The cognitive (r)evolution Flashcards

1
Q

Who challenged Skinner’s operant approaches?

A

> Psychologists, argued the necessity to consider the role of unobservable psychological constructs

> Animal behaviourists - Neobehaviourists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which movement did Edward Tolman represent in the 20th century?
What was his work and hypothesis?

A

Amercian psychologist - Neobehaviourism

  • studied purposive behaviour of animals, wether their choices are cognitive
  • using mazes
  • Latent learning hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Edward Tolman’s latent learning?

A

Learning that is dormant, concealed

  • exposure without reinforcement
  • rapid learning when behaviour is reinforced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why does Edward Tolman’s latent learning hypothesis represent a challenge for operant conditioning models?

A

> Latent learning = learning without reinforcement

> Simplest solution in latent learning is the one including cognition

-> debate behaviourists vs. neobehaviourists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did Edward Tolman and colleagues fit their evidence to the strict, elaborate operant model without using cognitive constructs?

A

They broke the rule of scientific parsimony

- between multiple explanations, the didn’t choose the simplest one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the neobehavioural work of Edward Tolman and colleagues contribute to?

A

The transition from strict behaviourism to cognitivism during early to mid 20th century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the latent learning experiment of Tolman and Honzik (1930)?

A

> Support for idea of latent learning

> 3 groups of rats:

  1. Control: standard operant learning, continuous reinforcement schedule
  2. No reward, reinforcement not contingent on response
  3. Experimental group: ‘delayed reward’ condition

> Complex maze

  • daily exposure for 17 days
  • measure turns to reach food box (errors)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the results of Tolman and Honzik’s latent learning experiment (1930)?

A

> Group 1: control - standard operant learning

  • quick learning over initial days
  • average of 3 errors per run by day 11
  • > expected operant learning with their continuous reinforcement schedule

> Group 2:
- limited learning because of the absence of reward (reinforcement) continent on response

> Group 3:
- same as group 2 for first 11 days
- behaviour changed immediately on day 12 when food placed in maze: accurate path from start to goal
-> they learned information during first 11 days about the maze, which layer dormant until behaviours reinforced
= latent learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What suggested the detour mazes studies conducted by Tolman and Honzik, after the latent learning experiment (1930)?

A

Rats were learning spatial location rather than a specific route
=> internal representation, cognitive map
- used flexibly, according to specific environmental demands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the experimental evidence suggesting cognitive maps in humans (Maguire et al. 2006; Keller and Just, 2015)?

A

> Maguire et al. (2006)
- larger hippocampus in taxi drivers (learn to navigate vs. bus drivers learning fixed routes)

> Keller and Just (2015)

  • structural changes in hippocampus after 45 minutes learning
  • > neuroplasticity
  • > information is stored and available for later use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did Edward Tolman’s cognitive model of latent learning differ from the operant model?

A

> Tolman’s model was seen as stimulus-stimulus associations through an exploration process
- vs. Pavlov’s stimulus-stimulus classical conditionning

> Tolman saw the intervening variable/process as essential to explain observations of latent learning
- vs. radical behaviourists who denied existence of intervening processes, as unnecessary for exploration

> For Tolman: reinforcement drove animal’s behaviour as motivation by prospect of reward
- spatial learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Edward Tolman’s cognitive theory and model?

A

The intervening variables/processes (mediating internal representations) fundamentally transform the input/ouput relationship:

  • stimulus/environment processing; information storing; spatial representation / cognitive map
  • processes to plan and execute an adaptive behavioural response - motivated by reward
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is Edward Tolman’s model of information processing and storage considered today?

A

> As a basis for many cognitive models of animal and human behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is Edward Tolman considered today?

A

As neobehaviourist and major influence of a cognitive behaviourist tradition still present today within cognitive psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is studied in cognitive psychology?

A

> Mental structures
How knowledge is processed to enable adaptive behaviour

= Unobservable entities
- ‘black box’ between input-output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is implied in the idea of “hypothetical constructs” in cognitive psychology?

A

Explicit acknowledgement that we do not know for sure whether these constructs exist or not
- empirically testable models

-> ‘surplus meaning’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How do behaviourists consider the “hypothetical constructs” of cognitive psychology?

A

As unnecessary “intervening variables”

-> no ‘surplus meaning’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does the idea of ‘surplus meaning’ in cognitive psychology represent historically?

A

Answer to criticism of behaviourists in mid 20th century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the meaning of ‘surplus meaning’ in cognitive psychology?

A

We can use induction to position the construct’s existence and use scientific deduction to hypothesise and reveal new knowledge through experiments
-> new theories and models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does Greenwood propose in his work “understanding the Cognitive Revolution in Psychology” (1999)?

