Social Influence Flashcards
social facilitation and inhibition conformity obedience ethical issues (36 cards)
what is meant by social facilitation?
tendancy for people to perform better on tasks in the presence of others than when alone
what is meant by social inhabition?
the tendency for people to perform less well in the presence of others than when alone
what is the arousal theory of social facilitation?
the presence of a person causes a state of alertness or arousal. the ‘preparedness’ leads to a readiness to respond with the most adaptive response.
What is the dominant response?
Zajonc - arousal acts as a drive that brings out the dominant response. > the response most likely to be given in a situation that is most usual/appropriate/best practiced answer.
[priority over other responses]
- tend to be correct so social facilitation occurs.
What does the dominant response explain?
explains the contradictory findings (social inhibition)
by struggling with the task > presence of others increases arousal and therefore the dominant response >however it is the wrong response/answer.
evaluate the arousal theory
-doesn’t explain why some people who are good at a task are incompetent in front of an audience.
describe the Yerkes Dodson law (graph)
inverted U shape between arousal and performance. as arousal increases, so does performance up to an optimum level. after the optimum level, increased arousal means performance decreases
portions of graph:
upwards - positive
downwards - negative
problems with arousal theory?
doesn’t acknowledge cognitive processes. some believe the thought of competition in the case of co action and the thought of being judged affect social facilitation. even though results from animal studies suggest they aren’t necessary
what is apprehension theory
cottrell - arousal is caused by apprehension(anxiety) of being evaluated by others.
arousal = learned response.
evaluate the apprehension theory
support for theory:
no social facilitation on well learned tasks when audience is blindfolded.(cannot judge)
doesn’t explain social facilitation in animals
May be ONE cause of arousal in the presence of others, not the ONLY
distraction conflict theory?
baron - presence of others in distracting = 50% attention on task and 50% on audience.
distraction leads to negative effect on task performance
conflict increases arousal > dominant response more likely
processes impair performance on hard tasks but improve simple tasks performance
evaluate distraction conflict theory
can be applied to any distracting stimulus. Any distraction can cause social facilitation or inhibition.
can explain results from social facilitation studies on animals
key points for social facilitation?
people tend to perform better on easy tasks and worse on hard tasks in the presence of others
several theories for this effect: arousal, apprehension and distraction conflict
arousal theory means production of dominant responses
apprehension theory stresses the presence of others causes evaluation anxiety
distraction conflict theory suggest the presence of others is distracting
what is conformity?
form of social influence where group pressure (real or imagined) result in a change in behaviour
where would you find conformity?
any group important to the individual such as membership or a reference group ( we like or admire)
describe sherif’s research on conformity
participants were asked how far and in which direction the light moved (auto kinetic effect - visual illusion)
singular people gave their own answers and the answers varied
in small groups of two or three participants answers converged and gave similar estimates
therefore, participants are influenced by judgement of others
SherifSharif had not asked participants to arrive at a group estimate; this shows conformity due to imagined pressure
criticisms of the sherif’s study
it is not unusual for people to be influenced by the judgement of others when they are unsure of their own judgement
describe Asch’s experiment
in groups of 7 to 9 there was one participant all the rest were stooges. they were asked to match lines (participant answered 2nd to last)
when stooges answered wrong the participant was more likely to answer wrong as well even though it was obvious which was the right answer
what does asch’s experiment show?
has been referred as ‘the surprise of solomon asch’ as the participants were in a situation where the information from others in the group was wrong.
this shows the errors made by participants was due to social influence - conformity
why did people conform in asch’s experiment
- not to look like an outcast
- convey a good impression
- excuse of inaccurate perception
- not to spoil experiment for experimenter
what did Asch believe from his responses?
major factor in conformity was to:
- avoid conflict
- avoid social disapproval.
discuss the experiment Asch did to show social disapproval
one stooge gave the incorrect answer in the presence of 16 naive participants - this led to the stooge being ridiculed by the participants
evaluate Asch’s work
- implications for many aspects of group behaviour - decision making and social interaction.
- can be used as an example pf rigorous standards required in psychological research: highly controlled conditions
- results have been replicated with similar results
- shows conformity has beneficial effects such as: social stability, group norms provide a standard, expectations of behaviour ensures a structure and order
- lack of validity
- ethical issues
- 2/3 participants guessed correctly
variations of Asch’s experiment (factors effecting conformity)
- size of majority (1 stooge had no effect, 2 stooges had some 3 stooges had the most and no more after that)
- unanimity (gave participant a supporter and reduced conformity by 5.5%)
- task difficulty (more difficult = more conformity) HOWEVER people who perceive themselves as competent tend to conform less than others (perrin and spencer & maths/science kids)
- self esteem (low self esteem conform more than people with high self esteem: strong need for social approval)
- anonymity (conformity dropped by just over 12% when naive participants could write answers down privately. this shows we are still influenced by others even when asked for private views eg politics)