status and power Flashcards
(48 cards)
what are the 5 different types of power?
reward, referent, expert, legitimate, and coercive
what is status?
an individual’s position in the group as
perceived by other people in that group
what is power?
the extent to which an individual can
influence or control another individual’s thoughts,
feelings and behaviour.
what is a group?
Two or more people who interact with each other, are
influenced by each other and who share a common purpose
what is the Stanford prison experiment?
9 guards and 9 prisoners were assigned randomly. the prisoners were locked in cells and guards had to maintain order in the prison. The purpose of the experiment was to observe the behaviour of the innocent people being locked up, and the behaviour of the guards when given power.
what was the IV (independent variable) and the DV (dependent variable) of the Stanford prison experiment?
the IV was whether they were assigned prisoner or guard, and the DV was the behaviour of the participants.
what was the result of the Stanford prison experiment?
the guards became aggressive toward the prisoners, and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress and anxiety. the experiment ended after 6 days because of the behaviour of the prisoners, and the experimenter’s wife came in and expressed her opinion on the experiment, persuading Zimbardo to end the experiment.
what ethical considerations were breached in the Stanford prison experiment?
no harm: the participants left with lasting mental harm
withdrawal rights: the participants felt they did not have the right to leave
debriefing: the participants weren’t appropriately debriefed after the experiment
beneficence: the participants did not benefit from the experiment, and there was no benefit to society
what is obedience?
adhering to the instructions of authority figures or the rules or laws of society.
what 3 factors affect obedience?
status of authority figure, proximity, and group pressure
what was the Milgrim’s experiment?
40 male participants were selected to discover whether participants would obey an authority figure causing harm to another person. The participant (teacher) would ask the learner questions and with every wrong answer, they were ‘shocked’. the teacher thought that with every shock, the learner was being harmed.
what was the result of the Milgrim’s experiment?
all 40 participants went up to at least 300 volts. 65% went up to the maximum shock level, 450 volts.
what was the IV and the DV of the Milgrim’s experiment?
the IV was the proximity of the authority figure and the DV was the obedience of the teacher, measured by the shocks they administered.
what ethical considerations were breached in the Milgrim’s experiment?
no harm, withdrawal rights, deception, debriefing
what is reward power?
ability to provide the desired response/ reward
what is coercive power?
ability to use an unpleasant
consequence (force)
what is legitimate power?
power is given by a higher authority. It
may be due to role or position.
what is expert power?
power is due to skills and depth of
knowledge
what is referent power?
power comes from the desire to relate to
or be like the (powerful) person
what is conformity?
the alignment of one’s thoughts, feelings, or behaviour to match those of others or societal expectations as an attempt to fit in with them.
what are social norms?
society’s unspoken rules and expectations regarding what’s normal, which mostly happens subconsciously.
what is the asch experiment?
50 male students thought they were participating in a study on visual perception, however, it was to measure whether individuals would conform to a majority group. the group started to read the wrong answers to the questions to see if the participants would conform.
what was the result of the asch experiment?
74% of participants conformed to the incorrect answers given by the group. 24% did not conform to the group at any point during the study and stated the correct answers
what factors could affect conformity?
group size, unanimity, normative influence, social loafing, informational influence, culture, deindividuation