task 3 Flashcards

1
Q

René Descartes

A
  • 1596-1650
  • reasoning: RATIONALISM (deductive)
  • philosophy: DUALISM
  • contributions:
  • -> mathematics (Cartesian geometry & exponential notations)
  • -> philosophy (rationalism/dualism/undeniable existence of thought (“cogito, ergo sum”)
  • impact on science:
  • -> mechanistic world view
  • -> scientifiv study of body
  • -> idea of innate knowledge
  • -> importance of deductive reasoning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

dualism (Descartes)

A
  • view of body-mind relation
  • -> mind is immaterial & independent of body
  • central within religions/Descartes’ world view
  • -> mind influences body
  • human soul was divine:
  • -> human thoughts/feelings cannot be studied by natural sciences
  • -> responsibility of religion and philosophy
  • soul has innate knowledge that could be recovered on basis of reasoning (RATIONALISM)
  • in line with Catholic church’s & Plato’s thoughts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

mechanistic view of universe (inlc. human body)

A
  • everything in material universe can be understood as (complicated) machines
  • rejects notion that things have goals & intentions (= animistic view)
  • universe & matter in it is one big machine created by god
  • human soul = exception: consciousness/volition > subjectivity of human experience

Aristotelian model vs Descartes’ mechanistic view

  • Descartes rejected animistic part:
  • -> everything in the universe is a designed mechanism, made to function independently
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

mechanistic view

–> IMPLICATIONS for advancement of science

A
  • sharp distinction: religion <> science
  • -> protection from each other
  • -> Descartes’ vews primarily benefitted science
  • questioning about how soul could influence body
    –> Descartes suggested via pineal gland > was found to be unconvincing
    » “soul” was put into mechanical part of universe & subject of natural investigation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

monism

A

PHYSICALISM:
- matter > mind

IDEALISM:
- mind > matter

NEUTRAL MONISM:
- 3rd substance > body & mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Isaac Newton

A
  • 1643-1727
  • inspired by Galilei’s studies on trajectory of cannonballs
  • described gravitation and formulated the 3 laws of physics
  • “princia mathematica” (1687)
  • -> Newton presented his achievements (laws of physics)

IMPACT:

  • showed that science could uncover the mechanisms underlying reality
  • seemed to suggest that all scientific knowledge can be summarised in mathematical laws
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

epistemology

A

EPISTEMOLOGY:

- branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

epistemology

|&raquo_space; rationalism

A

RATIONALISM:

  • knowledge is obtained by means of reasoning
  • based on innate knowledge (nativism)
  • deductive reasoning

> source of knowledge: reason
research method: deductive reasoning
main applications: logic, mathematics
main proponents: Plato, Descartes, Leibniz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

epistemology

|&raquo_space; empiricism

A

EMPIRICISM:

  • knowledge is obtained by means of perceptual experiences (blank slate)
  • uses empirical evidence as formation of ideas
  • inductive reasoning

> source of knowledge: perception
research methods: observation, experimentation, inductive reasoning
main applications: natural sciences
main proponents: natural philosophers, Locke, Berkeley, Hume

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

John Locke

A
  • 1632-1704
  • father of empiricism
  • -> rejected innate ideas

TWO KINDS OF EXPERIENCES:
1. deriving from sensation > sensory input
2. deriving from reflection > mind operates sensations
» reflection without sensation is not possible

TWO KINDS OF IDEAS:
1. simple ideas:
- received passively
- cannot be analysed/reduced (= elemental)
–> sensation & reflection
2. complex ideas:
- mind actively creates new ideas by combining simple ideas
- can be analysed/reduced
» ASSOCIATION: notion that knowledge results from linking simple ideas to form complex ones

TWO KINDS OF QUALITIES:

  1. primary qualities: characteristics in an object that exist whether or not we perceive them > OBJECTIVE (size, shape)
  2. secondary qualities: characteristics that only exist in our perception of the object > SUBJECTIVE (colour, odour, sound, taste)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bishop Berkeley

A
  • 1685-1753
  • first person to raise discussion on idealism versus realism
  • agreed with ideas of empiricism but only believed in secondary qualities (Locke)
    » mentalism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

mentalism

A
  • all knowledge is a function of mental phenomena
  • -> depends on the person perceiving/experiencing
  • perception is subjective
  • -> does not mirror external world
  • all experience is within us > we never know exactly the physical nature of objects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

epistemology

|&raquo_space; idealism vs. realism

A
  • in its extreme form, empiricism leads to idealism (contrasted by realism)
  • -> Berkeley & Hume

IDEALISM:
- human knowledge is construction of mind
- it does not necessarily correspond to an outside world
» truth of knowledge: depends on coherence with rest of knowledge in social group

REALISM:
- human knowledge tries to reveal real properties of the outside world
» truth of knowledge: determined by correspondence of knowledge with real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kant

A

sought to reconcile rationalism & empiricism:

  • argued that mind imposes structure on incoming sensory experiences
  • it requires coherent & constant input to make sense out of it

