test 3 Flashcards

(45 cards)

1
Q

social dominance orientation

A

motivation to have one’s group dominate other social groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

realistic group conflict theory

A

theory that prejudice arises from competition between groups for scarce resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

social identity

A

the “we” aspect of self-concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ingroup

A

“us”
- group of people who share sense of belonging, common identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

outgroup

A

“them”
- group people perceive as different from their group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

consequences of prejudice

A
  • subtyping
  • subgrouping
  • stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

STUDY: Thai et al.
Friends with moral credentials

A
  • belief that minority friendships make one look less racist
    IV:
    1) the statement on the Facebook profile (2 levels)
    2) the visual picture on the profile (3 levels)
    3) observers (2 levels)

DV:
1) how racist the target was seen
2) perceived negative intent
3)level of offensiveness
4) neg. affect toward statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

automatic processing

A

we seek patterns & categorize things and people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

stereotyping

A

cognitive component
- generalization of a group where indiv characteristics are given to all in group regardless of actual variations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

prejudice

A

affective (emotional) component
- neg or pos attitude toward group of people based only on membership in group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

discrimination

A

behavioral component
- unjustified neg or pos action towards group based on group membership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

STUDY: Tajfei & Turner
Minimal Group Paradigm

A
  • show slides with lots of dots & guess # of dots
  • tell based on info if you over or underestimated - results made up
  • then, 2 groups play game together
    - stereotypes quickly emerged within groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

is implicit or explicit prejudice greater today?

A

Explicit in US has increased dramatically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

implicit bias

A

operates OUTSIDE of awareness
- having preference for a group based on implicit attitudes, stereotypes, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

IAT knee tapping instructions

A

(Implicit association task - Greenwald & Banaji)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

aggression as biological phenomenon

A

-influences:
instinctive
neural
genetic
biochemical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

frustration aggression theory

A

theory that frustration triggers readiness to aggress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

social learning theory

A

we learn social behavior by observing & imitating and rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

STUDY: Albert Bandura
Bobo Doll

A
  • children exposed to adult’s aggression against Bobo doll were likely to reproduce observed aggression
20
Q

2 mental proccessess

A

intentional operating
- conscious / effortful
- unwanted thoughts go away through distraction

ironic monitoroing
- unconscious / little effort
- search for unwanted thoughts being surpressed

21
Q

Contact Hypothesis (Allport 1954)

A
  • contact between members of dif groups will improve relations BUT need:
    1) cooperation
    2) equal status
    3) acquaintance potential (get to know each other)
    4) institutional support
22
Q

teasing vs bullying

A

teasing
- not making fun of characteristics out of someones control
- not meant to harm, from someone close to you

bullying
- 3 components
1) repeated
2) imbalance of power
3) purposeful

23
Q

need to belong

A

motivation to bond with others in relationships that provide pos interactions

24
Q

STUDY: Hatfield (1966)

A
  • 752 students - matching dance
  • aptitude/personality testing - how much did tests predict attraction?

matching phenomenon - tendancy for men/women to choose partners who are ‘good match’ in attractiveness & more

25
Proximity (propinquity)
- how much you interact with someone - the more you interact & see the more likely to be friends
26
STUDY: Festinger (1950)
- looked at married housing complex at MIT & who became friends - 65% reported best friend IN same building - 41% reported next door neighbors were best friend - people near common spaces friends all over building
27
STUDY: Shin et al (3 studies)
1) circle study - how close in proximity people drew close friends on physical circle 2) romeo & juliet - all male participants, female confederate IV: distance sitting apart, 80 or 160 cm - read romantic scene from romeo & juliet DV: how much guys reported liking the woman - close condition liked her more 3) closeness & attractiveness - men & women both shown pictures of 2 women where one looked closer - closer woman rated more attractive
28
Mere Exposure
the more exposure to stimulus, the more you like it
29
similarity vs complementary
- similarity attracts more - open vs closed fields - open: can be friends with anyone - closed: brings people together
30
attractiveness
tendency to like people more physically attractive - 'what is beautiful is good' stereotype - more attractive people = more socially fluent
31
passionate vs companionate love
companionate love - feel close, develops, no passion
32
Sternbergs Love Triangle
1) intimacy - feeling close/bonded 2) passion - 'hot' part, arousal, sexual 3) commitment - short & long term - intimacy + passion = romantic love - intimacy + commitment = companionate love (parent - child) - passion + commitment = fatuous love (hookup) - ALL = consummate love
33
love styles
1) eros 2) ludus 3) storge 4) pragma 5) mania 6) agape women = more storge & pragma men = more ludic
34
social exchange theory
cost vs reward
35
STUDY: Strange Situation Task
attachment styles - babies in room with a parent - parents leave room (babies should cry) - look at reaction baby has when parent returns
36
altruism
helping without expecting anything in return
37
prosocial behavior
any act performed with goal of benefiting another person
38
theories of helping
- evolutionary psychology (biological) - social norms (sociological) - social exchange theory (psych)
39
evolutionary psychology
people are more likely to help those in family more
40
reciprocity norm
expectation that helping others will result in you getting help later
41
social responsibility norm
expectation people will help those dependent on them
42
social exchange theory
aim to maximize rewards and minimize costs - only when pros outway cons
43
Batson's Empathy Altruism Hypothesis
1) observe 2) empathy? no - social exchange yes - will help (altruism)
44
STUDY: "Carol" (Batson)
- intro to psych students told to evaluate different radio shows (actually listening to same program by Carol Macey about hardship) - participants get note from carol to student asking for help catching up at school IV: empathy (high vs low) & costs of helping - empathy: induce or remove empathy from situation - cost: see carol every day if you did/didn't help - empathy induce felt sympathy - if empathy helped regardless of cost
45