Speech perception and reading Flashcards

1
Q

What are prosodic cues?

A

Cues in speech that serve as hints to sentence structure and intended meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The ‘linearity problem’

A

The difficulties of speech perception produced by co-articulation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The ‘segmentation problem’

A

Deciding how the continuous stream of sound should be segmented into words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are ‘formants’?

A

Frequency bands emphasized by the vocal apparatus when saying a phoneme.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The sound frequencies of vowels vs consonants.

A

Most vowels are below 1200 Hz most consonants above 2400Hz.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the phonemic restoration effect

A

‘filling in the blanks’; Samuel (1990) concluded that contextual information (when this effect is observed) influences the listener’s expectations in a top-down fashion, but these expectations then need to be confirmed with reference to the sound that is actually presented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the ‘McGurk effect’

A

in speech perception - the blending of auditory and lip-movement information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cohort theory of spoken word recognition

A

Marslen-Wilson & Tyler (1980) - various knowledge sources (lexical, syntactic, semantic) interact and combine with each other in complex ways to produce an efficient analysis of spoken language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The 5 components of Ellis & Young’s (1988) spoken word processing model.

A
  • auditory analysis system
  • auditory input lexicon
  • semantic system
  • speech output lexicon
  • phoneme response buffer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

‘pure word deafness’

A

Parking (1996) - impaired speech perception but intact speech production, reading, and writing, hypothesized to be caused by damage to the auditory analysis system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

‘word meaning deafness’

A

Route 2 is intact, but routes 1 & 3 are severely impaired: able to repeat familiar words, but often not understand their meaning; much better at repeating words than non-words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

‘auditory phonological agnosia’

A

damage to route 3: good ability to perceive and understand spoken familiar words, but impaired at perceiving and repeating unfamiliar and non-words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

‘deep dysphasia’

A

patients make semantic errors when asked to repeat spoken words (saying words that are related in meaning); find it harder to read abstract words, & very poor ability to repeat non-words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

perceptual span

A

effective field of view during reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reyner & Sereno’s (1994) three types of reading span:

A
  • The total perceptual span (the total area from which useful information is extracted); this is the longest span.
  • The letter-identification span (the area from which information is obtained).
  • The word-identification span (the area from which information relevant to word-identification processes is obtained); this is the shortest span.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The E-Z Reader model

A

Reichle et al. (1998) - about 80% of content words are fixated, compared to only about 20% of function words; common, predictable, or short words are more likely to be skipped over, because their lexical access has been completed while the current word is still being fixated

17
Q

the semantic priming effect

A

word identification on the lexical decision task is faster when the word is preceded by a semantically related word

18
Q

context effects on word recognition

A

two effects are commonly seen: the semantic priming effect, which is stronger, and the effect of expectation (told that smth should follow);
semantically related unexpected prime facilitates recognition more than semantically unrelated but expected primes

19
Q

The interactive activation model

A

McClelland & Rumelhart (1981) - Visual word recognition involves a process of mutual constraint satisfaction between the bottom-up information gained about the features in the words and the top-down knowledge about word and letter identities;
feature level - letter level - word level

20
Q

‘surface dyslexia’

A

a condition in which patients have particular problems in reading irregular words

21
Q

The three routes of reading (in the dual-route model :)

A

Route 1 - grapheme-phoneme conversion
Route 2 - lexicon + semantic system
Route 3 - lexicon only
however the fundamental distinction is between reading based on a lexical or dictionary look-up procedure and reading based on a letter-to-sound procedure

22
Q

‘phonological dyslexia’

A

a condition in which there are particular problems with reading unfamiliar words and non-words; patients successfully use route 2, but route 1 is impaired

23
Q

‘deep dyslexia’

A

a condition in which there are particular problems in reading unfamiliar words, and in which there are semantic reading errors (e.g., “ship” read as “boat”)

24
Q

Is word naming better predicted by regularity (dual-route model) or by consistency (connectionist)?

A

By consistency (Glushko, 1979)