African Americans (which they were led to believe that was the majority) later reported more negative attitudes towards them.
This suggests that the theory of ISI is accurate and therefore a valid explanation for why people conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a Weakness of Conformity?

A

It is difficult to distinguish between compliance and identification.
This is because we cannot be sure if the person actually believes others are right or whether that may change when they are in private.
This is a problem because they could have forgotten information given by the group or because they have received new information that has changed their minds. Therefore, it is difficult to determine what is and what is not compliance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Aim of Asch’s study?

A

To investigate the degree to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Method of Asch’s study?

A

123 American (M) student volunteers took part in a “visual perception task” and therefore was deceived about the true aim of the study.
It is carried out in a lab using independent group designs where each group was made up of 7-9 confederates and 1 participant.
Each person in the group was asked to decided which comparison lines matched the standards line. the lines were made obviously different from one another to be sure that the participant was conforming and not just unsure of the answer.
12/18 trials the confederates gave the wrong answer (standardised). The participant was always last or 2nd last to give their answer, so they were able to hear the confederate’s views first and therefore measure the influence of majority.
There was also a control group whereby they were asked to complete the task alone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the Results of Asch’s study?

A

P’s gave the wrong answer 33% of the time, with 75% conforming to at least one wrong answer. One quarter of the participants never conformed on any of the trials.
In comparison a control group had an error rate of 0.04% (used to check the ambiguity of the task)
Post-event interviews with the p’s highlighted 3 reasons for conformity:
1. Distortion of action, where the majority of p’s who conformed did so publicly but not privately
2. Distortion of perception, where some p’s believe their perception might be wrong
3. Distortion of judgement, where some p’s had doubts concerning their accuracy of judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Conclusion of Asch’s study?

A

People conform for 2 main reasons:
1. Because they want to fit in with the group (Normative Social Influence)
2. Because they believe the group is better informed than they are (Informative Social Influence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a Strength of Asch’s study?

A

The variables were highly controlled, as the confederates had to give the answer several times (where it was obviously wrong), and it may be difficult to do so convincingly. This matters because it means that the study can be replicated again to find the same results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a Weakness of Asch’s study?

A

There have been shown to be cultural differences in levels of conformity (individualists conformed 25%, and collectivists conformed 37% of the time). This means that although Asch’s research might explain individualist cultures, but generalisations cannot be made to collectivist cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are Situational Factors?

A

Anything in the environment that affects someone’s behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 3 factors that Asch changed that would affect conformity levels?

A

Group size, Unanimity of the Majority, and Difficult of the Task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What happened in Asch’s Group Size study?

A

Asch found that the minimum needed to elicit conformity was 3, about 32% of people conformed when there were 3 confederates.
He found that further increases did not have a major influence on conformity levels. Therefore he concluded, the larger the group size, the more likely conformity will occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What happened in Asch’s Unanimity of the Majority study?

A

In Asch’s OG study, all confederates gave the wrong answer, they were unanimous in their decision. When the participant was given the support of another participant or confederate, conformity dropped from 33% to 5%.
Therefore he concluded that when a group disagrees with each other, others are less likely to conform to the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What happened to Asch’s Difficult of Task study?

A

In the OG study, the differences between each line was large, and therefore the answers were obvious. In his variation, he made the lines less distinguishable from each other, so the task was harder to complete. Under these circumstances ‘conformity increased. Therefore Asch can conclude, the harder the task is, the more likely people are to conform as the answer is more ambiguous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a Weakness of Asch’s Variations?

A

Conformity is a difficult task that can also be mediated by other factors like self efficacy. For example, those who were more confident in their abilities were less likely to conform. This means thar cause and effect cannot be easily established in conform as there are potentially several mediating variables. This also reduces the validity of the theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the Aim of Zimbardo’s study?

A

To investigate the extent to which people would conform to the roles of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the Procedure of Zimbardo’s study?

A

24 out of 27 university students were rated most physically and mental stable were chosen from a group of volunteers for a prison study paying $15 a day.
Prisoners were arrested from their homes without their knowledge by the county police, when they arrived they were stripped and deloused, and were also given to wear an ID number, smock, a ball and chain, whilst guards wore khaki uniforms, reflective sunglasses and a baton.
(roles were randomly assigned)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What Are the Results of Zimbardo’s study?

A

Men assigned as guards began behaving sadistically, inflicting humiliation and suffering on the prisoners. Prisoners became blindly obedient and allowed themselves to be dehumanized.
After 48 hrs, one prisoner had to be released as he showed signs of mental breakdown, and after 6 days the experiment was stopped.
Qualitative data showed that 90% of the conversations in the prison were about prison life, this shows prisoners were fully immersed in their role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the Conclusion of Zimbardo’s study?