> agreed with Berkeley/Hume:
- we cannot have direct knowledge of outside reality through perception
but wanted to proof:
- perception is much richer than stated by them two
- such perception can only exist in a world of things that is not in contradiction with it

makes two points:

  1. humans not only perceive, they also think about their perceptions
  2. human perception cannot arise in environment at odds with sensations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hume & Berkeley on empiricism

A

BERKELEY:
- something is purely based on impressions acquired through observation > no guarantee that it is a faithful interpretation of the world

HUME:
- causes are never observed directly > they are derived from experiencing co-occurrence of phenomena

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Kant

|&raquo_space; makes two points to support his theory

A
  1. HUMANS NOT ONLY PERCEIVE, THEY ALSO THINK ABOUT THEIR PERCEPTIONS
    - combination of input from senses with understanding > JUDGEMENTS (goes beyond basic experiences)
    - -> in doing so, MIND ADDS KNOWLEDGE to sensations, considered innate
    - -> knowledge added by mind: those of TIME, SPACE, CAUSE-EFFECT
  2. HUMAN PERCEPTION CANNOT ARISE IN ENVIRONMENT COMPLETELY AT ODDS WITH SENSATIONS
    - even if sensations are subjective, they can only exist if perceiver live in world that is IN LINE WITH INPUT from senses
17
Q

enlightenment

A
  • 18th century
  • autonomous thinking & observation became advocated as primary sources of knowledge
  • -> rather than reliance on authorities
  • positivism
18
Q

positivism

A
  • authentic knowledge can only be provided by scientific method
  • religion and philosophy as inferior forms of explanation

> science was only source of true knowledge
only objects of knowledge were observable facts & scientific laws

main proponent: Comte

19
Q

Auguste Comte

A
  • 1798-1857
  • one of the founders of SOCIOLOGY
  • believed that science should become religion
  • -> set up “religion of humanity”
  • proposed LAW OF 3 STAGES:
    –> hypothesis that civilisations go through 3 stages:
    1. THEOCRATIC STAGE:
  • gods & spirits dominate culture
  • marks transition from animism -> polytheism -> monotheism
    2. METAPHYSICAL STAGE:
  • philosophical explanations dominate
    3. POSITIVISTIC STAGE:
  • explanations provided by natural sciences dominate
    » society reached maturity when scientific explanations become motor of progress
20
Q

counterforces of enlightenment

A
  1. roman catholic church
  2. protestant church
  3. humanities
  4. romantic movement

HOW ORGANISATIONS TRIED TO INCREASE THEIR POWER IN SOCIETY
> through CONFLICT & OPPRESSION when group is too strong
> through ALLIANCE FORMATION with other groups when it is perceived as instrumental to achieve own goals
> through EXCLUSION OF INDIVIDUALS who do not belong to group, denounced as “unqualified”

21
Q

counterforces of enlightenment

|&raquo_space; ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH

A
  • first institute to CHALLANGE SCIENCE’S ASCENT
  • was most powerful organisation in Europe > had to DEFEND ITS POSITION
  • suggested that scientific knowledge detracted individuals from real wisdom
  • dangerous if not restraint by religious morals
  • SOCIETY OF JESUS/JESUITS (1540):
    –> new religious order that combined strong intellectual passion with highly effective organisation
    » establishment of secondary schools, universities, training seminaries with many forms of education (incl. sciences) being taught
22
Q

counterforces of enlightenment

|&raquo_space; PROTESTANT CHURCH

A
  • still had to establish their power base > science as ally rather than adversary
  • suggested that scientific knowledge was dangerous if not guided by religion
  • -> without religion > no restraining force of religious & moral discipline > people use knowledge in misdirected combinations
  • churches had good relationship with science until 1870
  • -> scientists started reacting against patronising attitude of church authorities
23
Q

counterforces of enlightenment

|&raquo_space; HUMANITIES

A

[outside religion: large segment of population that preferred to keep away from scientific realm]

  • academic discipline that continued traditional study of ancient classics, supplemented with teachings of contemporary literature/art
  • studied HUMAN CONDITION on basis of reading, thought, emotion
  • suggested that is was an illusion to think that human social life could be built on reason alone
  • -> breach of traditions > tare apart social tissue & make people unsettled
24
Q

