Sociological Theories Of Education Flashcards
(32 cards)
Functionalism ( Durkheim) 2 main functions of education
- Creates social solidarity
- Specialists skills
social solidarity
-Invokes trust, prevents the state of nature/anarchy
-Transmits culture, passes on norms & values, teaching history connects students to their shared heritage- promotes ‘social integration’, creates a ‘collective conscience’
- Turns children into ‘social beings’
- School as ‘society in miniature’, interacting with non- family members, rules of behaviour/engagement, socialisation
Specialist skills
- Modern economies required specialist skills
- The division of labour
-Cooperation between specialists helps to create social solidarity
Talcott parson’s argument on education
- Education as a ‘focal socialising agent’
- The bridge between the family & society
- Different rules for different children at home: parents rules, elder son Vs younger daughter
- Education: Universal & impersonal rules in society
- Education: same rules for all, same exam questions + pass mark
Parsons argument on school being similar to wider society ( status is gained through achievement)
- Promotional or dismissal
- Exam pass or exam fail
MERITOCRACY
- power, rank, influence & rewards gained via individuals according to their individual merit
- equal opportunity for all
- less focus on ‘ascribed status’
What did David & Moore show
- Education is a device for selection & role allocation (future work roles)
- Identified inequalities within society, argued it was necessary to ensure that the most talented undertake important roles
- Not everyone is equally talented
- Offer higher rewards for challenging roles, to attract the most talented
Davis & Moore why is education ‘proving ground’ for those with ability/ talent
-The most talented will gain the highest qualifications
What did Blau & Duncan show
- Prosperity in modern economies a product of human capital (workers skills)
- Meritocratic education helps allocate the best jobs to the best workers, maximising productivity
Criticism of functionalism
- Equal opportunities in education may not exist, achievement greatly influenced by class
- Melvin Tumin criticised Davis & Moore:
• How do we know a job is important? It’s highly paid
• Why are some jobs more high paid than others? Because they are important! - Functionalists argue that education instils the values of a whole society,
Marxists argue education only instils the values of the ruling class
More criticism of functionalism
- Dennis Wrong
• Functionalists have an over socialised view of students, passively absorb information, blank slates/tabula rasa, never push back or rebel, one way process - The Neoliberals/New Right argue that the state education does not prepare students adequately for work
Neoliberalism & the new right
- Similar to Functionalists:
• Not everyone is equally talented
• Meritocracy: education geared towards preparing people for the world of work
• Socialise people into shared values (such as competition), instil a sense of national identity - Key difference?
• NR do not think that education is achieving its goals
Neoliberalism & the new right
- The ‘one size fits all’ approach (the NR claim) imposes uniformity and disregards local needs
- Consumers have no say
- System is inefficient: wastes money, achieves poor results, demands little of teachers, ultimately results in a poor economy
Solution for neoliberalism & new right
MARKETISATION:
• By turning education in to a market it would force schools to compete
• Increasing the diversity of schools available would give more choice to consumers
• Increase efficiency
- Chubb & Moe consumer choice
• Claim American state education has failed, therefore needs to be opened up to market forces
• Claim disadvantaged groups have been badly treated by state education, failed to create equal opportunity
• Claim state education is inefficient, does not train pupils for work
• Claim private schools are better because they are answerable to consumers
- Chubb & Moe consumer choice
• Compared achievements of 60k pupils from low-income backgrounds in state and private schools, the pupils in private schools did 5% better
• More market, more efficiency, power to consumers, increase that 5%!
• End guaranteed funding for schools by government, give parents a voucher to spend on education
• Force schools to compete for the vouchers and therefore their main source of funding
Two roles for the state
- State publishes a framework for schools to operate within
- State imposes a National Curriculum to ensure students share in the same culture/heritage (creating social solidarity)
- State publishes a framework for schools to operate within
Ofsted produce inspection reports and league tables
- State imposes a National Curriculum to ensure students share in the same culture/heritage (creating social solidarity)
•Affirm national identity: British history, Christian values etc.
• Oppose multicultural education
Evaluation of the Neoliberal/New right perspective on education
- Competition between schools arguably only benefits the middle class
- Social inequality and poor school funding could be to blame for low achievement rates
- Parental (consumer) choice vs. national curriculum [contradiction?]
- Marxists: imposes the culture/identity of the ruling class, not a shared culture/ identity
Competition between schools arguably only benefits the middle class
• MC possess the knowledge of how the education system works
• Thus are able to gain access to better schools
2 tools by which the bourgeoisie maintain power ( Louis Althusser)
- The repressive state apparatus
- Ideological state apparatus
What is the repressive state apparatus
The monopoly of violence, the threat of its use, can use physical coercion (force) [police, army, courts)
What is the Ideological state apparatus
Maintain rule by controlling people’s ideas, values and beliefs (religion, mass media, education]
Education an important part of the ideological state apparatus
- It creates and reproduces class inequality by:
- Imposing the culture of the ruling class on to each generation of W/C students - It makes class inequality appear acceptable by:
- Persuading the W/C to accept their position and to ‘know their place’