A

The study showed that participants conformed to their social roles of guards and prisoners, and started to be deindividuated (i.e. lost their personal identity and took on the identity of the group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What is a Strength of Zimbardo's study?
The study has high mundane realism, 90% of the prisoners’ private conversations revolved around prison life, and the guards talked about ‘problem prisoners,’ or other prison topics on their breaks; they never discussed home life or other topics. This means that the study has high external validity as it reflects a real-world situation well
26
What is a Weakness of Zimbardo's
The study was unethical, Informed consent did not cover all aspects of what the participants could expect about the procedure (e.g. the arrests at night). The right to withdraw was given but the routines and mechanisms of the prison world set up by Zimbardo made this difficult for all involved. And there was no protection from harm, Zimbardo actively encouraged the guards to be cruel and oppressive prior to the start of the study. This is an issue as the prisoners suffered in their role, both physically and psychologically, and the guards had to live with the knowledge of their potential for brutality after the study was over and the prisoners may have suffered PTSD as a result of their experience
27
What is Obedience?
Complying with the demands of an authority figure
28
What is the Aim of Milgram's study?
To investigate if ordinary American citizens would obey an unjust order from an authority figure and inflict pain on another person because they were instructed to
29
What is the Procedure of Milgram's study
It involved pairing participants with a confederate (Mr. Wallace), assigning roles through a rigged draw. The participant (always the teacher) was instructed to administer electric shocks to the confederate (learner) for incorrect answers to a memory task. A sample electric shock was given to the participant to convince them the procedure was real. At 130V, the learner went silent, and if the teacher tried to stop the experiment, the experimenter would response with a series of prods, e.g. "the experiment requires that you continue
30
What are the Results of Milgram's study (qualitative and quantitative)?
Quantitative: Milgram found that all of the participants went to at least 300V and 65% continued until the full 450V Qualitative: P's experienced severe psychological distress including shaking, sweating and controllable seizures. 84% of p's however said that they were glad to have taken part in the experiment. (The hypothesis of the experiment estimated that only 3% of them would continue to 450V, suggesting that the findings were very unexpected)
31
What is the Conclusion to Milgram's study?
He concluded that under the right circumstances, ordinary people will obey unjust orders
32
What are 3 Situational Variables that affect Obedience?
Proximity, Location and Uniform
33
What happened in Milgram's Proximity study?
He changed the distance of the experimenter to be further away (on the phone), and the confederate nearer (in the same room) 1. when teacher and learner were in the same room, obedience went from 65% to 40% 2. when the teacher was forced to put the learner's hand onto a metal plate and electrocute him, obedience went from 65% to 30% 3. When the teacher and the experimenter were in a different room, obedience when from 65% to 21% This means that the closer the teacher was to the learner, the less likely he was to continue the shocks, they close the teacher was to the experimenter, the more likely they would obey
34
What happened in Milgram's location study?
He changed the location to a run-down office in Bridgeport, Connecticut. He found that obedience went from 65% to 47.5%. This means that obedience decreases in a less prestigious environment, this could be as it was seen as less legitimate and the p's did not feel the experimenter would take responsibility
35
What happened in Milgram's Uniform study?
In this variation, the experimenter wore casual clothes. Milgram found that obedience went from 65% to 48%. This means that wearing uniform increase the levels of obedience as it shows the level of authority they have over the individual
36
What is a Strength of Milgram's study?
It is done in a laboratory, and it had a strict control of variables. The variables could be properly controlled because the experiment was done in a laboratory. This means that we should be able to establish cause and effect, and the study had high internal validity
37
What is a Weakness of Milgram's study?
The p's were put in an artificial situation (they wouldn't naturally be in a situation of shocking people). This means the study has low ecological validity (can't be generalised easily) The study had issues with deception and a lack of protection. P's weren't able to give informed consent because they didn't know the real nature of the experiment, and they weren't told they could withdraw, P's were also visibly stressed during the study. Bu in Milgram's defence, no formal ethical guidelines existed at the time. This is a weakness as the study is unethical.
38
What is a Dispositional Factor?
Personality factors that can influence the behaviour in an individual
39
What is the Authoritarian Personality?
It was proposed by Fromm (1941) who suggested it as a way of explaining those holding right-wing views. It can be defined as a personality type characterised by a belief in absolute obedience to authority and domination of minorities
40
What is the F-scale?
The F-scale was developed as a questionnaire to measure the levels of authoritarian personality. The "F" stand for the potential for fascism and was used to measure how likely you are to obey authority figures. The f-scale contained several questions, e.g. 'obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues a child should learn'
41
What happened in Fromm's F-scale study?
He asked 2000 middle class white Americans' to answer his questionnaire. He found that authoritarian personalities are more likely to obey authority figures. There was a strong positive correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice. They are also more likely to be hostile to those inferior to them, and have rigid opinions and belief and uphold traditional values.
42
What traits do individuals with an Authoritarian Personality show?
Hostile and aggressive to those who are inferior to them, ethnocentric, black and white thinkers, inflexible to rules and laws
43
What did Adorno think about the Development of the Authoritarian Personality?
He believed that the Authoritarian Personality developed in early childhood, gaining information about obedience to authority from parents. This can be taught through punishing, shaming children for minor offences, making them hostile to people who are inferior to them
44
What is a Weakness of the Authoritarian Personality as an explanation for Obedience?
