Test 2 Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

Non-systematic attrition

A

Dropout more equally across groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Systematic attrition

A

More people drop out of one group than another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Issues with BS designs

A

Comparable treatment of groups; sensitivity of DV; control techniques; differential attrition; diffusion/imitation of treatments; compensatory equalization; compensatory rivalry; resentful demoralization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ceiling effect

A

The IV is meant to increase scores but pretest scores are so high you can’t continue; control with pretesting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Floor effects

A

The IV is meant to decrease scores but pretest scores are so low you can’t continue; control with pretesting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Single blind study

A

The participant doesn’t know which group they’re in but the experimenter does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Double blind study

A

Neither the participant or the experimenter knows which group they’re in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Diffusion of treatments

A

Participants tell possible participants the true IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Compensatory equalization

A

The control group and the experimental group communicate and the control wants what the experimental is getting and demand equal treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Compensatory rivalry

A

Example of the kids without computers in school, the kids without them work harder because they don’t have the IV and want to prove themselves to earn the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Resentful demoralization

A

The participants give up and don’t do anything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What test to use for a single factor two group design

A

Independent samples t test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What test to use for single factor multiple groups design

A

Use between subjects ANOVA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Characteristics of within subjects designs

A

Smaller sample size, reduced error variance, order effects (carryover effects, practice effects, fatigue effects)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Carryover effects

A

Something in a previous part of the study carries over into another part of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Practice effect

A

The participants improve because of repeated testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Fatigue effect

A

Participants do progressively worse because of repeated testing

18
Q

Counterbalancing

A

Controls for order and carryover effects

19
Q

Complete counterbalancing

A

Every participant gets the variables in every order possible

20
Q

Intrasubject counterbalancing

A

Every subject gets the condition in every order; type of complete counterbalancing

21
Q

Counterbalancing for linear order effects

A

ABBA = 0123 -> equal increments

22
Q

For nonlinear order effects

A

ABBABAAB = 02340234; 1/2 subjects do ABBA and 1/2 do BAAB

23
Q

Incomplete counterbalancing

A

Ss don’t do all sequences, only some; each treatment must appear in each position an equal number of times; each treatment must precede and be followed by each treatment an equal number of times

24
Q

Balanced Latin square

A

ABCD
BCDA
CDAB
DABC

Only works for an even number of conditions; 1, 2, n, 3, n-1, 4, n-2, 5

25
Balanced Latin square reversed
For odd number of conditions, cannot control for nonlinear carryover effects ``` ABECD DCEBA BCADE EDACB CDBEA AEBDC DECAB BACED EADBC CBDAE ```
26
What does a true experiment have?
Manipulation (IV), measurement (DV), comparison (different groups), and control
27
Characteristics of IV
Create treatment conditions with levels; manipulate by: presence or absence, different amounts, and type
28
Controlling extraneous variables
Hold constant across conditions/groups so everyone has the same amount, control with randomization
29
Randomization
Theoretically controls all extraneous variables
30
Matching
Match individuals in one group with another; types: constancy, precision control ('twins'), frequency precision control
31
Reactivity/ Hawthorne effect
People react differently because they knew they were being watched (example of the lightbulb factory); can we really generalize to people who haven't experienced this?
32
Confounding variables
Variable that can confuse the results
33
History confound
Anything external to the study that could happen across time frame of study
34
Maturation confound
Happens within the individual
35
Testing/sequencing confound
Repeated testing can cause practice effect or fatigue effect
36
Instrumentation confound
Whatever you use in the experiment; reasons for observer training
37
Subject and experimenter effect confound
The participant figures out what the study is about through the demand characteristics which can bias their behavior; the experimenter has a hypothesis made which can influence how they see things
38
Statistical regression confound
Participants test really high or really low the first time, they will test closer to the mean the second time
39
Selection confound
The way the sample was selected or assigned to groups is biased; sample doesn't represent the general population
40
Mortality confound
People drop out of the study
41
Manipulation check
A question that makes sure the IV is having the intended effect; goes at the end of the survey
42
Characteristics of between subjects designs
Larger sample size, equivalent groups (random assignment, matching), potential confounds (experimenter bias, demand characteristics, instrumentation, mortality/attrition)