Test 1 Flashcards
(99 cards)
Why isn’t introspection sufficient? Reason 1
- Vision is effortless
- Memory is a slightly blurred replica of of the past
- Humans think logically owing to language and consciousness
Titchener’s instrospection
Use the first word that comes to mind
Potter: vision is efficient
Simons: vision is coarse
Both were right
Potter: RSVP results replicate, gist comprehension is fast
Simons: change blindness replicable, visual details are hard to retain
Gist vs detail
to humans: comprehending first is easier than remembering visual details
to computers: perhaps the opposite is terue
Why isn’t introspection sufficient? Reason 2
- disagreements between different individuals, regarding different aspects of mental capacity: visual perception of gist vs. detail
- many though processes occur outside of conscious awareness: neglect patients
- conscious introspection can be misleading: split brain patient
Visual Neglect
neglects left side of space
- copy right half of a figure
- eat the right side of her plate
Split brain patient
Left side controls speech
- Severing the connection between the two hemisphere can relieve severe epilepsy in some patients
- Right demands go to the left hemisphere: patients can answer why they stood up
- Left demands go to the right hemisphere: patient have no access to answer why
The Garcia Effect
Unique solutions are reached only by adding assumptions
- Assumptions are often but not always, correct
- Rats solved this problem by adding assumptions about how the world works
- Stomach illness: taste, not environment
- Physical pain: environment, not taste
Deduction
Begins with a general statement and tries to figure out specific claims that follow from it
- all gorillas are apes - all apes are mammals - all gorillas are mammals
T or F: deduction is syntactic
True
Inductions
Begins with specific facts or observation s and then draws general conclusion from them
- 99 swans have been observed and all of them are white
- All swans are white - false there are black swans
T or F: induction is syntactic
True
What are the 3 assumptions to children’s word learning?
- Taxonomic assumption
- Mutual exclusivity assumption
- Whole object assumption
Taxonomic assumption
Children will extend a new label to something of the same kind rather than to something which is thematically related to the know object
- Same “kind” of object, not same “theme”
Mutual Exclusivity Assumption
Word names are mutually exclusive
- Show the child an apple and an unknown apple
- Experimenter would ask hand me the “mafer”
- The children would hand the experimenter the unknown object
Whole Object Assumption
A novel label is associated with an entire object rather than a part of that object
Fodor’s criteria for modules
- Domain specificity
- Innately specified
- Hardwire
- informational encapsulation
- mandatory
Domain Specificity (Fodor’s criteria)
a module only processes a certain kind of information - frog's bug detector
Innately Specified (Fodor’s criteria)
Genetically determined, not learned
Hardwired (Fodor’s criteria)
Part of the brain is specially designed for this function
Informational Encapculation (Fodor’s criteria)
Only receives input form certain other modules
- knowledge cannot overcome visual illusions
Mandatory (Fodor’s criteria)
works automatically
- e.g. word meaning is processed automatically
- say the color of the word instead of the name of the color
What are the characteristics for Fodor’s criteria
- Fast and efficient
- Automatic
- Critical for survival
What is the consequence of attending to some stimuli and ignoring others?
Attention can change psychological experience even though stimuli remain the same