test 2 Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

purely economic model of news production

A

The probability of an event or issue becoming news goes:
down with cost of uncovering story
down with cost of assembling narrative
up with expected appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Purely journalistic theory of news production

A

The probability of an event or issue becoming news goes:
up w/ expected consequences of narrative
up w/ expected appeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Economics of News:

Gentzkow and Shapiro

A

Not an empirical paper (just theoretical)
Question: When do we get the “truth?”
(Again, difficult to study b/c don’t have exogenous shocks.)
 Competition increases truth. (Easier to bribe off only a few
firms.)
 Diversity increase truth. (Can see both sides of the coin.) A
suppresser will be revealed by their competitors.
 Competition increases investment in news gathering.
However, this can increase selected viewership and soft news.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

U.S. media tends to be:

A

More often privately owned
-PBS receives about 15% of its funding from the government
-NPR receives about 10%
-Many other countries have one station almost fully funded (TV tax)
Less regulated
-Over content. Europe now less regulated.
-Airwaves in the U.S. are owned by the public and licensed for use by private entities

-Differences blurred by new media, cable, satellite, and internet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The First Amendment

A

Previously discussed colonial press freedom
Zenger trial made seditious libel (written anti-government messages) prosecutions much more difficult
Constitution written without explicit protection of free speech
Federalist argument: opposed a Bill of Rights b/c worried that enumerating rights would limit them
Bill of Rights added four years after ratification
Applied to state governments through 14th Amendment in the 1920s(“incorporation”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Thomas Jefferson on the Function of the Press

A

“[W]ere it left to me to decide whether we should have a government
without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not
hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every
man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. I am
convinced that those societies (as the Indians) which live without
government enjoy in their general mass an infinitely greater degree of
happiness than those who live under European governments. Among the
former, public opinion is in the place of law, and restrains morals as
powerfully as laws ever did any where. Among the latter, under pretense
of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves
and sheep. I do not exaggerate. This is a true picture of Europe. Cherish
therefore the spirit of our people, and keep alive their attention. Do not
be too severe upon their errors, but reclaim them by enlightening them.
If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and
Congress, and Assemblies, judges and governors shall all become
wolves.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the First Amendment Mean?

A

Sounds pretty straightforward:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
No prior restraint.
Long understood to not protect certain types of speech (e.g. fine
line between conduct and speech; sometimes speech bumps into
other rights; obscenity)
Constitutional interpretation varies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common Law

A

English common law was adopted by the U.S. colonies. Still
cited in some states, many Supreme Court cases.
Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England
(1765). Clarified English laws. Read in law school.
“Where blasphemous, immoral, treasonable, schismatical,
seditious, or scandalous libels are punished by English law, the
liberty of the press, properly understood, is by no means
infringed or violated. The liberty of the press is indeed essential
to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no
previous restraints upon publication, and not in freedom from
censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has
undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the
public; to forbid this is to destroy the freedom of the press: but
if he publishes what is improper, mischievous, or illegal, he
must take the consequences of his own temerity.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Modern Law

A

-Near v. Minnesota (1931): struck down state
law that allowed gov’t to prohibit publication
of newspapers that were “malicious,
scandalous, and defamatory” and required
court approval to restart publication.
-But prohibition wasn’t “absolutely unlimited,”
and gov’t could limit publication of troop
movements, obscenity, and incitement to
violence.
-Pentagon Papers (1971) expanded gov’t burden
before prior restraint would be allowed (can’t
just say “national security”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example: Swift Agreement

A

Terrorist Tracking Finance Program (2001-20016)
Could track SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial
Telecommunication) database.
NY Times obtained information, as did LA Times and WSJ. Legal
program. Democrats and Republicans tried to convince NYT to not
publish. They did anyway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

British have more formal Defense Advisory

Notice system

A

Request editor to not publish information for national security reasons
 All advisory, not legally enforceable
 Generally complied with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

new focus on…

A

sources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Libel

A
Truth is an absolute defense, per
Zenger.
Before 1964, false and defamatory
statements about individuals were
unprotected speech.
Times vs. Sullivan established
“malice” standard. Some falsity
could be tolerated as part of
pursuit of truth.
Put burden of proof on gov’t
officials.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rules governing U.S. news

A

Regulatory:
Broadcast (not cable or internet) focused thus far, with increasing
relaxation over years.
Time limits (1976: at least 5% local, 5% news and public affairs,
10% non-entertainment, limit on ads): Obviously relaxed. Still
some restrictions, for example children’s TV. (What percent can
be ads now?)
Content restrictions: Wardrobe malfunctions. FCC initially fined
CBS over $500k for Superbowl incident. Later repealed.
Licensing: Renewal used to be more difficult. Now more
automatic.
Spectrum allocation: Big deal with HDTV, wifi, cell networks,
etc.; demand for more efficient use of broadcast spectrum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contrast to

Other Countries

A

Strict rules apply to commercial broadcasters in Europe
“Right of Reply” laws: give people criticized a right of access
to answer criticisms.
Germany: any broadcaster with at least 10% market share
must allocate a minimum of 260 minutes airtime/week to
minor parties
Britain: Formal requirements for impartiality (broadcast)
Campaign coverage regulations stricter (free airtime; ad
regulation, news content balance)
Also, direct newspaper subsidies for diversity (e.g., political
parties).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why Pick on Broadcasters?

