Test 1 (EBVM 1-12) Flashcards
(153 cards)
What is involved in a PICO?
patient, intervention, comparison, outcome
definition of EBVM
the conscientious and judicious use of the current best evidence in the health care of individuals and populations; integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research
what does EBVM help us do
helps determine which is the BEST approach for the CASE/SITUATION
three main steps of EBVM
-diagnostic process
-treatment alternatives
-disease prevention
what is included in the diagnostic process
diagnostic decisions such as tests and their performance
what is included in treatment alternatives
treatment decisions, interventions and strength of evidence associated with them
what is included in disease prevention
preventative health decisions, herd health and wellness, and causation
what are the 6 steps in the diagnostic process
- presenting complaint
- history
- general inspection
- routine physical exam
- clinical or other tests
- diagnosis!
four LDA treatment options
-right paramedian abomasopexy
-omentopexy
-bar suture (toggle pin) abomasopexy
-roll and treat medically
what are the two highest pieces of evidence
systematic reviews and meta-analysis
three types of observational studies
cross sectional, case control and cohort studies
two type sof experimental studies
experiements and clinical trials (RCTs)
both observational studies and experimental studies are ____ _____ studies
hypothesis testing
what two study types have temporal sequence established
RCTs and cohort studies
what two study types have unknown temporal relationships
cross sectional and case control
advantages of cohort studies (3)
-generally preferred over case control studies bc the are statistically more reliable
-compared to case-control they can establish the timing and sequence of events
-in prospective studies, data collection can be standardized, as opposed to retrospective studies which use historical records
disadvantages of cohort studies (4)
-blinding within the studies is difficult. identifying a matched control group to minimize other variables can also be difficult
-cohort studies arent as reliable as RCTs as the two groups of animals may differ in ways other than simply in respect of the variable under study
-can take a long time to complete and there might be a loss of participants
-not useful for rare diseases as it would be difficult to recruit sufficient patients
what happens in a cohort study
animals exposed to a causal factor are followed over time and compared with another group of animals which are not exposed to that factor.
what are results normally expressed as in a cohort study
risk ratio
can absolute risk be determined in a cohort study
yes
what happens in a case control study
animals which have developed a disease or condition are identified, and their exposure to suspected causal or risk factors is compared with that of a control group which do not have that disease/condition. information regarding exposure is historical
what are results normally expressed as in a case control study
odds ratios
can absolute risk be determined in a case control study
no
advantages of a case control study (4)
-quick to perform and dont require special methods to conduct
-generally inexpensive and may be the only way in which rare conditions or those with a protracted incubation period can realistically be studied
-can be used to evaluate interventions as well as associations
-useful for formulating hypotheses that can be tested using study designs higher up in the hierarchy such as cohorts and RCTs