Task 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Specific phobia

-DSM criteria

A

A. anxiety about specific object or situation
B. phobic object or situation provokes immediate fear
C. actively avoided
D. out of proportion
E. 6 months or more
F. causes impairment
G. not another mental disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Specific phobia

-subtypes

A
  • animal
  • situational (flying, enclosed spaces)
  • natural environment (heights, dark)
  • BII (needles, blood)
  • other (clowns, choking, vomit)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Specific phobia

-3 components of process of anxiety (borkovec)

A

1) motoric escape and avoidance
2) physiologic activation of sympathetic branch ANS
3) cognitive appraisal of threat and harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Specific phobia

-differential diagnosis

A
  • Social phobia: content of fear network is interpersonal in nature
  • PD with agoraphobia: panic response itself distinguished from specific phobia
  • PTSD: its occurrence requires a direct experience
  • OCD: obsessions are far more chronic and repetitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Specific phobia vs agoraphobia

A
  • specific phobia, situational type: one situation is feared
  • agoraphobia: two or more sitations that are feared

when avoid or fear more than one situation but situations belong to the same cluster than specific phobia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Systematic desentization (wolpe)

A
  • aims to remove the fear response of a phobia, and substitute a relaxation response to the conditional stimulus gradually using counter conditioning.
  • First patients is taught a muscle relaxation technique and breathing excercises
  • second patient creates a fear hierarchy
  • third the patient works their way up the fear hierarchy
  • induction of relaxation not necessary so has fallen out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Exposure in vivo therapy

-3 phases

A
  • instruction phase: given a plausible model and explanation why fear was maintained. role of avoidance explained and mechanisms of change
  • direct in vivo exposure: approach feared object and stay in position until the fear is reduced by at least 50%
  • maintenance of results: practicing at home using self-exposure techniques
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Applied tension

A
  • for exposure in BII
  • trained to identify the earliest signs of bradycardia and drop in blood pressure, and then tense the body muscles to increase blood pressure and prevent fainting
  • combines muscle tension with in vivo exposure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Two-phase (biphasic) response to BII stimuli

A
  • initial phase: increase in heart rate and blood pressure

- second phase: characterized by bradycardia and hypotension leading to fainting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Classical conditioning

-example elevator

A

CS (elevator) + UCS (i will die) = UCR (fear response)

CS (elevator) = UCR (fear response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Classical conditioning

-US representation

A
  • stimulus can activate the mental representation of itself

- CS (barking dog) + US representation (dog attack) = CR (fear response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Classical conditioning

-extinction

A
  • dog slowly start to stop salvating when he hears the bell (CS) = inhibitory learning: slow decrease of response (CR) after a CS: the CR to the CS is slowly inhibited
  • association not broken but new association is learned = CS-noUS association
  • CS-US easily triggered by presenting only once the US after the CS = rapid reacquisition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Classical conditioning

-counterconditioning

A

-train the CS to predict reaction that is the opposite of the CR: relaxation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

classical conditioning

-latent inhibition

A
  • lot of experiences with CS-noUS makes it more difficult to develop a CS-US association
  • vaak tandarts zonder pijn, 1x wel pijn geeft nog geen CR (pijn) want vaak geen pijn gehad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

classical conditioning

-compound conditioning

A
  • series of CS that become associated: CS itself can be predicted by another CS.
  • CS1 (inside bus) - CS2 (dog enter bus) - CS3 (barking dog) - US (attack by dog)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

classical conditioning

-habituation

A
  • decrease of natural response (UR) to a stimulus (US)
  • vb huilende baby (gewenning) dus minder reactie
  • dishabituation: stimuls is habituated but then other externeous stimulus gets its original response back again
  • vb baby+hond huilen weer wel vervelend
17
Q

classical conditioning

-sensitization

A
  • increase of UR to a US

- vb huilende baby zo vervelend dat kleinste gehuil je al geirriteerd maakt

18
Q

operant conditioning

-positive reinforcement, reward

A
  • voluntary behavior of pressing lever is reinforced by the increase of a positive consequence
  • Sd (blue light) : R(pressing lever) - +Cpos (increase of food)
  • discrimnative stimulus (Sd) blue light and food and (S delta) red light and no food
19
Q

operant conditioning

-negative reinforcement, escape

A
  • Sd (blue light) : R (pressing lever) - -Cneg (decrease of shock)
  • S delta (red light) : R (pressing lever) - no change, stil shocked
  • Sd (dog leased): R (running away) - -Cneg (decrease of fear)
  • Sdelta (dog unleased): R (running away) - no change and panic
20
Q

