The dynamics of abrupt climate change Flashcards

ESD

1
Q

Sub-Milankovitch Events (stadials and interstadials) -> climate oscillations which take place separate to orbitally forced Milankovitch cycles

A

they tend to be stronger across the NH in the North Atlantic Ocean as it has an antiphase relationship with the SO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dansgaard-Oescherger (D-O) Events -> periods of rapid warming 8-16 (Capron et al., 2010) followed by slower periods of cooling every 1.5ka (Dansgaard et al., 1989)

A

e.g. Allerød interstadial was proceeded by the Younger Dryas Stadial (12.5kyr) (Lowe and Walker, 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Henrich Events -> influx of meltwater into the North Atlantic Ocean from e.g. Laurentide Ice sheet -> weakens the THC causing cooling -> later followed by warming back to normal temperatures

A

led to the Younger Dryas in Henrich Event 0 (H0) (Andrews et al., 1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

evidence for Henrich events

A

iceberg rafting debris sediment in marine cores around the North Atlantic Ocean (Henrich, 1988)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bond Cycles -> sequence of D-O events until the warming causes a Henrich event by destabilising ice sheets (Bond et al., 1992; Bond and Lotti, 1995)

A

MIS 3 (60-28kyr) -> there were multiple D-O events (Capron et al., 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Periodicity not fixed for D-O events

A

MIS 5 = interglacial but possessed multiple stadials and interstadials which did not fit the 1.5ka e.g. D-O events 13 and 17 -> e.g. methane concentrations in NGRIP (Capron et al., 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rapid Climate Change Events -> occur between stadial and interstadial events

A

identified in the NGRIP ice core (Anderson et al., 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Younger Dryas 12.5kyr -> stadial triggered by Henrich 0

A

Laurentide Ice sheet led to meltwater influx into the North Atlantic (Anderson et al., 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

8.2ka -> 2-4 cooling over the NH and impacts of the SH

A

Laurentide ice sheet melted -> Lake Agassiz formed and overflowed into the Northeast Atlantic Ocean = outburst sediment from the lake as evidence -> THC changes (Wiersma et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012; Lewis et al., 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Little Ice Age -> cooling across the 16-19th century -> irregular intervals

A

thought to be a result of sunspot activity and volcanic activity (Miller et al., 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

causes -> sub-orbital forcing on a 1.5-2kyr cycle

A

no real evidence (Bond et al., 1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

causes -> binge-pure hypothesis (Capron et al., 2010)

A

Stable ice sheets increase friction by pinning the ice to bedrock but as geothermal heat is produce ice sheets become unstable leading to basal melting, lubrication and surging (Ruddiman, 2013), or ice sheet compression leads to ice sheets eroding to sea level causing the ocean to pull it off its bedrock pinning point -> surging increases as sea level increase = positive feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

causes -> tropical driver hypothesis (Rahmstorf, 2002)

A

changes to planetary waves across the tropics alter SSTs and oceanic circulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

causes -> wind field oscillator hypothesis (Schmidt and Hertzberg, 2011)

A

modelling of the start of a D-O event with deglaciation and warming simulates a shift in the subtropical Jetstream over the Rocky Mountains from a zonal to a meridional flow contributing to the sub-Milankovitch climate oscillations (Schmidt and Hertzberg, 2011).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

causes -> salt oscillator hypothesis/see-saw mechanism (Broecker, 1998; Bluiner and Brook, 2001; Clark et al., 2002; Gottschalk et al., 2015)

A

Brine rejection, evaporation and the supercooling of water under ice sheets leads to downwelling off the coast of Antarctica producing the Antarctic Bottom Water (ABW), and in the North Atlantic produces the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) (Clark et al., 2002; Gottschalk et al., 2015). The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (AMOC) forms as warm, fresh water replaces the salty, cold downwelling water in the North Atlantic and Southern Ocean (Clark et al., 2002). The influx of meltwater into the North Atlantic decreases the salinity of the water, causing the NADW to halt as downwelling ceases = cooling across Greenland and warming across Antarctica since the AMOC cannot activate without the NADW forming, meaning warm, equatorial water accumulates in the Southern Ocean -> increased evaporation across the SO eventually increases allowing the ADWC to restart and then the AMOC/NADW causing localised cooling across the SH and rapid warming over the NH resulting in D-O events (Bluiner and Brook, 2001; Broecker, 1998).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

evidence for see-saw mechanism (1)