counterforces of enlightenment

|&raquo_space; ROMANTIC MOVEMENT

A
  • late 1700’s - early 1800’s
  • reacted against mechanistic world view & emphasises on reason preached by Enlightenment
  • universe a changing organism
  • stressed everything that deviated from rationalism
  • closer to humanities than natural philosophers
  • -> however, research showed that interactions between Romantics and men of science were rich and ambivalent
25
the two cultures of enlightenment
- first half of 20th century - -> division between science & religion increased - Charles Snow (1956): > regretted this separation and saw it as a LOSS FOR SOCIETY > both cultures had a lot to learn from each other > appealed for more communication by INCLUDING BOTH SIDES IN SCHOOL CURRICULUM
26
precursors to scientific psychology
1. individualisation in western societies 2. philosophical studies of the mind 3. epistemology 4. rational & empirical psychology
27
precursors to scientific psychology | >> INDIVIDUALISATION IN WESTERN SOCIETIES
- trend towards looser social relations & greater focus by individuals on themselves than on groups they belong to - people derive self-image & self-esteem from OWN QUALITIES & ACCOMPLISHMENTS - -> rather than from position of family in society - started around end of middle ages and is still going - four factors that contributed to individualisation: 1. INCREASED COMPLEXITY IN SOCIETY > increased urbanisation & industrialisation put people into more complex and competitive social networks > as number of occupations & trades grew, people felt greater need to position themselves relative to others 2. INCREASED CONTROL BY THE STATE > people were told that society gathered & stored more and more information about individuals 3. INDIVIDUALS PROMOTED BY CHRISTIANITY > religion put emphasis on solitary individual --> because each person's private state of faith & relation to god is seen as essence of devotion 4. INCREASED AVAILABILITY OF MIRRORS, BOOKS, LETTERS > mirrors -> people were more aware of themselves and impressions they made on others > before, adventures were center of stories -> then, characters took that role > letter writing became more common -> rise to "familiar letters" in which people explore, express, share intimate experiences
28
precursors to scientific psychology | >> PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES OF MIND
- in 17th century: great revival of philosophical thinking - -> focused on EPISTEMOLOGY & PSYCHOLOGY rather than on Plato & Aristotle - RATIONALISM vs. EMPIRICISM
29
precursors to scientific psychology | >> EPISTEMOLOGY
- Berkeley & Hume - -> IDEALISM vs. realism - Kant - -> RECONCILIATION OF RATIONALISM & EMPIRICISM - SCOTTISH COMMON SENSE: > Berkeley and Hume's idealism was put aside > REID believed that separation of mind & reality was out of control --> wanted philosophy to go back to Aristotelian view of perception --> saw perception as direct interaction between perceiver & real object -> raw material of experience is object themselves >> "you see and therefore there must be" CRITICS: - no evidence/proof
30
precursors to scientific psychology >> RATIONAL & EMPIRICAL PSYCHOLOGY --> WOLFF
WOLFF - important moment in rise of psychology: - -> publication of two books about the distinction between rational & empirical psychology - -> Wolff took ideas from Aristotle (Axioms), Bacon, Newton > RATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: - starts from self-evident truths (axioms) & on the basis of deductive reasoning - -> lead to demonstration of new knowledge - approach guaranteed true conclusions about human soul & allowed for more involvement than just simple observations - Wolff thought pure reasoning entailed risk of error > psychology needed interaction between reasoning & observation > EMPIRICAL PSYCHOLOGY: - built on introspection - -> human mind could perceive its own operations and use this information to build science of psychology >> Wolff suggested usage of mathematical demonstration: PSYCHOMETRIA (Newton)
31
precursors to scientific psychology >> RATIONAL & EMPIRICAL PSYCHOLOGY --> KANT & COMTE
KANT: - argued that psychology could not be proper natural science for these reasons: 1. outcome of introspection could not be formulated in mathematical laws 2. inner observations could not be separated & recombined at will 3. act of introspection changed state of observed mind COMTE - denied the scientific status of psychology - proponent of positivism - psychology was excluded from hierarchy of sciences because of problems with introspective method - -> argued that introspection as scientific method was flawed -> impossible for one person to reason & observe oneself reason - -> claimed thath human mind could be studied scientifically on physiology & on products of the human mind COMTE'S HIERARCHY of six sciences: Mathematics > Astronomy > Physics > Chemistry > Biology > Sociology
32
philosophical influences on psychology
- 17th century - philosophy = spirit of mechanism CLOCKWORK UNIVERSE - scholars attempted to define & describe every phenomenon by assigning it numerical values - -> TIME > DETERMINISM: - doctrine that acts are determined by past events - -> understanding of order & regularity with which its part function > predict changes that will occur in operation of clock (universe) > REDUCTIONISM: - doctrine that explains phenomena on one level in terms of phenomena on another level - -> physical universe could be understood by analysing or reducing it to its simplest parts (molecules/atoms)
33
mechanism
- doctrine that natural processes are mechanically determined - -> capable of explanation by the law of physics & chemistry NEWTON: - suggested that movement was communicated by forces that acted to attract & repel atoms - universe consists of atoms in motion > every physical effect follow from a direct cause - -> must be subject to laws of measurement & should be predictable
34
sociology
- study of society - -> social relationships - -> social interactions - -> culture in everyday life
35
David Hartley
- 1705-1757 - agreed with Locke that all ideas are derived from experiences conveyed through senses > FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF ASSOCIATION: - ideas/sensations that occur together become associated - -> occurrence of one is connected with that of the other - REPETITION: - -> the more frequently two ideas occur together, the more readily the will be associated - men & machine: - -> suggested that our nerves were solid structures & vibrations of nerves transmitted impulses from one part of body to another
36
derived vs innate ideas | --> Descartes
DERIVED: - produced by direct implication of external stimulus >> product of experiences of senses INNATE: - arise from mind/consciousness - independently of sensory experiences/external stimuli >> independent of sensory experiences