Test: Theft Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

Section 1(1) theft

A

Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

S3(1) appropriation

A

A person assuming rights of the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many rights must D assume and case

A

One, R v Morris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Appropriation can happen even if V consents

A

Lawrence v MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Appropriation happens at one moment in time

A

R v Gomez

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Appropriation can occur from accepting a gift

A

R v Hinks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assumed right to offer property for sale (V was in jail)

A

Pitham v Hehl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does section 3(1) also say

A

There can be initially innocent appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

4(1) Property

A

Money, personal, real, things in action, intangible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bodily fluids also count as property

A

R v Welsh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Corpse does not count as property unless it has a use, medical, education etc

A

R v Kelly and Lindsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Information does not count as property

A

Oxford v Moss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Land can’t be stolen unless

A
  • someone who severs anything considered part of the land from the land
  • a tourist taken a fixture or structure from the land let to him
  • someone legally entrusted to look after the land abuses this power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

S5(1) belonging to another

A

Possession or control of the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

D can steal own property

A

R v Turner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

There was still BTA in… Original owner still had proprietary interest until intention can be filled

A

Rickets v Basildon Magistrates

17
Q

S5(3) - if D receives property and is under a legal obligation to use it in a particular way, that property will still be treated as belonging to the giver

A

Davidge v Burnett

18
Q

S4(4) - If D receives property by mistake and is under a legal obligation to return it, that property will still be treated as belonging to the party who made the mistake

19
Q

S2(1)(a) - D is not dishonest if he believes he had a legal right to deprive the other of the property

20
Q

S2(1)(b) - D is not dishonest if the defendant believes that the owner would have consented if they were aware of the appropriation and its circumstances

21
Q

S2(1)(c) - D is not dishonest if D believes the owner cannot be found taking reasonable steps

22
Q

If D cannot prove an exception must use

23
Q

Ivey test

A

a) decide what D believes the facts of the situation were
b) whether they felt his conduct was dishonest on those facts according to the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people

24
Q

S2(2)

A
  • D may still be dishonest even though he is willing to pay for the property
25
6(1) intention to permanently deprive
Intending to treat the property as ones to deal with regardless of the owners rights
26
Case where D had IPD
DPP v Lavender
27
Case show it must be intention to permanently deprive, temporarily depriving does not count
R v Warner
28
Even if D did intend to return the money he would of permanently deprived the ‘exact’ money from the safe
R v Velumyl
29
S6(1) - when borrowing ends
When something has been kept for such time and circumstances that its outright taking
30
When does... ...say something has been taken for such time/such circumstances? Means when Goodness, virtue and value have been reduced
R v Lloyd
31
Conditional intent is not enough for commuting theft
R v Easom - intention to permanently deprive is based upon condition that V has something worth stealing