A

‘Surplus meaning’ in science is essential to the development of theory and knowledge
- provided it’s open to empirical scrutiny that supports or refutes it

  • theory without ‘surplus meaning’ is closed and sterile
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the 3 cognitive building blocks on which cognitive psychology models are based?

A
  1. Cognitive domains (functions)
    - perception, language, attention, learning, memory, decision making, problem solving, judgement and reasoning, action
    - > Psychology seeks to encompass all of them in an overarching framework
  2. Cognitive structures (forms and representations)
    - knowledge, symbols, images, concepts, interpretations, appraisals, rules/heuristics (conscious/unconscious), schemas, beliefs
  3. Cognitive processes (operations and transformations)
    - association, comparison, discrimination, categorisation, evaluating, appraising, encoding, storing, retrieval
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the link between cognition and the brain?

A

There is no need to assume that a particular cognitive structure or process has an equivalent physical representation within brain structures or systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How did ‘surplus meaning’ launch cognitive neuroscience?

A

It stimulated brain science to investigate the biological basis of cognitive models of navigation and mental maps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What does cognitive neuroscience bring to emerging evidence?

How does that impact on cognitive neuroscience?

A

Confidence that models and theories are correct and that hypothetical constructs have validity

-> Cognitive neuroscience is the fastest growing areas of cognitive science today

25
Q

What did Sternberg study in his work ‘High-speed scanning in human memory’ (1966)?

A

How is symbolic information retrieved from memory?

  • short term memory
  • seconds rather than minutes or hours
  • symbolic info. = numbers
26
Q

What is Sternberg’s ‘Memory scanning’ paradigm (1966)?

A

> Number sequences

  • each sequence: between 1 and 6 digits
  • auditory warning signal after each sequence, followed by presentation of target number
  • when target present, push lever

> Systematic variation of the length of original sequence, and where in the sequence the target number occurred
- target equally distributed over the different positions across all trials

> Limit of accurate recall = immediate memory span

27
Q

What is Sternberg’s empirical question in his ‘Memory scanning’ study (1966)
What were the results?

A

> What is the effect of the length of the list (numbers) on time to decide

> Results: long list = longer reaction time

28
Q

What did the results of Sternberg’s ‘Memory scanning’ study (1966) regarding the serial or parallel nature of the search of the target?

A

> Strong linear relationship between reaction time and list length
-> serial search model

> Scanning and comparison of items in memory task takes 40 milliseconds for each task

29
Q

What is the difference between a serial search and a parallel search?

A

> Serial search: item by item

> Parallel search: whole set search

30
Q

What did the results of Sternberg’s ‘Memory scanning’ study (1966) regarding the self-terminating or exhaustive nature of the search of the target?

A

Search is exhaustive:

- it continues even when a match has been made

31
Q

What did Sternberg’s ‘Memory Scanning’ study (1966) show?

How does it differ from Kant and introspectionists?

A

For short lists of items held briefly in memory, when we access our memory to make decisions, we a use serial, exhaustive process

32
Q

How did Sternberg’s ‘Memory Scanning’ study (1966) go beyond early cognitivism and overcome behaviourist objections?

A

We can reliably gain access to and study our internal processes empirically

  • which Kant rejected
  • which introspectionnists tried to do but with severe constraints
  • which behaviourists said to avoid
33
Q

What did the experiment of Shepard and Metzler ‘Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects’ (1971) study and relie on?

A

> Processing of internal representation (mental image)

> Relied on reaction times to make simple decisions

  • while systematically manipulating an element of the task repeatedly over many trials
  • and across many research objects

-> mental chronometry (pioneered by Weber)

34
Q

What did Shepard and Metzler ‘Mental rotation’ of 3-D objects consist of (1971)?
What was there empirical question?

A

> Task: decide wether 2 objects are the same
- if rotation on physical plane is possible

> Matching based on internal process
- mental rotation

> Is there a relationship between time to make positive match and angle of rotation?

35
Q

What were the findings of Shepard and Metzler’s ‘Mental rotation’ of 3-D objects study?

A

> Support serial process

> Access and transformation of internal representations to allow judgement
- mental manipulation speed “mimics” real 3D manipulation speed

-> Mental image follows principles similar to that in the real world (Euclidean properties)

36
Q

Which debate did the study of Shepard and Metzler ‘Mental rotation’ of 3-D objects set off?
What does the current evidence support?

A

Debate within cognitive psychology:
- spatial coding
vs.
- propositional coding (e.g. above-below, left-right)

  • evidence supports existence of information coded spatially in the brain
  • > credibility to mental maps
37
Q

What did Craig and Tulving study in their experiment on ‘Depth of processing’ and verbal memory recall (1975)?

A

Does the depth of processing of verbal impact the ability to subsequently recall that information?

38
Q

What was the paradigm of Craig and Tulving’s experiment on ‘Depth of processing’ and verbal memory recall (1975)?

