Speaking In Tongues IX Flashcards
(37 cards)
- Give a brief definition of speaking in tongues.
“The supernatural gift of speaking in another language without its having been previously learned”
- a. Are tongues ecstatic, unintelligible, meaningless utterances?
B. How does scripture describe tongues? Cite a supporting verse.
A) no
B) the language of angels or men. I Corinthians 13:1
- A. What Old Testament passage did Paul quote as prophecy concerning tongues?
B. Where can Paul’s use of that passage be found?
A) Isaiah 28:11-12
B) I Corinthians 14:21-22
- In what two parallel passages in acts does peter make a connection between “the rest and refreshing” of Isaiah 28:11-12 and the gift of the spirit?
Acts 22:38 and 3:19
- Given the apostles’ understanding of Isaiah 28:11-12, how do we reconcile that with the interpretation of Isaiah 28 as a prophecy of Israel’s invasion by Assyria?
This is a possible instance of prophecy having an immediate fullmillment and distant fulfillment. This is called “the law of double reference” and is commonly found in prophecy and typology
6what are tow major objections to mark 16:17 as scriptural support for the phenomenon of tongues?
A
B
A). The following verse, 16:18, is misunderstood and misapplied, thus the credibility of verse 17 is attacked. Commonly, the practices of “ snake handlers” ate cited in an effort to discredit verse 17.
B) Two important ancient manuscripts do not include the passage of mark 16:9-20
- What answer can be first major objection to mark 16:17?
The proper approach is to understand both of these verses. Verse 18 does not give authority to handle snakes as test of faith, for we are not to tempt God (Matthew 4:7). Rather, this verse is a promise of protection in case of accidents (Acts 28:1-6). The spiritual application of verse 18 night be found in Luke 10:19, wherein evil spirits are represented as serpents and scorpions.
8.
A. Is either the codex sinaiticus or codex varicanus complete or accurate in and of itself?
B. Do other ancient manuscripts include mark 16:9-20
A). No both contain several apocryphal books and the Vatican us omits all of the New Testament after hebrews 9:14.
B). Yes. The third oldest manuscript, codes alexandrinus, does, among many others
- Why is this passage In mark attached so eagerly?
Morgern critics reject this passage because of its support of the miraculous as a sign of the power and legitimacy of God’s word. From ancient times, this passage became questionable as most of Christendom lost contact with the Holy Spirit and the use of spiritual gifts.
- Would the bible support the doctrines of mark 16:16-20 if this passage wee excluded?
Yes. These doctrines ate found in other scriptural passages
11. A. List the three signs that accompanied the outpouring of the spirit on the day of pentecost and describe what each signified. 1 2 3
B. Unlike the sound of wind and tongues like fire speaking in tongues is a recurring sign of an____________________ ___________ ___________
A).
1) sounds like wind—
12
What Old Testament prophecy did peter use to identify the phenomenon of speaking in tongues?
Joel 2:28
13
A. How did God use speaking in tongues to make the apostles understand that the gospel was available to all mankind, including the Gentiles?
A) when Cornelius and his household spoke in tongues, peter realised that God had poured out His spirit on gentiles. This meant that one need not convert to Judaism to be saved.
B). No. Speaking in tongues a;one convinced peter of Cornelius’ spirit baptism.
- What important lesson is illustrated by the Ephesians believers’ sporot baptism with accompanying tongues?
This account demonstrates that the baptism of the spirit with the initial evidence of speaking in tonfies is for all believers and was not only for the first group of Jews, samaritans, and gentiles.
- The account of the samaritans‘ receiving the Holy shots does not mention tongues. List three reasons for concluding that the Samaritan believers spoke in tongues:
A
B
C
A). Despite joy, miracles, belief, and water baptism, everyone knew that these believers gad not received the spirit. Philip, peter, and john all expected a particular sign and knew the samaritans did not gave the spirit due to the absence of this sign.
B. Everyone knew that the samaritans received the spirit when the apostles laid hands on them. A definite sign, different from the miracles which had occurred, must have been observed.
C. The sign must have been an unmistakeable, supernatural sign for simon the magician to bee impressed enough to attempt to buy it
- The bibles does not describe how paul received the Holy Ghost, but Paul’s teachings emphasise that speaking in tongues comes by the spirit. What might we conclude about his conversion experience in light of the fact that he spoke in tongues, as he noted in I Corinthians 14:18?
That he spoke in tongues when he received the spirit, as did everyone else
- A. Do the acts accounts of the spirit baptism constantly indicate any immediate, individual outward manifestation of the spirit baptism other than tongues?
B. Did the apostles accept any other accompanying manifestation of the spirit as sufficient proof of the spirit baptism?
17.
A. No
B. No
- What fact avot the tongue makes it a unique bodily member with which God can display his presence and control?
It is th most difficult member to direct or control; it is the unruly member
- Compare or contrast speaking in tongues in the church to the experience of mankind at the Tower of Babel.
One caused unity, the other disunity, man was separated from man by a confusion of language at babel. Beginning with Pentecost, God began to bring together a body of believer who were united as a spiritual family by the sign of tongues
- Why ate tongues a universal and valid sign under any circumstances?
Regardless of nationality, language or local, people can recognise speaking in tongues when it happens to them.
- A. Is speaking in tongues alone proof of the abiding presence of the spirit?
B what is the ultimate test of discipleship?
A. No
B. Love, according to john 13:34-35
- How might one have a continuing ability to speak in tongues and not be saved?
This ability only indicates that one has faith for particular gift and can field to God for that particular purpose. Such a person could gave resumed a sinful life or or embraced false doctrine. Yet God will honour the faith he does continue to show, in the manner he might honour a sinner’s prayer. Also, we might conclude that romans 11:29 gas a general application; so that a spiritual gift, once bestowed, is never entirely revoked by God. It is also possible that the human Brian learns words once given by the spirit.
Finally, we cannot overlook the possibility that man or even the power of Satan will cause counterfeits of Gods miracles
- If a person continues to speak in tongues frequently, is this in itself a sign of great spirituality?
No. Scripture gives no example or teaching to indicate that speaking in tongues is a necessary sign of great spiritually after the initial spirit baptism.
- Paul wrote that we should covet the best gifts. What gives spiritual gifts whether tongues, prophecy or anu other their true value?
Love