A

(Ganapolski and Rahmstorf, 2001) -> modelled the asymmetrical response through inputting freshwater into the North Atlantic

17
Q

ice cores - multi proxies -> useful for validating sub-Milankovitch events

A

Antarctic Ice Cores = 800,000yrs, Greenland Ice Cores = 130,000, Vostok Ice Cores = 420,000

18
Q

evidence for see-saw mechanism (2)

A

GRIP and Vostok = methane concentrations -> Antarctica reacts faster to climatic changes with Greenland lagging behind by 1.5-3ka and 8th and 12th D-O event Antarctica warmed prior to Geeenland (Bluiner and Brook, 2001)

19
Q

evidence for see-saw mechanism (3)

A

GISP2 and Byrd -> methane concentrations = rapid warming and rapid cooling in Greenland but in Antarctica there was slow cooling and then rapid warming (Bluiner and Brook, 2001)

20
Q

evidence for the see-saw mechanism (4)

A

Antarctica would warm when Greenland would cool -> GRIP and Droning Maud Land ice cores = methane concentrations (EPICA members, 2006)

21
Q

evidence for the see-saw mechanism (5)

A

research used O-isotope ratios to reconstruct ocean temperatures -> MIS 3 -> AMOC was found to be the driver of the climatic change but could not determine what caused the addition of freshwater (EPICA members, 2006).

22
Q

Marine sediment cores -> lengths of 0-60Ma and are readily available -> multiproxy containing isotopes and other indicators

A

North Atlantic Ocean favourable for Milankovitch evidence as sedimentation rate is higher

23
Q

evidence for Heinrich events (1)

A

in the NA ice rafted sediment debris tended to increased periodically -> -> 1,400yrs, 2,800yrs, 4,200yrs, 5,900yrs, 8,100yrs, 10,300yrs and 11,100yrs -> VM 29-191 marine core was a key piece of evidence with ice-rafted debris records (Bond et al., 1997)

24
Q

evidence for Heinrich events (2)

A

sediment tended to be found 40-50N indicative that the Laurentide ice sheet played a role (Bond et al., 1997; Bond and Lotti, 1995)

25
Q

evidence for Heinrich events (3)

A

coupled atmosphere-ice interactions = identified that a drop in atmospheric temperatures causes the Greenland ice core to contain more soluble impurities -> occurred for the Little Ice Age, 8.2ka and Younger Dryas (Bond et al., 1997).

26
Q

evidence for Heinrich events (4)

A

AMOC behaviour by analysing carbonate production -> lower Circumpolar Current near the ABW is low in carbonate while the NADW is high in carbonate -> possible to analyse carbonate build up to then determine which currents dominate through which periods -> D-O events have strong carbonate concentrations = NADW re-establishing -> Heinrich events have carbon disillusion = NADW weakening (Gottschalk et al., 2015)

27
Q

evidence for Heinrich events (5)

A

Pollen records imply environmental shifts in line with Heinrich events and ice-rafting debris e.g. in Florida pine pollen was more copious during warmer, wetter conditions, while grass and oak pollen was more common during drier, colder conditions (Ruddiman, 2013)

28
Q

Lake cores -> vary in length between 100-10ka to 2Ma, tend to be temporal and are most informative when located in closed systems

A

sedimentation rates are variable but average around 1cm/10yrs, they contain O-isotopes and C-isotopes.

29
Q

Tree rings -> very small range, tend to be located where tree species last longer e.g. Sequoias

A

1 ring = 1 year producing a high temporal resolution, ring no/thickness informs precipitation rates while C14 produces dates for environmental shifts

30
Q

Hyrax middens -> 20ka, low latitude regions e.g. southern Africa, pollen, and geochemical elements in the excrement

A

local and regional environmental conditions informed

31
Q

future climate change

A

there are no yet certain conclusions regarding the future of the THC -> speculated that greenhouse gas concentrations will lead to a weakening as the ocean will be expected to hold more energy -> unsure how this will materialise (Clark et al., 2002).

32
Q

Teleconnections -> North Atlantic Ocean is leading to the weakening of the relationship between ENSO and the Indian Ocean Monsoon from the 1970s (Chang et al., 2001).

A

When ENSO impacts the Indian Ocean Monsoon -> impacts of Indian Ocean Dipole either amplify or oppose ENSO -> therefore important to analyse future changes (Chang et al., 2001).