Theme 9: Population, Environment and Economy Flashcards
Explain the population-resources model
Postan’s (1966) model of population growth
- argued that a rising population would eventually hit a ‘resource ceiling’ - suggests this process was already underway
- argued that the core lands were becoming exhausted
Issues -
- assumed static agricultural technology;
- some further scope for growth via expansion of land for settlement and agriculture;
- but some colonization driven more by exhaustion of ‘core’ lands;
- and many colonized lands ‘marginal’ i.e. less fertile
Issues with Postan’s model
concentrates on the relationship between people and land, did not give much weight to other factors (agricultural innovation, for example, which could have made land more productive). also did not give much weight to the idea that there was significant commercialisation, which could have led to higher agricultural productivity and prompted specialisation and exchange
In this analysis, population growth was continuing in the 12th and 13thc, but were based on precarious foundations
Explain Langdon and Masschaele’s alternative model
- Argue against steady rate of demographic growth 900-1300;
- Instead, most rapid growth took place in early 13th century;
- Commercial development in 12th century provided employment opportunities and the confidence for family formation and thus fertility; (commercialisation critical in understanding why population growth happened)
- Implicitly rejects the notion of a medieval ceiling on population
- ^ an increasingly efficient agricultural economy fits well with view of commercialisation
How might warfare and conquest impacted the population?
areas exposed to warfare might suffer negative consequences - in parts of Yorkshire after the Norman conquest, we find evidence in doomsday book of lands which are wasted and depopulated (33% of Yorkshire recorded as ‘waste’)
its also possible that warfare and conquest had a positive impact on population - Danish invasion: around a third of place names in northern and eastern Yorkshire contain Scandinavian elements - might suggest significant Scandinavian settlement.
Norman conquest probably added fewer numbers of people to population levels due to its nature as an elite takeover rather than mass settlements. But, William Rufus engaged in a deliberate process of settlement in Cumbria, changing distribution pf local populations. e.g. in parts of south Wales in HI’s reign, communities of Flemings are brought in
How might the environment impacted population levels?
environmental conditions were not stable across this period. during early 14th c, climate became more volatile, summers became wetter and colder, along with a series of harvest failures. the central (11th, 12th, 13th) medieval centuries often described as the medieval climate anomaly (or medieval warm period). relatively few outbreaks of epidemic disease in this period. this period not free of environmental issues - chronicles list several instances of food shortages, disease (BUT frequency of these issues in these centuries lower than in the later middle ages)
Written sources of demographic change
- Poll taxes, especially that of 1377
- Manorial records, especially court rolls (some information about deaths and marriages)
- Wills
- Inquisitions post mortem (for lay tenants in chief) - inquiries conducted after the death of a landholder into their holdings - number of individuals who would have had an inquisition post mortem is small, but we can still draw inferences from these
- Records of mortality and morbidity for some Benedictine monastic populations (Canterbury, Westminster, Durham) - closed communities
- very little written evidence regarding children, and far greater evidence of mortality than births
Example of a local case study that reflects demographic change
Coltishall, Norfolk:
1349 - 168 male tenants
1359 - 74
^ sharp increase in mortality due to BD
Why does Postan’s model fail to explain 15thc demography?
abundance of land, shortage of labour driving up wages SHOULD have led the population to start to rise again, but this clearly does not happen (Population had not recovered to its 1377 level by the 1520s)
Why does the population level remain low? -
The population does not bounce back because further epidemic disease keeps population low
Narrative sources give us a sense that this may be the case - not just plague, but also a disease called the flux (1470s), the sweat (1480s)
1361-2 and 1369 outbreaks hit young men particularly hard - skewed demographic with not enough younger men in the population
Exogenous factors
Disease, climate, warfare
Endogenous factors
Agriculture/food production (seignurialism, technology, capitalist/enterprising behaviour, expansion of land under cultivation, use of marginal land, soil exhaustion)
^ all of these factors interrelated (e.g. the more soil is exhausted, the further you would have to expand into marginal land)
Commercialisation
Fertility
Urbanisation
Labour (e.g. movement of workforce from rural to urban areas)
Is the 14thc a Malthusian crisis?
Issue with Postan’s population-resources model - assumes human passivity, won’t respond to a challenge (does not allow for human innovation and technological development)
Is the 14thc a Malthusian crisis? -
Famine = crisis of distribution? (rather than there simply just being no food)
^ people dying in the 14thc not because there was no food but because they couldn’t afford it (huge spike in food prices in 1314/15)
Stats to show the devastation brought about by the Black Death
Black Death: killed over 1/3 of England’s population - England’s population does not seem to have recovered for over 150 years after this disaster (few signs of sustained growth until the sixteenth century)
1348-51 Black Death, combined with poor weather and failing harvests, reduced the population by around 46% in 3 years
^ further instances of epidemic diseases in 1361-2, 1369 and 1375 - by 1377, the population had almost halved
1370s - 2.8 million people in England
1520s - 2.3 million
Historians generally agree that continuous instances of epidemic disease contributed to the low levels of population growth - studies of north-western Europe corroborate this theory
What does Hatcher argue about the pace of population recovery?
Hatcher argues that the slow pace of population recovery was determined by high mortality levels
^ evidence of this = obituary book of Canterbury Cathedral Priory - reveals several events of ‘crisis mortality’ among its residents in the 15thc
^ study of the monks of Westminster Abbey in the late 15thc - significant drop in life expectancy (again, due to ‘crisis mortality’)
Issues with Hatcher’s case studies
- monastic communities not representative of the rest of the population - could argue that they were both over or under representative
- they lived comfortable lives with enough food - death rates may be lower than the general populace?
