social influence - social resistance & change Flashcards
(75 cards)
define social resistance:
the ability of people to withstand
the social pressure to conform to the majority or to obey authority
what do situational and dispositional factors influence?
they affect the ability to withstand social pressure
two explanations for resistance to social influence:
situational factors:
social support
dispositional factors:
locus of control (LOC)
define social support:
the perception that a person has assistance available from other people
how is resistance from conformity shown?
asch:
conformity is less likely when a dissenter breaks the unanimity of the majority
how is resistance from obedience shown?
obedience is less likely when a disobedient role model challenges the legitimacy of authority
how does social support encourage resistance?
-the presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey can help others & give them confidence to do the same
-these people act as models to show others that resistance to social influence is possible
social support in conformity + effect:
-conformity is reduced by a dissenting peer
-the effect is not long lasting
-when the non-conforming peer starts conforming gain, so does the naïve participant
social support in conformity: evidence
-asch found that conformity reduced
to 5% when one of the
confederates gave a different
answer to the rest of the group
-this was true even when the
confederates answer was a different
wrong answer the others in the
group
social support in conformity: explanation
-social support breaks the
unanimous position of the majority
-social support raises the possibility
that there are other ways of
thinking/responding
-the presence of an ally makes the
individual more confident in their
decision and more able to stand up
to the majority
social support in obedience: description
-obedience is reduced by one other
dissenting partner
-the dissenter’s disobedience frees
the pp to act from their own
conscience (as obedience requires you to give away free will)
social support in obedience: evidence
(milgram)
-obedience dropped from 65% to
10% when the ppt was joined
by a disobedient confederate (variation)
-independent behaviour increased
from 35% to 90% in the disobedient
peer condition
-the dissenter gave the participant
the opportunity to stop the shock
social support in obedience: explanation
-people are more confident to resist obedience if they can find an ally who is willing to join them
-they are more confident to
disobey
-disobedient peers act as role
models on which an individual can
model their own behaviour
AO3 - strengths of social support
-there is research support for social support (asch & milgram)
-research demonstrates the role of a
social support in resisting obedience (albrecht & gamson)
ao3 / strength - research support from asch
P - there is research support for social support in reducing pressure to conform
E - in one of Asch’s (1951) variations, one of the confederates was instructed to give the correct answer throughout. in this variation the rate of conformity dropped to 5%.
↳ this demonstrates that if the real participant has support for their belief (social support), then they are more likely to resist the pressure to conform.
L - this suggests that social support lowers the pressure from the group making it easier to demonstrate independent behaviour
ao3 / strength - research support from milgram
P - there is research support for social support in reducing pressure to
obey which comes from milgram
E - in one of milgram’s variations, the real participant was paired with two additional confederates, who also played the role of teachers
↳ in this variation, the two additional confederates refused to go on and
withdrew from the experiment early
↳ the percentage of real participants who proceeded to the full 450 volts dropped from 65% (in the original) to 10%.
L - shows that if the real participant has support for their desire to disobey, then they are more likely to resist the pressure of an authority figure
ao3 / strength - research demonstrates the role of a social support in resisting obedience (albrecht)
P - research demonstrates the importance of social support in resisting social influence
E - albrecht (2006) evaluated teen fresh start USA, an 8-week programme to help pregnant adolescents aged 14-19
resist peer pressure to smoke.
↳ social support was provided from a
slightly older mentor or “buddy”
↳ at the end of the programme, adolescents who had a “buddy”
were significantly less likely to smoke than a control group of participants, who did not have a “buddy”
L - this shows that social support can help young people to resist social influence as part of an intervention in the real world
ao3 / strength - research demonstrates the role of a social support in resisting obedience (gamson)
P - research demonstrates the role of a
social support in resisting obedience
E - gamson (1982)’s participants were told to produce evidence that
would be used to help an oil company run a smear campaign
↳ the researchers found high levels of resistance, probably because the participants were in groups so could discuss what they were told to do
↳ 29 out of 33 groups of participants (88%) rebelled against their
orders
L - this shows that peer support can lead to disobedience by undermining the legitimacy of an authority figure
define locus of control
(+ who came up with it)
how much control a person feels they have over things that happen to them
rotter et al
what is a LOC continuum?
LOC is a scale and people vary in their position on it (a scale that is continuous
but quite distinct at the extremes)
what do internal LOCs think?
that they are mostly in control of what
happens to them
what do external LOCs think?
they believe that things happen to them & they have no control over these things (things happen due to chance/luck)
characteristics of people with an internal LOC:
-more self-confidence
-achievement oriented
-less need for social approval from others
-more intelligent
-more likely to resist pressure to conform
characteristics of people with an external LOC:
-have a need to gain social approval from others
-less self confidence