1. In Fromm's study, the main issue with his sample is that it has cultural and class biases, which means the sample isn't representative of obedience in all individuals 2. There maybe a mediating factor for authoritarianism and obedience, which is education. They found that people who had lower level of education are more likely to show the authoritarian personality. (they also found the same correlation in p's who had completed Milgram's experiment.) This is a problem as it suggests that there may be other factors playing in the role of obedience that are not highlighted when studying the authoritarian personality. Therefore we have to be careful drawing conclusions from supporting evidence, as we not be able to establish cause and effect between the personality type and obedience
45
What is the Socio-Psychological Explanation for Obedience?
The influence others have on your own behaviour as opposed to other external factors that affects your behaviour (e.g. situational variables)
46
What is the Agentic State?
When a person sees themselves as an agent for carrying out another person's wishes. They instead believe the responsibility is held by the authority figure. (people move from the autonomous state where they take responsibility for their own actions to the agentic state)
47
What is the Agentic Shift?
When we move responsibility from ourselves to an authority figure.
48
Why did participant's from Milgram's OG study continued to administer electric shocks?
The majority of people said that they were just doing what they were told. This suggests that people were in an agentic state where they felt the responsibility lay with the experimenter, and not them.
49
Why do people stay in the agentic state even when they are being asked to do something negative?
To look for approval from others, so people tend to follow the social etiquette of the situation. This is a binding factor which holds us to the situation and makes us obey
50
What is the Legitimacy of Authority?
A Legitimate Authority is someone who we perceive to be in a position of power, and therefore has control over the situation. (Milgram believed that people presume that in most situations there is a person who has control over the situation)
51
Why do people resist Social Influence?
Resistance to social influence involved Disobedience, and Non-Conformity which can occur in 2 ways: Independence and Anti-Conformity Independence is a lack of consistent movement either towards or away from social expectancy ("Do your own thing") Anti-Conformity is a consistent movement away from the majority group views ("adopting the beliefs of smaller groups")
52
What is a Locus of Control?
Locus of Control was identified by Rotter as a personality dimension (trait). It can be defined as the extent to which people believe they are in control of their own lives
53
What do you believe in if you have a high Internal Locus of Control?
You believe that you can affect the outcomes of situations, and you are in control
54
What do you believe in if you have a high External Locus of Control?
You believe that things turn out certain ways regardless of your actions ("Everything happens for a reason"), and you are not in control
55
What is a Strength of Locus of Control?
There is research to support the LOC explanation. Holland (1967) who repeated Milgram's baseline study, measured whether participants were internal or external. He found 37% of Internals didn't continue to the highest shock level, compared to 23% of Externals. This matters because it suggests that resistance to social influence is affected by a person's personality, which means the theory has high validity
56
What is a Weakness of Locus of Control?
One problem with the LOC explanation is that it relies on a questionnaire to explain resistance to social influence. Specifically, this is a problem as a questionnaire cannot always portray how a person will act in situations of obedience or conformity in an everyday situation as people are inherently bad at objectively evaluative themselves. This is a problem as it means that the internal validity of the questionnaire is decreased
57
What is Social Support in Conformity?
The feeling of solidarity among yourself and others makes you less likely to conform in a social situation. Asch's study shows that people feel a strong need to fit in (normative social influence) and need to act in the right way (informative social influence)
58
What did Milgram find about Social Support?
2 confederates who were acting as p's alongside the real participant. Together they had to give the electric shocks to the p's, each confederates was told to refuse to continue and leave the experiment at different points. They found that obedience dropped from 65% to 10%. This shows that social support is important in resisting social influence
59
What is a Strength on Milgram's Social Support Study?
There is research to support that disobedient models are a powerful source of social support. They found that conformity was reduced on a task involving visual judgements, even when the model wore thick glasses. Additionally, Asch found that conformity reduced from 32% to 5.5% when there was another dissenter who agreed with the participant. This is important as it suggests that the theory of social support has validity as several studies on social support show that in times of social influence, allies who support the minority view can reduce the pressure people feel to conform
60
What is Minority Influence?
A form of Social Influence in which the majority of people are persuaded to adopt the beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours of the minority
61
What is Minority Influence driven by?
Minority Influences are driven by a need to be right (informational social influence). In particular, people have the drive to do the right thing, because they publicly and privately believe that it is the best thing to do, therefore showing internalisation
62
What 3 behaviour styles do Minorities need to show for a change of majority opinion?
Commitment, Consistency, and Flexibility
63
What is Commitment?
The degree to which members of a minority are dedicated to a cause or an activity. The greater the perceived assurance, the greater the influence. People in the minority are taking a great risk going against the social norms, therefore showing confidence in their beliefs helps to influence others in the strength of their belief. It usually requires them to take part in an activity which is socially or physically risky
64
What is Consistency?
A minority influence is the most effective when there is stability in the expressed position over time and agreement among the members of the minority. This is because when we are exposed to a minority view, our immediate thought is that it must be incorrect. However, if the minority are stable in their views over a period of time, people gain confidence in them.
65
What is Flexibility?
A willingness to be adaptable and to compromise when expressing a position can increase the belief in the minorities influence. As minorities normally hold little power, they must negotiate to show they are willing to compromise. Equally, however, they should not be overly comprising as they are likely to show a lack of consistency
66