Test 1 Flashcards

(83 cards)

1
Q

correlation research

A

statistical method assessing association between variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

experimental research

A

manipulating a variable - cause & effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

independent variable (IV)

A

variable researcher manipulates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

levels

A

IV=light, the levels are dark or light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

dependent variable (DV)

A

variable being measured - depends on IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

5 Moral Principles

A

1) respect for persons (informed consent)
2) risk/benefit analysis
3) justice (ppl in study should benefit from results)
4) trust (confidentiality)
5) fidelity/scientific integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

active deception

A

intentionally providing false information or misleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

passive deception

A

withholding crucial information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STUDY: Real vs Imagined Gender Harassment (Woodzicka & LaFrance)

A

Study 1: imagined responses to harassment - asked how they’d feel
Result: most imagined they’d be confrontational

Study 2: creating sexual harassment in the lab - job interview where male interviewer asked harassing questions
Result: no one refused to answer, few confronted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

spotlight effect

A

belief that others are paying more attention to our appearance/behavior than they really are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

illusion of transparency

A

the illusion that our concealed emotions leak out and can be easily read by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

STUDY: Being nervous about looking nervous

A
  • Savitsky & Gilovich (2003)
  • wondered if “illusion of transparency” would disrupt inexperienced public speakers
  • 40 students in pairs spoke for 3 min, switched, then rated how nervous they were/partner appeared
    RESULTS: people rated selves as seeming more nervous BUT partners rated not nervous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

self-concept

A

our understanding of who we are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

self-schema

A

beliefs by which we define ourselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social comparisons

A

evaluating one’s abilities and opinions by comparing oneself with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

individualism

A

the concept of giving priority to one’s own goals over group goals and defining one’s identity in terms of personal attributes rather than group identifications
- Western thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

collectivism

A

giving priority to the goals of one’s group and defining one’s identity accordingly
- Eastern/Asian thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

STUDY: Fish bowl - culture & cognition

A
  • when shown underwater study with fish, Americans focus on fish first, Asians more likely to notice the background
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

planning fallacy

A

tendency to underestimate how long a task will take

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

impact bias

A

overestimating the enduring impact of emotion-causing events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

dual attitude system

A

Differing implicit (automatic) and explicit (consciously controlled) attitudes toward the same object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

terror management theory

A

argues humans must find a way to manage overwhelming fear of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

self-efficacy

A

sense that one is competent and effective
- strong self-efficacy = less anxious & depressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

