sources Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

rules of making treaties:

A
  • customary IL
  • VCLT (1969) - mostly codification of customary law
  • Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organisations or between International Organisations 1986 (not yet in force)
  • Vienna Convention on the Succession of States in respect of Treaties 1978 (1996, Austria not party)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

definition of treaty

A
  • written
  • between states
  • governed by IL
  • concluded after the entry into force of VCLT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

types of treaties

A
  • bilateral or multilateral
  • law-making or contract-type
  • open or relatively closed or closed
  • self-executing or non-self-executing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

can IOs conclude treaties?

A

only those which fall into their competences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who can conclude treaties under VCLT?

A
  • persons acting on behalf of the state have to produce full powers to show that they represent the state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

full powers

A

Heads of State
Heads of government
Foreign ministers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

heads of diplomatic delegations accredited by states and heads of diplomatic missions between home country and accredited country

A

have the right to adopt the text but not to express consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

stages of treaty making

A
  1. negotiations
  2. authenitcation of the text
  3. consent to be bound
  4. deposit
  5. entry into force
  6. registration with the UN
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

negotiations and adoption of the text

A

by agreed majority or 2/3 or consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

authentication

A

the state representatives express their agreement to the text and prevent it from further changes with initials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

consent to be bound

A

a) signature (if no further requirement)
b) ratification: internal act of approval and international act
c) accession: if the state hasn’t signed
d) exchange of instruments (when declared)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

deposit

A

transmission of the instrument of ratification to the depositary (usually one of the contracting parties or the SG); depositaries exchange treaty-related information between parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

entry into force

A

when all the negotiating states have consented to be bound OR on a specified date

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

registration

A

with the Secretary General of the UN, to prevent secret treaties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

objective entry into force

A

the treaty enters into force on the date agreed by the contracting parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

subjective entry into force

A

the date when treaty becomes binding for a state that only expresses consent to be bound later

17
Q

obligation before entry into force

A

prohibition to defeat the object and purpose of the treaty - Art 18 VCLT

18
Q

a reservation can be made unless:

A
  • the treaty prohibits this reservation
  • the treaty allows only specific reservation and this reservation is not included
  • the reservation is incompatible with the purpose and object of the treaty
18
Q

reservation

A

unilateral statement by a state to exclude certain provisions of a treaty in its application to the state

19
Q

views on not allowed reservations

A

a) inadmissible reservations are void
b) the inadmissible reservations render the the consent to be bound ineffective

ILC: entire treaty without reservation will bound state unless clear intention showing that it does not want to be bound in that situation.

20
Q

possible reactions to a reservation:

A
  1. acceptance
  2. no reaction = tacit acceptance after 12 months
  3. objection - this provision does not apply between these states
  4. object and declare intention to exclude the effect of the treaty between the 2 states
21
Q

pacta tertiis nec nocent nec prosunt

A

treaties neither harm, nor benefit third parties
consent is presumed for rights, but imposing duties requires the party’s consent

22
Q

interpretation methods according to VCLT

A
  • objective, textual interpretation: ordinary meaning
  • contextual interpretation: considering the intention of the parties
    (preamble, annexes, subsequent agreements and practice)
  • object and purpose of the treaties
23
Q

amendment of a multilateral treaty - only by some parties

A
  1. the treaty doesn’t prohibit it
  2. rights of other parties aren’t affected
  3. object and purpose of the treaty is not impaired
24
grounds for invalidity of a treaty
1. lack of consent - only when the treaty was concluded in manifest violation of a rule of fundamental importance 2. error - about a fact or situation which was essential for conclusion but only if: the state didn't contribute to the error wasn't on notice of a possible error 3. material defects: fraud, coercion of a state, corruption/coercion of state representatives 4. incompatibility with ius cogens - prohibition of the use of force, slavery, genocide, apartheid, slavery
25
conditions for termination
- the treaty provides termination options - customary law on termination exists in VCLT - peace treaties cannot be denounced unilaterally
26
grounds of termination in VCLT
- material breach - supervening impossibility of performance - fundamental change of circumstances
27
material breach of bilateral treaty
= the rejection of the whole treaty or a provision essential for the object and purpose - entitles a party to terminate the bilateral treaty
28
material breach of multilateral treaty
1. all other parties must unanimously agree to terminate/suspend the treaty 2. the affected party may suspend the treaty in its relations with the breaching state 3. if the violation radically changes the position of each party, each party may suspend the treaty with all parties
29
supervening impossibility of performance
when an object necessary for the performance of the treaty is destroyed or permanently disappears - a party may invoke supervening impossibility to terminate the treaty - the causing state cannot terminate, withdraw or suspend the treaty
30
fundamental change of circumstances (clausal rebus sic stantibus)
if the treaty no longer corresponds to political realities: - relevant circumstances existed at time of conclusion - these circumstances were essential to conclude the treaty - the change was unforseen - it would lead ti a radical reshaping of treaty obligations - the state hasn't brought that change by breaching IL obligations
31
desuetudo
conflicting customary law has developed
32
obsolence
performance is no longer expected in the face of a new situation
33
disputes about the invalidity or termination
on grounds of ius cogens - ICJ otherwise - VCLT optional rules for conciliation procedure in an annex
34
who concludes treaties under austrian law?
Federal President
35
self-executing treaty
doesn't require a domestic legal act to become applicable in national law
36
non-self-executing treaty
requires a national legal act for its implementation and applicability