Operant conditioning

-negative reinforcement, avoidance

A
  • Sd(blue light): R(pressing lever) - 0Cneg (hold of shock)
  • Sdelta (red light): R(pressing lever) - no shock
  • Sd (in park): R(walking away) - 0Cneg (hold of catastrophe)
  • Sdelta (home): R(walking away) - no attack possible
  • safety behavior: making sure catastrophe not occur 0Cneg but refers to behavior to stay in anxiety situation (CS)
21
Q

operant conditioning

-punishment of avoidance response

A
  • Short term: drop anxiety (-Cneg), holding of catastrophe (0Cneg), attention loved ones (+Cpos)
  • long term: decrease radius of action (-Cpos), increase fear intensity (+Cneg), starting new education (0Cpos)
22
Q

Two factor model of mowrer

-maintenance of anxiety disorders

A
  • through operant conditioning, CS-US associations shaped by classical conditioning remain intact and are remained
  • electricity cut off, but keeps pressing lever so will not learn that it is broken and shock will not appear
  • VB umbrella to holding of tigers
  • CS (no umbrella), R(keeping umbrella up), US (attack by tigers), reinforcement of R (0Cneg holding of tigers)
23
Q

two factor model of mowrer

-exposure

A

-to change the classical conditioning CS-US association you need to take away the avoidance behavior (R) learned by operant conditioning
-inhibition of R (staying with the dog)
CS (barking dog) - noUS (safe no dog attack)

24
Q

Return of fear in anxiety

-5 ways

A
  • rapid reacquisition: presenting CS-US together again
  • US reinstatement: experience with the US alone
  • Renewal: returning of fear when change in context
  • spontaneous recovery: just by passing time anxiety can suddenly return
  • disinhibition: an extraneous stimulus is presented
25
Q

Problem with conditioning for development phobia

field

A
  • cannot remember an aversive conditioning experience
  • not all people develop a phobia in a given situation
  • incubation: predict that fear decrease by non reinforced presentation of CS but opposite is true
  • uneven distribution of fears
  • indirect pathways to fear
26
Q

Classical conditioning summary

-Field

A
  • driven by CS-US associations
  • depends on past experience
  • not depend upon contiguity
  • can occur after only one trial
  • associations formed after one trial are persistent
  • CR and UR not necessarily the same
  • CS not always produce CR
  • can occur with actual CS and US
  • US not need to be biologically significant
  • extinction does not break CS-US association
  • traumatci incidents might not be traumatic at the time
27
Q

Blocking

-field

A
  • an association between US and CS2 has been ‘blocked’ because a link between US and CS1 already exists
  • CS1 - US
  • CS1CS2 - US
  • CS1 - CR / CS2 - no CR
28
Q

Latent inhibition

A
  • there have been previous encounters of the CS with no US.

- familiar stimulus takes longer to acquire meaning (CS) than a new stimulus

29
Q

Learned irrelevance

A
  • uncorrelated presentations of CS and US

- BV gezoem van een bij kan ook iets anders zijn dus geen CR

30
Q

Super learning

A
  • stimulus results in fast learning or large CRs due to previous learning with another stimulus
  • aunt (CS1) geen cadeau (no US), tante en vriend (CS1CS2) samen wel cadeau (US), je verwacht een cadeau (US) als vriend (CS2) langskomt
31
Q

contiguity

A

-learning wil occur regardless of whether reinforcement is given, as long as the CS and the response occur togehter

32
Q

Second order conditioning

A
  • once a predictor can elicit a reliable CR through this association with another stimulus, that predictor can act as outcome for other potential predictors
  • bel+shock tot response
  • licht+ bel
  • licht geeft response ookal is het nooit direct geassocieerd met US (shock)
33
Q

Rachman’s three pathways to fear

A
  • classical conditioning
  • vicarious-observational: observing fears of others
  • informational learning: learning that a bite of a snake can poison you