Test 2 Flashcards
(42 cards)
Non-systematic attrition
Dropout more equally across groups
Systematic attrition
More people drop out of one group than another
Issues with BS designs
Comparable treatment of groups; sensitivity of DV; control techniques; differential attrition; diffusion/imitation of treatments; compensatory equalization; compensatory rivalry; resentful demoralization
Ceiling effect
The IV is meant to increase scores but pretest scores are so high you can’t continue; control with pretesting
Floor effects
The IV is meant to decrease scores but pretest scores are so low you can’t continue; control with pretesting
Single blind study
The participant doesn’t know which group they’re in but the experimenter does
Double blind study
Neither the participant or the experimenter knows which group they’re in
Diffusion of treatments
Participants tell possible participants the true IV
Compensatory equalization
The control group and the experimental group communicate and the control wants what the experimental is getting and demand equal treatment
Compensatory rivalry
Example of the kids without computers in school, the kids without them work harder because they don’t have the IV and want to prove themselves to earn the IV
Resentful demoralization
The participants give up and don’t do anything
What test to use for a single factor two group design
Independent samples t test
What test to use for single factor multiple groups design
Use between subjects ANOVA
Characteristics of within subjects designs
Smaller sample size, reduced error variance, order effects (carryover effects, practice effects, fatigue effects)
Carryover effects
Something in a previous part of the study carries over into another part of the study
Practice effect
The participants improve because of repeated testing
Fatigue effect
Participants do progressively worse because of repeated testing
Counterbalancing
Controls for order and carryover effects
Complete counterbalancing
Every participant gets the variables in every order possible
Intrasubject counterbalancing
Every subject gets the condition in every order; type of complete counterbalancing
Counterbalancing for linear order effects
ABBA = 0123 -> equal increments
For nonlinear order effects
ABBABAAB = 02340234; 1/2 subjects do ABBA and 1/2 do BAAB
Incomplete counterbalancing
Ss don’t do all sequences, only some; each treatment must appear in each position an equal number of times; each treatment must precede and be followed by each treatment an equal number of times
Balanced Latin square
ABCD
BCDA
CDAB
DABC
Only works for an even number of conditions; 1, 2, n, 3, n-1, 4, n-2, 5