Social Influence : Resistance To Social Influence Flashcards

(43 cards)

1
Q

Is locus of control dispositional or situational ?

A

Dispositional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is social support dispositional or situational ?

A

Situational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Locus of control

A

Degree of control which an individual feels the have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do internals believe ?

A

Things happen to them under their control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do externals believe ?

A

Things happen outside their control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who’s more likely to resist social pressure

A

Internals because they base decisions on their own lives and they’re more confident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

LoC evaluation : Holland +

A
  • repeated milgrams study and 37% internals didn’t go to 450v
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

LoC evaluation: -

A
  • loc in resisting social pressure has been exaggerated so limited role
  • rotter LoC only comes to play in novel situations so its only in a few situations
  • on familiar situations, previous experienced will always be more important
  • contradictory research
  • twinge found people became more resistant to obedience but also more external but if resistance linked to LOC , should be internal
  • challenges link
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is minority influence ?

A

One person or a small group influence beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which type of conformity does minority influence lead to ?

A

Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did Moscovici study minority influence ?

A
  • blue slide , green slide study

- 6 people asked to judge colour of slide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moscovici : how many confederates ?

A

2 confederates who said slide is green on every 2/3 of trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moscovici : how did participants react to confederates

A
  • they answered the same wrong answer on 8.42%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Moscovici : what happened when a second group was introduced ?

A

The second group was exposed to an inconsistent minority and agreement fell to 1.25%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Moscovici : what happened with a third control group ?

A

No confederates and participants only got it wrong on 0.25%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consistency

A
  • consistency increases interest from others
  • can be over time
  • people rethink own view
  • draws attention to minority view
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Commitment

A
  • extreme activity to draw attention

- sacrifice because they’re at personal risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Flexibility

A
  • minority need to be prepared to adapt so show balance

- compromise

19
Q
  • of consistency
A

You can be seen as opinionated and unbending

20
Q

Process of change

A
  • if you hear something new you might take time to thinks bout it deeper
21
Q

Snowball effect

A

Switch from minority to majority and the rate of conversion becomes faster

22
Q

Social support

A

Ability to withstand social pressure to conform to the majority

23
Q

Why do people resist pressure ?

A
  • They have an ally who builds confidence

- breaks the unanimity because individuals have support

24
Q

Minority influence evaluation : research support for consistency +

A
  • Moscovici showed consistency had a greater effect than inconsistent opinion
  • wood et al also found minorities who were consistent were more influential
  • consistency plays major role in minority influence
25
Minority influence evaluation : artificial tasks -
- tasks can be artificial - for example Moscovicis slide study isn’t realistic - far from how minorities would change behaviour in real life - lacks external validity
26
Minority influence evaluation : research support for internalisation -
- in moscovicis study participants they answered right privately so majority were being influenced by minority argument - even if people agree they don’t publicly agree as they dint want to be associated with minorities
27
Minority influence evaluation : limited real world application -
- clear distinction between majority and minimum so the majority have higher power / status - in real life situations majorities have more power and its more complaicated
28
What is social change ?
- society changes its beliefs to create new social norms - happens at a gradual pace - minority influence is the main driving force
29
Examples of social change
- Homosexuality | - drink driving
30
Stages of social change
1. Draw attention by focusing majority 2. Minority show consistency 3. Deeper processing 4. Augmentation principle 5. Snowball effect 6 critical mass which leads to social cryptomnesia
31
What is critical mass
Pony the minimum becomes majority
32
What is social cryptomnesia
- people have a memory that social change occurred but they don’t remember what happened
33
Conformity creating social change
- dissenters encourage others to dissent | - links to NSI
34
Obedience creating social change
- disobedience can lead to social change
35
Conformity maintaining social change
- people conform to new norms via compliance | - fit in (NSI)
36
Obedience maintaining social change
- new social norms can have laws and rules
37
Example of obedience maintaining social change
Homophobia is illegal
38
Social influence / change evaluation : resreach support
- Nolan hung messages telling residents to reduce energy - first group compared to control had a significant difference - conformity can lead to social change through nsi
39
Social influence / change evaluation : methodological issues -
- how social influence leads to social change relies on Moscovici , asch and miligram - all lack internal/external because of artificial nature - reduces validity of minority influence linked to social change
40
Social influence / change evaluation : indirectly effective -
- decades for attitudes towards smoking and drink driving to change - nemeth that effects of minority are likely to be indirect and delayed therefore social change happened slowly - role of minorities influence may be very limited
41
How does social support help people ?
It allows them to act according to their own conscience
42
Social support : Aschs study +
- A confederate gave the right answer throughout and conformity dropped to 5% - when the non-conforming confederate starts conforming the participant sdoes so the effect is not long lasting
43
Social support evaluation : miligram +
2 confederates which refused to shock and obedience dropped to 10%