The role of education in society Flashcards
(7 cards)
Functoinalist perspective
(Parsons 1961)
Meritocracy
- education is the ‘Focal socialising agency - acts as a bridge between family and wider society
- in the family - children judged by pluralistic standards (rules only applying to them). Roles are ascribed and fixed
- in school + wider society - judged by universalistic values + impersonal standards. In society everyone has to obey the law. In schools each student sits the same exam
Functionalist perspective
(Durkheim 1903)
Durkheim believed in two main functions of education
Social solidarity
* Social solidarity - a sense of commnity, which stops individuals only persuing thier selfish desires
* education transmits societys culture from one generatoin to the next. Such as history lessons creating a sense of shared heritage
* ‘Society in minature’ - prepare children for life in wider society, such as teaching kids to cooperate with others like in the workplace
Specialist skills
* argues that edu atoin teaches individuals the specialist skills and knowledge they need to play thier part in the social division of labour
Functionalist perspective
(Davis and Moore)
Role allocation
* inequality is necessary to ensure the most important roles in society are filled by skilled people
* society must offer high rewards for these jobs so everyone competes for them and the most talented can be selected
- education acts as a proving ground for this. It ‘sifts and sorts’ according to ability, those able to gain high qualifications gain entry to the best schools
Marxist perspective
(Althusser, ideological state apparatus)
Education is an ideological state apparatus (ISA) - means for the bourgouis to controll the peoples ideas, values and beliefs
Education:
* reproduces class inequality by transmitting between generations
* legitimates class inequalities by producing ideologies that diguis its true cause.
* Persuades workers to accept inequality as inevitable and that they deserve this position in society
Marxist perspective
Marxist perspective
(Myth of meritocracy)
- Bowles and Gintis describe education as a ‘myth making machine’ - keep the proletariat from realising their repression and rebelling
- B+G argue meritocracy doesnt exist and achievment (or high income) isnt based on merit but on family and class
- ‘poor are dumb’ theory - blames pverty on the nidividual rather than capitalism (‘im poor becuase im not clever/hardworking).
Hidden curriculum
(Bowles and Gintis)
Hidden curriculum
* norms and values are taught indirectly and are part of school organisation
* such as:
- wearing a uniform (comitment to school over indivdual identity)
- respecting hierachy (used to being subordinate)
New right
(Chubb and Moe 1990)
State run education in the US has failed becuase:
* hasnt created equal oppertunity and fails the needs of disadvantaged groups
*