A

> Present list -> Memorise -> Recall
- level of recall reflects efficiency of learning

> Hypothesis: the deeper the processing, the better retrieval

> No instructions

> Participants had to answer 1 of 3 types of question

  • on the meaning (semantic content) - best retention level
  • on the sound (rhyme) - better retention level
  • on the physical feature (case) - low retention level

> Participants were shown 120 words

  • 60 old
  • 60 new
  • > Which did they recognise?
39
Q

What were the results of Craig and Tulving’s study on ‘Depth of processing’ and verbal memory recall (1975)?

A

The more we elaborate information the better it is recalled

40
Q

What are the possible disadvantages of deep-level processing?

A

> Negative memories repeatedly processed may become clearer and stronger

> Dwelling and rumination in people with anxiety and/or depression

> Memory of negative events in depression

> Memory bias

41
Q

What did Immanuel Kant, Jean Piaget, and Ulric Neisser have in common?

A

Studied schemas

42
Q

What is a cognitive schema?

A

An organised abstract representation of knowledge about a particular situation or thing

43
Q

What are the characteristics of cognitive schemas?

A

> Built up over time

  • direct experience
  • indirect knowledge (communication with others, medias)

> Culturally relative

> Triggers activate schemas

  • quick pattern match
  • stored template
44
Q

What happens when contradictory schemas are activated?

A

Ambiguity -> ‘Cognitive dissonance’

  • > adjustment of perception or interpretation
  • fix one alternative schema, or combine the two to form a new one
45
Q

What is the evidence that some schemas are innate?

A

> Some emerge early in development

> Schemas seem to cross animal species boundaries

> ‘Baby face’ schemas share facial features

  • physical form has evolved to benefit survival: mammalian and bird species are dependent on adult parents for survival and protection
  • > Baby face schemas have evolved to encourage parenting response
46
Q

What did the study of Sprengelmeyer et al. suggest regarding the baby faces (2009)?

A

Response to baby faces is influenced by level of female reproductive hormons
- on/off contraceptive pill; menopause

47
Q

What did the study of Glocker et al. using MRI show regarding baby faces (2008)?

A

Cuteness of baby face images associated to increased activity in nucleus accumbens (reward, motivated behaviour)

48
Q

What did the study of Borgi et al. (2014) show regarding the baby schema and the ‘ahh-cute’ response?

A

Children and adults both tended to find the young human faces compared to adult faces AND high baby schema faces cuter then low schema faces

-> baby / ‘cuteness’ schema is possessed from early age

49
Q

What creates cognitive dissonance with the baby schema?

A

Mixing adult and child-like features

50
Q

What was Ulric Neisser’s hypothesis on schema and perception (1967)?

A

Process of perception = cyclical process resulting in the final conscious perception
- automatic bottom-up processes influence conscious top-down feedback processes

-> constructive processes where schemas are assumed to play a crucial role in them

51
Q

What are the 4 components of Ulric Neisser’s model of cyclical constructive process (1967)?

A
  1. Feature analysis
    - automatic, unconscious, in parallel
    - do the features match the perceptual templates (schemas)
  2. Schema
    - preattentive: automatic, unconscious
  3. Active perceptual exploration search for expected features
    - to get more information
    - guided by info. from the activated alternative schemas, which creates ambiguity
  4. Sensory cues / features from stimulus environment
    - to resolve the ambiguity (cognitive dissonance)
    - consciously collecting more info.
    - to identify the object
52
Q

What is “one-shot learning”?

A

Schema, once formed, remains available to be activated at a later date

53
Q

What did Brewer and Treyens (1981), and Bower and Black (1979) show regarding schema and memory?

A

> Participants waited in room for 35 seconds set up as office

  • not knowing it was part of the experiment
  • 61 items

> Were tested for memory of items

> Results:

  • remembered obvious (expected) items
  • remembered unexpected (salient) items
  • falsely remember expected items that were not there

-> Memory is a constructive process, where you fill in the gaps

54
Q

What is an event schema?

A

> Relates to behaviour in specific situations

> Scripts
- stored and automatically accessed to guide our behaviours

55
Q

What happens if we do not possess an appropriate event schema for a situation?

A

We rely on the next best match or consciously work out what to do
- e.g. by observing others

56
Q

What is a role schema?

A

Set of attributes/functions that broadly define an individual to other people in specific situations
- dichotomised characteristics

  • can include specific negative attributes attached to particular roles
57
Q

What do role schemas including negative attributes provide?

A

A cognitive model that can explain prejudice, in terms of beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours

58
Q

What is a self-schema?

A

> Perceptions we have of ourselves

> How we act in different situations, consciously and unconsciously

59
Q

How do negative self-schemas impact us?

A

> Increase vulnerability to mental health problems

> Can maintain mental health problems when occurring

-> Identification and modification of negative maladaptive self-schemas is a common goal of psychological therapy