The Existence of God Flashcards

(21 cards)

1
Q

What is the ontological argument for God’s existence?

A

It is an a priori argument that claims God’s definition implies His existence, similar to how the word “mister” implies a male.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Anselm define God in his ontological argument?

A

Anselm defines God as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the key idea in Anselm’s Proslogion Chapter 2?

A

If God is the greatest conceivable being, then He must exist in reality, as existing in reality is greater than existing only in the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the key idea in Anselm’s Proslogion Chapter 3?

A

God’s existence is necessary, meaning it is impossible for Him not to exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Gaunilo’s main objection to Anselm’s argument?

A

Gaunilo used the example of a perfect island, arguing that just because we can conceive of a perfect island does not mean it must exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did Anselm respond to Gaunilo’s objection?

A

He argued that God is necessary, whereas an island is contingent and dependent on other things for its existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Aquinas’ criticism of Anselm’s argument?

A

Aquinas argued that humans cannot fully understand God, so His existence cannot be self-evident to us.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did Hume criticize the ontological argument?

A

Hume argued that we can conceive of any being, including God, as not existing, meaning necessary existence is meaningless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was Kant’s objection to the ontological argument?

A

Kant argued that existence is not a predicate (a defining property) and that just because we define something as existing does not make it real.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Aquinas’ Fifth Way (teleological argument)?

A

He argued that nature has order and purpose, which must come from an intelligent designer—God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Paley’s watch analogy?

A

If you find a watch in nature, its complexity implies a designer. Similarly, the complexity of the universe implies a divine designer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Hume criticize the teleological argument?

A

He argues that:

Aptness of Analogy – Choosing a machine-like object (watch) presupposes design, unlike a cabbage, which also has order but no known designer.

Epicurean Thesis – Given infinite time, order could arise by chance.

Argument from Effect to Cause – We cannot assume a transcendent God from limited evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was John Stuart Mill’s criticism of the design argument?

A

The existence of evil and suffering suggests a flawed world, which implies a flawed designer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does Darwin’s theory of evolution challenge the design argument?

A

Evolution shows that life adapts through natural selection, not divine planning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the anthropic principle proposed by F.R. Tennant?

A

The universe is fine-tuned for human life, which suggests intentional design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Richard Swinburne’s argument for simplicity?

A

The simplest explanation for the universe’s order is that God designed it (following Ockham’s Razor).

17
Q

What are the three versions of Aquinas’ cosmological argument?

A

Prime Mover – Everything in motion is moved by something else; there must be a first mover (God).

First Cause – Everything has a cause; there must be a first uncaused cause (God).

Necessity and Contingency – If everything is contingent, there must have been a time when nothing existed. A necessary being (God) must exist to explain everything else.

18
Q

How did Hume criticize the cosmological argument?

A

He questioned the assumption of cause and effect and argued that we have no experience of divine causes.

19
Q

How did Bertrand Russell criticize the cosmological argument?

A

He argued that speaking of a necessary being is a contradiction because “being” implies contingency.

20
Q

What is the fallacy of composition in the cosmological argument?

A

Just because parts of the universe (e.g., humans) have causes doesn’t mean the universe as a whole needs a cause.

21
Q

What is Leibniz’s principle of sufficient reason?

A

Everything must have an explanation, and the universe’s ultimate explanation is God.