A

Airwaves belong to the public; broadcasters only licensed to use them
Limited available spectrum.
Interference (gov’ts first role was to regulate frequencies)
Radio and TV more pervasive than print (which can more easily be
shielded – only seen by one person)
Politicians also feared power of radio might be used against them

17
Q

Airwaves belong to the public; broadcasters only licensed to use them
Limited available spectrum.
Interference (gov’ts first role was to regulate frequencies)
Radio and TV more pervasive than print (which can more easily be
shielded – only seen by one person)
Politicians also feared power of radio might be used against them

A

1941 FCC decision: ordered that a “radio broadcaster and …
station should be allowed neither to editorialize nor to take a
stand on any controversial matter.”
Reaction to Boston mayor receiving favorable coverage from local
radio station.
Used license renewal authority to enforce decision

18
Q

We see very few license renewal requests be denied Does this mean the FCC has little power?

A

No, because powerful threat.
License was highly profitable, so stations feared losing them.
Generally self-censored, rather than direct gov’t
intervention.
Internal rules were often stricter than FCC’s.

19
Q

Evolution of “Fairness”

A

Mayflower: “A broadcaster cannot be an advocate”
1948: allowed editorial positions provided the broadcaster
followed “the principles of balance and fairness in
providing time for discussions of controversial issues.”
1950: “Seekout Opposition Rule,” stations had a “duty to
seek out opposing points of views and encourage opposing
views” if a station editorialized on controversial issues.
1959: required that the station make an effort to provide a
“reasonable” opportunity for the expression of opposing
views whenever a station expressed its opinion.
1987, the FCC repealed the Fairness Doctrine entirely.

20
Q

Ownership/Concentration-Owner’s Role

A

Fear: Press used to further owner’s economic or political
interests ahead of those of consumers, especially as
news organizations become part of larger conglomerates
Historical cases where owner’s bias influences content of
news. LOTS of examples (see next slide).
Used to have hypothetical: What if Rupert Murdoch bought
CNN? Now we know: Fox News.
Examples: Partisan press; yellow journalism; endless crosspromotion
of programming.

21
Q

Ownership Regulation

A

Ownership role is controlled by legal rules, especially in
broadcasting (DirecTV/Echostar merger canned by FCC; Murdoch
buyout ok.)
Lots of debate over ownership rules (Gentzkow & Shapiro)
Media companies are often covering/lobbying at same time
Democrats 2004 party platform (NOT 2012): “Because our
democracy thrives on public access to diverse sources of
information from multiple sources, we support measures to
ensure diversity, competition, and localism in media
ownership.”
FCC’s proposed changes provoked more debate and lawsuits

22
Q

Rules Regarding Ownership

A

Mostly affected broadcasters
Could affect print if also owned TV
Early steps included breaking up the dominant
NBC radio networks (which led to the formation
of ABC) and prohibitions on owning local
affiliates.
Telecom Act of 1996 was pretty big deal: Lifted
40-station limit on radio network ownership
(Clear Channel jumped to over 1200 stations)

23
Q

Informal Rules for Journalists: 3 pressures

A

Peer Pressure: Want to be professional, good journalist
Cognitive Pressure: Attitude Bias (next week)
Organizational Pressure: News business must follow
certain routines to work effectively on a day to day basis
(after that)

24
Q

Professions

A

Not every job, historically.
Professions: Doctors, ministers, lawyers, professors, etc. Not every group in society. Many more
today.
Requires: (1) People make money in same way, (2) Membership regulated by professional association,
(3) People outside the organization cannot operate (e.g. must pass bar to operate as an attorney;
must have PhD to be tenure-track professor)
Arguments for:
similar standards, codify proper conduct, prestige (parental pressure?)
Arguments against:
decrease competition, maintain scarcity, shield work from criticism
Professions are “conspiracies against the laity”
–George Bernard Shaw

