The relationship between theory and methods Flashcards
(46 cards)
what do positivists and interpretivists have differing conceptions of?
The nature of society
How do positivists see society?
As a reality external to individuals - social structures and social facts exist independent of the individual which exercise constraint over them and mould their behaviour.
How do interpretivists see society?
as a socially constructed set of meanings shared by a social group
What is there a conflicting view of and a basic agreement of between positivists and interpretivists?
About what counts as proposer sociological research evidence and different explanations and understandings of human behaviour.
how do positivists believe social behaviour can be measured and explained?
objectively - can and should be researched according to the same/ similar principles and methods used in natural sciences which includes the hypthetico-deductive model
What is positivists research more likely to involve?
large scale/ macro research on large numbers of people and is generally associated with structural theories of society e.g. marxism and functionalism
What are the quantitative statistical techniques which positivists tend to use?
- official statistics
- experiment
- comparative method
- social surveys
- structural questionnaires
- formal/ structured interviews
- non participant observation
How do potivists see quantitative methods?
As valuable providing quantitative empirical data which represented samples and survey techniques that can be generalised to the whole of society.
How do positivists view quantitative data?
As reliable - findings can be checked and replicated.
What do quantitative methods involve?
Objectivity and personal detachment of researchers from those they study and therefore positivists argue researchers avoid the risk of personal values and prejudice influencing research.
What do positivists see quantitative methods producing?
The kind of data which allows the creation of the cause-and-effect explanations of human behaviour and of predictions of what might happen in similar circumstances in the future.
What do interpretivists suggest methods adopted by positivists don’t produce?
A true account of society as they simply impose the researchers own framework of assumptions on those being studied.
Criticisms of positivists:
- Decide which questions are asked or not asked.
- Little opportunity for people to elaborate about what they think/ feel.
- Detachment of the researcher means they don’t develop empathy necessary to really understand the meaning and interpretations people hold.
- Statistics positivists produce though surveys are social constructions created by the categories and questions positivists themselves create.
- Official stats viewed by positivists as factual info are seen by interpretivists as social constructions - record of decision making by officials, over which stats are/ arent collected and how they categorise events e.g. suicide stats - interpretivists suggest nothing more than a record of a coroners decision making in classifying sudden, unexplained deaths.
What are Interpretivists more concerned with?
Understanding the meanings individuals give situations and how these perceptions direct social action.
What do Interpretivists think about using procedure of natural sciences?
That they are wholly innapropriate for the study of society because society is different from the natural world.
What do interpretivists argue about measuring peoples meanings and methods?
These cannot be measured or discovered by quantitative methods.
What do Interpretivists adopt?
An inductive approach to form theories rather than hypothetical-deductive methods used by positivists - more open-ended.
Where do theories emerge from?
The accumulation of insights, issues and evidence gained through research into meanings and interpretations people hold - roves the possibility of discovering ideas that those using the hypothetico -deductive method may not have even thought of.
What do Glaser and Strauss call grounded theory?
Theory arising from an inductive approach as it is grounded in an analysis of data that might have been collected.
What do interpretivists generally adopt?
Weber’s verstehen approach - developing closeness and empathy with people to understand the world through their eyes rather than the detachment preferred by positivists.
What do Interpretivists see the need to get?
Pero sally involved with people through deep conversations in unstructured interviews by close observation and participation in their activities to gain insight into their world, motives and meanings behind actions. E.g. Interpretivist research on crime is less likely to use the positives approach of looking for the causes of crime but is more likely to be studied as Becker studied it looking at how and why some behaviour becomes labelled criminal or deviant while other behaviours dont.
What type of research methods are interpretivists more likely to use?
Qualitative methods.
What type of research do Interpretivists use?
Small scale micro research associated with social action theories such as symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology.
What do Interpretivists methods include?
- Use of personal accounts and personal documents such as diaries and letters.
- Unstructured/ semi-structured open ended questionnaires.
- Informal interviews, focus groups and group interviews.
- Small scale case studied of group interaction.
- Participant and sometimes non-participants observation.