The Constitution Flashcards
(22 cards)
Key points of the UK constitution
- Uncodified
- Unentrenched and flexible
- Relatively easy for laws and principles to to be changed
- Unified based on parliamentary sovereignty
Key points of the Magna Carta (1215)
- Designed to deal with political crisis at the time
- Estbalished that everyone is equal before the law
- Established limits to the powers of the monarch
- Seen as the first constitutional check on executive power
- Seen as a prototype for for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Human Rights Act.
Bill of Rights (1689)
- Viewed as the start of the UK having a constitutional monarchy where Parliament is sovereign
- Began to transfer the royal prerogative powers to the prime minister
What are the five key sources of the UK constitution?
- Statute Law
- Common Law
- Convention
- Works of authority
- Treaties
Statue law
- Is laws passed by parliament: Acts of Parliament
- Takes precedence over other sources of the constitution
- Most statute law does not relate to the constitution
- Only requires a simple majority in parliament to become a law and therefore to form part of the constitution
The parliament acts (1911 & 1949)
- Established the primacy of the House of Commons and restrict the powers of the House of Lords
- Under the 1911 act money bills could be delayed for up to 1 month and other public bills for 2 years
- The 1949 Act reduced the amount of time the Lords could delay a bill to a year
what is common law?
- Made up of customs and judicial precedent
- A lot of constitutional principles are part of common law.
What are conventions?
- Customs and practices that are accepted as the way of doing things.
- Can be removed or made permanent by statute law.
arguments for the UK having a codified constitution
- Entrenching principles of the constitution protects them from government interference.
- It clearly sets out the limits of executive power and restricts its excesses
- Citizens rights are entrenched into the constitution
- Allows the constitution to be more consistent and rational
Arguments against the UK having a codified constitution
- Uncodified are more flexible and therefore more responsive to situations and change
- Gives too much political power to judges who are unelected and unrepresentative of British society
- Constitutions do not guarantee rights
Constitutional reform under new labour (Blair government 1997-2010)
- Measures to decentralise power- Scotland Act 1998 established the Scottish Parliament
- Measures to enhance or embed citizens rights- Human Rights Act 1998
- Measures to modernise the constitution and embed judicial independence
- Measure to make the constitution more democratic- House of Lords Reform Act 2014
Constitutional reforms (Coalition government under David Cameron 2010-2015)
- Wright Reforms of 2010 - designed to transfer some powers from the executive to backbench MPs
- Recall of MPs - constituents can force a by-election if they are unhappy with their representative
Arguments for keeping the Fixed Term Parliament Act
- Promotes stability and predictability
- Takes away an advantage previously held by the PM
- Still allows for some flexibility
- Transfers some power from the executive to the legislature
Arguments for repealing the Fixed Term Parliament Act
- Can create a ‘zombie parliament’ (towards the end of 2010-2015 parliament there was little to do)
- Hasn’t ben effective anyway (2017 and 2019 snap elections)
Constitutional reform since 2015
- More devolution to England (English Votes for English Laws)
- Most significant reform since 2015 is Brexit, leaving the European Union and repealing the European Communities Act of 1972
Arguments for devolution being a success
- UK has remained united
- Devolved assemblies are popular with the local populations
- Has helped support peace in Northern Ireland
Arguments against devolution being a success
- If one reason for devolution was to reduce calls for Scottish independence, it has failed
- Interest in devolution is low with low turnout for referendums and elections
Arguments for further devolution to England
- Fairness
- Move towards a federal structure
- Some demand from areas with strong regional identity ( Cornwall, Yorkshire, North-East)
Arguments against further devolution to England
- England is so much bigger than other areas, What would Westminster do?
- Little demand for an English Parliament
- Some parts of England have little in the way of regional identity and so would not ‘buy in’ to regional devolution
- The increasing number of City Mayors has begun to resolve the issue anyway
House of Lords Act 1999
- Removed all but 92 hereditary peers
- Lords became a mainly appointed chamber, with the removal of most hereditary peers
Arguments that the House of Lords Reform did enough
- Removal of hereditary peers made the House of Lords a more legitimate and professional body
- An unelected house means experts can be appointed
- People who can represent underrepresented groups in society can be appointed (e.g. Lord Bird, the big issue magazine)
Arguments that the House of Lords still needs reform
- There rae still 92 hereditary peers
- 26 bishops but no representative for other religions
- Party leaders still make political appointments to the House of Lords