Supreme Court Flashcards

1
Q

Marbury vs. Madison

A

Established the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review over Congress.
1803 (4-0 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland

A

Established the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review over Congress
1819 (7-0 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dred Scott v. Sandford

A

Denied citizenship to African American slaves

1857 (7-2 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Plessy v. Ferguson

A

Upheld “separate but equal” segregation laws in states

1896 (7-1 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Korematsu v. United States

A

Upheld internment of Japanese Americans during World War II

1944 (6-3 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Brown v. Board of Education

A

Separating black and white students in public schools is unconstitutional
1954 (9-0 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright

A

Criminal defendants have a right to an attorney even if they cannot afford one
1963 (9-0 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

New York Times v. Sullivan

A

Lawsuits based on libel or defamation must show intent or recklessness
1964 (9-0 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Miranda v. Arizona

A

Prisoners must be advised of their rights before being questioned by police
1966 (5-4 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Loving v. Virginia

A

Invalidated state laws prohibiting interracial marriage

1967 (9-0 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Roe v. Wade

A

Women have a constitutional right to an abortion during the first two trimesters
1973 (7-2 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

United States v. Nixon

A

President cannot use executive privilege to withhold evidence from criminal trial
1974 (8-0 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

A

Upheld use of race as one of many factors in college admissions
1978 (5-4 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bush v. Gore

A

No recount of the 2000 presidential election was feasible in a reasonable time period
2000 (5-4 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lawrence v. Texas

A

Struck down state laws that prohibited sodomy between consenting adults
2003 (6-3 decision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

District of Columbia v. Heller

A

Citizens have a right to possess firearms at home for self-defense
2008 (5-4 decision)

17
Q

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

A

Corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts in elections
2010 (5-4 decision)

18
Q

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

A

Upheld the mandate that most Americans have health insurance

2012 (5-4 decision)

19
Q

Shelby County v. Holder,

A

States and localities do not need federal approval to change voting laws
2013 (5-4 decision)

20
Q

Mapp v. Ohio

A

evidence obtained through an illegal search cannot be used at trial
“Fruit of the poisonous tree,”
1961 (6-3 decision)

21
Q

Fisher v. University of Texas

A

The court rules that taking race into consideration as one factor of admission is constitutional
2016 (4-3 decision)

22
Q

Terry v. Ohio

A

Stop and Frisks, under certain circumstances, do not violate the Constitution
1968 (8-1 decision)

23
Q

Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt

A

Determining whether two key provisions in Texas’ House Bill 2, enacted in 2013, constituted an “undue burden” on women seeking abortions in Texas
2016 (5-3 decision)

24
Q

Obergefell v Hodges

A

Same-sex marriage is legalized across all 50 states

2015 (5-4 decision)

25
Q

United States v. Windsor

A

Federal government must provide benefits to legally married same-sex couples
2013 (5-4 decision)