25
Is Journalism a Profession?
``` Society for Professional Journalists But, can’t control own membership. Organization cannot exclude from profession. • Seldom see journalists fired for violations of ethics ```
26
Journalistic Ethics
Examples in practice. Most organizations have policies. Many at journalism.org. LA Times code of ethics: “Credibility is a newspaper’s most precious asset. It is arduously acquired and easily squandered and can be maintained only if each of us accepts responsibility for it.” Example: Sony leaks reveals a number of ethical violations. • “Finding Your Roots,” PBS genealogy show. Ben Affleck requested his story not be broadcast after found that ancestors were slave-owners in Savannah, Georgia.
27
How can we study norms?
Norms are unwritten rules. Examples: • FDR • Haiti earthquake photos v. Afghanistan/Iraq photos • Dilbert cartoon -We study by examining variation over time and across news outlets, e.g. : • Partisan press encouraged one-sided editorializing • “Ritual of objectivity” in present journalism. Rosenstiel and others imply that increased competition diminishes the power of journalistic professional norms and values. Major change in focus on personal lives of politicians.
28
Evolving Norms: Personal Lives of Politicians
Previously, personal lives were off limits. David Broder (WP):“When I started covering presidential politics in 1960, there was a very clear rule. We dealt with the public life of public officials, and what they did in off hours was their business and not our business. I have to tell you that this was not a terribly altruistic philosophy in the press corps, it was largely an all-male political world, and largely an all-male press world at that time, and there was a lot of sort of mutual protection, I think, involved in this rule." “When I first got on the press bus, in 1960, Bill Lawrence, who was then the senior political correspondent for the New York Times sat down next to me and said, kid, I want you to understand something. And I said, what's that, sir? He said, I want to tell you about the west of the Potomac rule. And the west of the Potomac rule was very simple, you don't talk east of the Potomac about what you see or hear or observe your colleagues doing west of the Potomac. And the same thing was -- generosity was extended to the politicians. So it was a very clubby, self-protective kind of a rule.”
29
Norm broke down with time
Gary Hart was a big break. 88 presidential primary campaign Especially because he dared the press: “Follow me around. I don't care. I'm serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They'll be very bored.”
30
Edwards Affair Timeline
2/06: Edwards and Hunter reportedly flirt at bar 6/06: Hunter starts recording footage of Edwards on trail Fall 06: four staffers fired or resigned; Hunter paid $100k 8/07: Page 6 NY Post “blind” gossip story about a politician who likes to visit NYC “because he has a girlfriend who lives downtown? The pol tells her he'll marry her when his current wife is out of the picture.” 9/07: HuffPo noted Hunter’s videos taken down 10/07: National Enquirer story alleges Edwards was having an affair with an unnamed staffer (HuffPo & NY Mag did related stories) Speaking of prior restraint, Edwards and Elizabeth tried to get the story killed. How? “the Edwards campaign was in damage-control mode, going into overdrive to dissuade the mainstream media from picking up the story, denouncing it as tabloid trash. Their efforts at containing the fallout were remarkably successful. The Enquirer’s exposé gained zero traction in the traditional press and almost none in the blogosphere.” Post Iowa -10/07: Allegations that Edwards fathered child with Hunter Response? Statements denying paternity; devoted aide claimed he was father Still virtually no coverage in other news outlets Clear Edwards wouldn’t win nomination angling for VP or AG in exchange for endorsement of Obama or Clinton July 22: Biggest National Enquirer story: Caught Edwards secretly visiting Hunter and baby at Beverly Hills Hotel Almost no news organizations covered (see July 28 LAT memo in a couple slides) New media (bloggers, cable, late-night hosts) pushed story. Edwards tried a Nightline interview timed to start of summer Olympics in early August. First story mentioning scandal in NYT: August 8, 2008. CNN: August 6
31
Clinton: Interesting Rosenstiel Details
Another example where major evening newscasts & outlets like NYT didn’t want to “touch it,” [preferred return to ignoring private conduct unless it affected public duties] but felt “trapped” & lacked oligopoly. Underscores argument about competition and content Newspapers, local news, “tabloid” news, even competing shows within networks ran with it. Rosenstiel understates degree to which press believed rumors before. (Almost every reporter did believe them beforehand.) Contrast to ROTC/draft letter What was the ROTC/draft letter issue? Why wasn’t it reported? “too complicated for evening news”
32
Objectivity
Objectivity, fairness and balance. 'Objectivity is seeing the world as it is, not how you wish it were.' From LAT: “A fair-minded reader of Times news coverage should not be able to discern the private opinions of those who contributed to that coverage, or to infer that the newspaper is promoting any agenda. A crucial goal of our news and feature reporting – apart from editorials, columns, criticism and other content that is expressly opinionated – is to be nonideological. This is a tall order. It requires us to recognize our own biases and stand apart from them. It also requires us to examine the ideological environment in which we work, for the biases of our sources, our colleagues and our communities can distort our sense of objectivity.”
33
Not Unanimous (Today)
Resurgence of partisanship in the press: many reject objectivity in favor of overt bias (toward the “correct” side).
34
What do we mean by bias?
Bias as an attitude A person or organization’s inclination to favor one side versus the other in a dispute (prejudice in the sense of pre-judging); or cognitive biases. Bias as an outcome News that shows a partial or unfair picture of reality Attitude is neither necessary nor sufficient to produce bias as outcome
35
Three examples of cognitive biases
Passing the ball Switching people Implicit Association Test
36
Cognitive Biases
Distortions in the ways that humans see reality. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases for a daunting list of cognitive biases Example: apophenia (tendency to perceive patterns in random or meaningless data). Inkblots, poll “changes,” trend stories
37
(Dis)Confirmation Biases
Confirmation bias: tendency to search for and interpret information in ways that confirm prior beliefs Disconfirmation biases: tendency to avoid and scrutinize information that contradicts preconceptions Tolstoy (1897): “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slowwitted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him. Often see in politics with partisan biases. Example: Did inflation go up or down during Obama’s seven years in office? DOWN: January 2008: 4.3% September 2015 0.0%