- but, they also lived in close proximity to one another in densely populated urban areas - more likely to contract communicable diseases?
There is a lack of evidence about other social groups - sources like wills and court rolls are not ‘of sufficient statistical quality’ (Bailey’s quote)
What do historians generally accept about the economic conditions of the 15thc?
Historians generally accept that in the fifteenth century, real wages were high and rents relatively low
The availability of cheap land and well-paid employment implies that early marriage would have been commonplace (thus, the fertility rate would have been high)
Do living standards directly correlate to birth rates?
In order to establish the idea that fertility was quite low in fifteenth century England, we must dismiss the idea that rising living standards directly correlated to rising birth rates - e.g. the trauma of the Black Death may have encouraged survivors to protect their new wealth (a gradual increase in living standards may have the effect of raising birth rates over time, but sudden changes may have the opposite effect)
Nature of female employment after the BD
Shortage of workers after the BD led women to be increasingly included in England’s labour market - would have discouraged them from marrying early (or at all)
In the aftermath of the BD, there was a fall in prices relative to wages - increased the purchasing power of peasants (also created demand for a wider range of goods, including non-essential items like woollen textiles or finished leather goods) - the increase in demand could only be satiated by drawing on female employment
^ Smith - ‘labour shortages in England gave rise to a substantial expansion of unmarried women working’
Goldberg’s research into late medieval York - argues that after the mid-fourteenth century, more women began to work outside their households, creating a tendency to marry late, or not at all
Issues with Goldberg’s model
Goldberg’s model is not backed up by statistical evidence, but draws upon indirect evidence (e.g. wills)
Issue with using York as a case study - it was an economic centre, benefitting from growing foreign demand for woollen textiles
To accept Goldberg’s hypothesis, we would need to establish that female servanthood grew significantly- lack of evidence of the extent of servanthood before the BD from which we could draw comparisons, no substantial evidence that women stayed in servanthood until their mid-twenties (delaying marriage) - Poos concedes that this can’t be proven
What does Goldberg’s model rely on?
This model also rests on two premises - that ‘economic growth’ after the BD led to more women joining the workforce and that servanthood was preferable to wage labour
Issues with these premises -
- the period after the BD was not one of stable economic growth (e.g. decline in aggregate demand)
- not necessarily an increase in purchasing power - this may have been the case for wage-earners, but peasants would have been negatively impacted by a fall in food prices
- incomes did not increase indefinitely - there would have been a ceiling of demand for many goods (many ‘growth industries’ seem to have peaked then declined by the early fifteenth century)
- external economic problems - depression in overseas markets, shortage of credit etc…
- annual contracts of servanthood would not have been preferable to workers - they would have had strict terms of employment and a lower rate of pay than daily work - Bailey argues that women would likely rather have taken up wage labour to supplement their family income rather than committing themselves to servanthood
Brenner’s view on population trends
Marxist school of thought (Brenner) - the failure of agricultural production to sustain the growing population was due to the ‘feudal’ system of landholding, which was inherently exploitative and failed to encourage agricultural innovation
^ this view has been challenged by recent scholarship - argued that lords were not as exploitative as has often been suggested, but rather it was the warfare caused by militaristic kings and nobles that caused the most damage in the fourteenth century
^ war provoked recession, raised taxation and disrupted capital markets
What does Campbell refer to climate patterns as?
‘Major exogenous shocks’
What does Campbell identify as the 5 dilemmas of agrarian economies?
- ‘tenurial dilemma’ of how to most effectively divide land (rate of tenurial reform far slower than the speed at which economic circumstances might change - rooted in local custom)
- ^ issues - some tenants owed heavy labour service to their lords, others owed fixed money rents that failed to reflect the value of the land (1300 - inquisitiones post mortem revealed that most tenants held land in free tenure)
- ‘ecological dilemma’ of how to maximise agrarian output without damaging the soil (essential to maintain the nutrient balance in the soil) - crop rotation was one solution to this
- ^ tragedy of the commons - individuals used the land as they pleased without regard for the common good, leading to the hypothesis that arable soils tended to become exhausted (lack of conclusive evidence here) - plenty of evidence of harvest failure, but this could have been down to a number of factors, including poor soil quality, bad weather, plant diseases, lack of labour etc….
- ‘Ricardian dilemma’ of how to raise output without leading to diminishing returns to land (arising from farming on inferior land as a result of population growth) and labour (by driving down the average productivity of labour)
- ‘Malthusian dilemma’ of how to prevent the growth of population from exceeding the rate of agricultural output (pre-industrial populations could grow at a rate of 1.5%, but agrarian output was unlikely to grow at a higher rate than 0.5%)
‘entitlements dilemma’ of who should have a share of the spoils of production
Solutions to the Malthusian dilemma
- ^ potential solution - emigration (12th and 13th centuries saw plenty of movement to Wales, Ireland and the royal burghs of Scotland)
- ^^ had the subsequent effect of lowering female marriage rates, as emigrants were largely male, leaving many areas with a lack of male partners (slowed population growth)
What has dendrochronology identified?
Dendrochronology (tree-ring dating) has identified two major environmental shocks in the middle ages: 1163-1189 and 1315-1353