Test 1 Flashcards
(60 cards)
Popper’s falsification approach to science
We accept something until we find it to be incorrect
Ways of acquiring knowledge: authority
It’s this way because I said so
Ways of acquiring knowledge: tenacity
Superstition, longetivity (habit), familiarity (exposure)
Ways of acquiring knowledge: empiricism
Relying solely on the senses
Ways of acquiring knowledge: rationalism
Philosophy
Ways of acquiring knowledge: expert
Presents data and let’s you decide
Ways of acquiring knowledge: intuition
Common sense (common experience), mysticism (mystical)
Ways of acquiring knowledge: science
Combines rationalism and empiricism
Independent variable
The variable we manipulate
Dependent variable
The variable we measure
Confounding variable
variable that could confuse results
History confound
Anything external to the study that could happen a cross the time frame (ex: 9/11 happening between pre and post testing)
Maturation confound
Happens within the individual
Testing/sequencing confound
Repeated testing can cause practice effect or fatigue effect
Practice effect and fatigue effect
Repeated testing can cause the participant to get better because because of practice; repeated testing can cause the participant to get worse because they’re worn out
Instrumentation confound
Whatever you use in the experiment; reasons for observer training
Subject and experimenter effect confound
The participant figures out what the study is about (because of demand characteristics) which can bias their behavior; the experiment has a hypothesis made which might influence how they see things
Statistical regression confound
Someone tests really low or really high the 1st time, the next time they’ll test closer to the mean
Selection confound
The way the sample was selected or put in groups is biased; sample doesn’t represent the general population; something that’s different between experimental and control groups
Mortality confound
People drop out of the study
Type I error
Saying there is a difference when there isn’t; rejecting the null hypothesis when the null is true
Type II error
Saying there is no difference when there is; failing to reject the null when the null is false
Null hypothesis
There will be no difference between the groups; statistical analyses always test the null
What kind of hypothesis has one tail and why?
A directional hypothesis because it says the IV will either increase or decrease the DV; there are only two options