The Self Flashcards
Wilson et al (1982)
Asked participants to keep a diary logging their mood and factors that could influence it e.g health, sleep etc.
They were asked to judge how these factors impacted their mood and others were also asked the same without seeing the diary.
Other people had 45 correlation and the people themselves had 42.
Nisbett and Wilson (1977)
Had a stall with 4 sets of identical nylon socks and asked people to pick which they preferred
A – 11, B – 17, C – 31 and D – 41
Therefore there is a clear statistical trend yet the people were unaware of the effect of the position on their decision suggesting we may have no more insight into ourself than others.
Johansson et al (2005)
Asked participants to pick their favourite photo then later showed them a different photo and asked them why they chose it
87% failed to notice and continued to explain their choice process for the photo
Swiney and Sousa (2013)
Participants were given TMS helmets and were told they were attempting to transfer thoughts (fake)
People claimed they heard thoughts and even said “it was clear to me that the thoughts were not my own”
Markus (1977)
Found that participants with either labelled themselves strongly dependent or independent (schematic), and then those who were moderately between (aschematic) schematic participants judged schema relevant traits as true or not of themselves much quicker than aschematic suggesting this information is more accessible
Pfeifer et al (2009)
Discovered that regions of the brain involved in taking others perspective were active when particpants were asked to think about their self, and was increased in adolescents
Evidence for reflected self appraisals
DePaulo et al (1987)
Participants were paired with 3 separate people to complete 4 tasks each time.
Afterwards they had to rate each person on personality and liking, and then estimate how they thought each person rated them.
Although they could perceive liking went up throughout experience they could not pick out differences in likening
They thought they were rated the same by all but this was not the case
Morse and Gergen (1970)
Participants deceived to think they’re applying for a researching assistant job, filled in a self esteem questionnaire before and after clean/dirty confederate walked in
Scores showed change in self esteem dependent on whether they viewed the other applicant as better or worse than them
Thornton and Moore (1993)
Ps filled out questionnaires on their own physical attractiveness in a room with a ‘unrelated’ poster of 24 attractive/unattractive faces of same gender
Found that attractiveness ratings were significantly higher in unattractive condition and vice versa
Taylor and Label (1989)
Found that upward and downward social comparison can be beneficial as women with breast cancer chose to compare themselves to people worse off than them to remind them it could be worse but also compare themselves to women doing better to be inspired.
Maguire and Padawer-singer (1978)
Asked children to describe themselves and most focused on qualities that made them different to classmates
Cohen and Gunz (2002)
Asked Canadians and Asian participants to tell stories about 10 different situations, and found that Asians were much mor likely to describe the scene from an observers point of view whereas Canadians described the scene from their own viewpoint.
Crocker, Summers & Luhtanen (2002)
Students filled out self esteem questionnaires every time they received a college response and as expected their self esteem went up with acceptance and down with rejections; however the effect was much greater for those whose self esteem was contingent on academic success
What is the self?
The self is an organised set of stable beliefs we hold about ourselves that define our identity as individuals.
The major components of the self are the self-concept and self-esteem, which is the evaluative component of the self.
What is meant by ‘social me’?
Implyies that the self changes for different social contexts, based on the impression we want formed of ourself.