Sociocultural Approach Flashcards
(18 cards)
Individual and the group: Social Identity theory - key info (5)
- Social categorisation - process by which we decide which groups we belong to and don’t
- Social identification - when we identify with a group and modify our behaviour to belong. We identify with the identity most salient to us
- Social comparison - means of justifying one’s group membership
- Positive distinctiveness - idea that we see to achieve self-esteem by positively comparing ourselves to ingroups and outgroups
- In-group favouritism - where we are likely to identify with those in our group over others
Social identity theory - study name
Abrams et al.
Aim of Abrams et al
To determine if in-group indentity affects one’s willingness to conform
Sample and research method of Abrams et al.
Sample: Independent, 50 undergrads
Research method: lab experiment
Procedure of Abrams et al.
PPs either in psych major (ingroup) or art history major (outgroup). PPs (one at a time) put in a room with a bunch of confederates and told not to talk to each other. Everyone shown stimulus line + three diff lines and asked which were the same length. 2x2 conditions: ingroup/outgroup and public/private.
Results of Abrams et al.
In group overall conformed higher than out group
In group conformed more in public than private
Out group conformed more in private than public
70% of all PPs conformed at least once. No gender diffs. In/outgroup priv didn’t differ significantly.
Conclusion of Abrams et al.
Indicates that social categorisation can play a key role in one’s decision to conform publicly
(+) & (-) of Abrams et al.
(+) Highly controlled = allows causal rs
(-) Low eco
Social cognitive theory - key info
- Social cognitive theory - behaviour is learned from the environment through processes of modelling and the environment
- Modelling - imitated behaviour if leads to desirable consequences
- Modelling takes place if learner has high self-efficacy - one’s belief in one’s ability to complete a task
- Direct tuition - where kids learn from a teacher, parent or other role model through conscious reinforcement of good and negative behaviours (rewards/ punishments)
- Participatory learning - where kids participate in learning and apply knowledge in new situations
- ## Vicarious reinforcement - a person’s behaviour influenced by othersConditions needed for social learning to take place:
- retention
- attention
- motivation
- potential
Factors affecting potential social learning:
- contrasts
- liked & respected
- ingroup
- reinforced
- consistent
Case study for social cognitive
Joy et al.
Aim of Joy et al.
Investigate impact of TV on children’s aggressive behaviour
Sample + research method of Joy et al.
Sample: 120 elementary kids across 3 towns in BC, CND
Research method: longitudinal, naturalistic observation
Procedure of Joy et al.
Study conducted across 3 towns in BC - Notel had no access to TV prior to exp, other two towns had. During this, a new canadian channel was introduced to all 2 towns. Researchers observed 120 elementary kids on school playgrounds.
Results of Joy et al.
Notel - aggressive behaviour of kids increased significantly. Other 2 - no significant change. Males showed higher aggression than females. Peer and teacher ratings supported findings
Stregnths and limitations of Joy et al.
(+) High eco
(-) Confounding variables - dk if behaviour change due to intro of TV or other factors
(-) Hard to measure “aggressions” - construct validity
(-) Self reported
Stereotypes key info
- Stereotypes - schemas that help us understand the world that are given to us socially instead of personal experience. Are general, prone to confirmation bias; can be positive or negative
- Prejudice - preconceived judgement, opinion or attitude directed towards certain people based on their membership in a particular group
- Discrimination - prejudicial behaviour that can result from labelling someone through a stereotype
- Stereotype threat - occurs wen one is in a cituation where there is a threat of being judged or treated stereotypically or a fear of doing something that would inadvertently confirm that stereotype.