defensive pessimism

A

anticipating problems, anxiety to motivate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
false consensus effect
overestimating commonality of one opinion
26
self-handicapping
protecting self through deprecating behaviors
27
working self concept
self schemas presently active in thought/memory
28
independent (individualistic) emphasis on:
- internal abilities - uniqueness/expressing self - being direct in communication
29
interdependent (collectivistic) emphasis on:
- external, public features (status, role, relationship) - belong & fitting in - occupying status in community - indirect in communication
30
3 Functions of the Self"
1) organizational - self concept made of schemas (helps organize) 2) emotional - self helps determine emotional responses 3) executive - self control
31
looking glass self theory (Cooley 1902)
we are who others think we are
32
social comparison theory (Festinger)
we learn about ourselves through comparison to others
33
self serving bias
we pay attention to info consistent with self concept
34
System 1 (automatic processing)
functions automatically, intuition, gut feeling - also called Automatic Processing
35
System 2 (controlled processing)
deliberate, controlled, conscious thinking - also called controlled processing
36
priming
activating particular associations in memory - things we don't even consciously notice but subtly influence how we recall events
37
embodied cognition
mutual influence of bodily sensations on cognitive preferences & social judgement
38
intuitive judgements
our thinking is partly automatic & partly controlled
39
confirmation bias
tendency to search for information that confirms preconceptions ex: picking news sources to align with beliefs
40
representative heuristic
to judge someone by intuitively comparing it to our mental representation
41
availability heuristic
the more easily we recall something, the more likely it is to be true
42
counterfactual thinking
imagining alternative scenarios & outcomes that might have happened EX: bronze medalists exhibit more joy than silver
43
illusory correlation
perception of a relationship where in reality there is none
44
STUDY: The Pill Study (Nisbett & Schachter) -often ignore enviro factors that had big impacts
- students asked to take series of shocks of increasing intensity - IV: before, 1/2 students given fake pill they were told would produce anxiety - DV: looked at how much shock they would take RESULTS: people who took the pill withstood 4x more shock, BUT denied the pill had any impact
45
STUDY: Nisbett & Wilson
- participants watch film & told they will be tested - IV: 1/2 participants heard a power saw outside the lab room while watching film - DV: participants asked how much they think the noise effected their performance RESULT: noise had no real impact on scores but all thought it did
46
2 Factor Theory of Emotion (Schacter)
1) experience physiological arousal 2) look to cues in environment to explain arousal
47
STUDY: Shaky Bridge Study (Dutton & Aron)
Misattribution of emotion - all male participants - set at park where attractive woman asks them to fil out a questionnaire - after the questionnaire, the woman gives her phone # and says to give her a call - IV: some men meet woman ON shaky bridge others cross bridge & meet 10 min after crossing -DV: what # of men call her and ask her out RESULT: 60% men from bridge called / 30% off bridge called
48
self presentation
attempt to present selves as who we want people to believe we are through words, behavior and actions
49
impression management
conscious/unconscious orchestration of presentation to fit social goals
50
belief perserverance
persistence of initial conceptions, even when discredited
51
misinformation effect
people incorporate misinformation into memory of the event after witnessing it
52
attribution theory
how we explain others behavior/ what we infer from it ex: internal or external causes
53
dispositional attribution
attributing behavior to the persons disposition and traits
54
Kelley's Covariation Model
- explains if people decide to make internal or external variation 1) consensus - how is everyone responding to stimuli 2) distinctiveness - how one actor behaves 3) consistency - behavior between actor & stimuli is consistent
55
internal attribution
WHY is about the other persons actions (dispositional)
56
external attribution
WHY is about environment (situational)
57
fundamental attribution error
tendency to overestimate extent people's behavior is because of internal factors & underestimate situational factors
58
STUDY: Castro Study (Jones & Harris)
- students asked to read an essay from a student - essay either for or against Castro's rule & students asked to guess how author feels about Castro - condition 1: author given free choice to right for/against - condition 2: author told to write for or against IV: what students were told about conditions of paper DV: how much do you believe that author does/doesn't support Castro RESULTS: found similar results whether told author had/didn't have a choice
59
STUDY: Fiske & Taylor
- actor A & B have scripted conversation with 50/50 talking - observers sat in chairs at different angles & asked how much they thought each actor spoke RESULT: observers facing both said 50/50 BUT those facing A OR B said actor they were facing as having spoken more
60
ABCs of Attitude
Affect (feelings) Behavior tendency Cognition (thoughts)
61
Alan Wicker
studied variety of people & found people expressed attitude HARDLY predicted behavior
62
when attitudes predict behavior:
- minimal other influences on what we say/do - attitude is specific to the behavior - when attitude is potent
63
implicit-association test (IAD)
used to measure implicit attitudes - uses reaction times to measure speed people associate concepts
64
STUDY: Stanford Prison Study (Zimbardo)
- question of is prison brutality b/c of prisoners or role of guards? - college men volunteered to stay in simulated prison - 1/2 guards & 1/2 prisoners - had to stop after 6 days b/c students fell so heavily into roles
65
STUDY: Killing Begets Killing (Andy Martens)
- would killing a few bugs increase a students willingness to kill bugs after trial? - those who thought they killed bugs killed more bugs during time period after study
66
self presentation
impression management - caring what others think
67
cognitive dissonance
tension arises when two of our thoughts or beliefs are inconsistent
68
selective exposure
tendency to seek information & media that agrees with one's views & beliefs
69
insufficient justification
relieving dissonance by internally justifying behavior when external doesn't
70
self-perception theory
looking at our behavior as someone else might when we're unsure of our attitudes
71
over-justification effect
result of bribing people to do what they already doing - takes away the enjoyment
72
STUDY: Thin slices of behavior (Ambady & Rosenthal)
- gave students 30 sec SILENT clips of professor's lectures & had them rate the professors personal qualities (enthusiastic, teaching ability, etc) - reliable ratings (consensus) - rating were significant predictors of end-of-term evals - rating still accurate when clips shortened as much as 5 seconds
73
verbal communication channels
- verbal - paralinguistic (tone) - nonverbal (body language)
74
visible communication channels
- facial expressions - eye contact - body language/gestures
75
STUDY: South Fore People (Ekman & Friesen)
- South Fore: preliterate tribe with no western contact - told Fore brief stories with emotional content then showed pictures of americans expressing the 6 emotions all know - asked to match expressions to stories - Fore asked to demonstrate expressions that match emotional stories - brought to americans who accurately decoded emotions
76
6 Universal Emotions
- anger -sadness - fear - disgust - surprise - happiness
77
STUDY: Late Bloomer Study (Rosenthal & Jacobson)
self fulfilling beliefs - students given placement tests with false results reported - teachers told 1/2 randomly selected would be 'bloomers' - observed class dynamics & tested kids at end of year RESULT: 'bloomers' bloomed
78
Rosenthal 4 Factor Theory - Bloomer Study
1) climate - warmer to bloomers 2) input - more attention on bloomers 3) output - bloomers given more opportunities 4) feedback - bloomers given more informative feedback
79
STUDY: Attitudes/Behavior Inconsistency (LaPiere)
- early 1930s LaPiere went on cross country trip with Chinese couple (Chinese prejudice common at time) - went to 251 establishments, only 1 refused them service - after trip - wrote each business asking if they would serve Chinese guests - of responses, 1 said they would provide service (90% would not)
80
STUDY: Woodzicka & LaFrance (2001)
- looked at anticipated vs actual responses to gender harassment
81
Affective forecasting
predicting specific emotion/durability of future
82
Dual Attitude System
- controlled/explicit (System 2) - automatic/implicit (System 1)
83
Study: Fazio
- had people rate feelings toward different candy bars - attitude based on reaction time