theories Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

Marxist and functionalist similarities

A

both say w/c cant afford stuff
- func - choice - if they work hard enough its based on merit - harder for w/c though
- Marxist - oppressed through structures don’t have a choice only wither to regret capitalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

marx + func similarities

A

both say media contributes to spreading values
func - consensus values
marxist - dominant ideology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

marxist and functionalist differences

A

marxist - cant afford stuff - ideological dominance influencing you into wanting it cant succeed - economical pressures
func- strain theory - choice to work - value consensus goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

marxist and func differ

A

marixst spread ideological bourgeois values
func - consensus values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

positivist like what experimental techniques

A

> pre coded questionnaires - macro
secondary data - official statistics, documents
structured interviews _ quantitative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

interpretivist (interactionalist) like what experimental techniques

A

> unstructured interviews
open ended questionnaires
primary data - covert observation, ethnographies
longitudinal studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

structuralist theories like

A

overt non participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

anti structuralist like

A

covert non- participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

primary data adv

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

primary data disadv

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

secondary data adv

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

secondary data disadv

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Durkheim- natural experiment

A

statistics of suicides in Europe - suicide rates vary systematically with other social event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rosenthal and Jacobson - field experiment

A

Californian primary school specific pupils where told to teachers would ‘spurt’ and high IQ’s and did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elton may- field/lab

A

Hawthorne effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Harvey and slatin - lab experiment

A

teachers expectations of students - whether teachers held fixed ideas about pupils of different social classes
m/cstudents were favoured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

labelling theories

A

Harvey and slatin interview
Charkins et al
durkheim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

official statics

A

> exam results - w/c underachievement

> crime - knife crime in w/c areas

> census - how many people living in one house - w/c underachievement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

demack, sean, drew

A

GCSE exam results analysis 65,000 - large sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

documents public

A

Ofsted report - school policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

unstructured interview adv

A

> builds rapport comfortable - able to expand on topic giving more qualitative date

> able to ask follow up questions - valid - interpretivists - interactionist would like this

22
Q

unstructured interview disadv

A

> hard to quantify and find trends - risk to being subjective

> not reliable - cant be repeated - making it only relevant to that group - not representative can’t be generalise

23
Q

Sharpe - unstructured interviews

A

girls attitudes to education/ work to find whether they had high aspirations

24
Q

hart and Risley - structured interview

A

childern from different social classes find out how many words they knew by three

25
willis lads - unstructured interview
w/c 'LADS' anti-school subculture talk freely in their own words about their views on school teachers and work
26
sullivan- structured interview
tv shows different groups of students watch correlation to achievement in school
27
jolly Amish study - unstructured interview
power relationships between men and how sex and sexuality is seen in the community - undercover midwife
28
Oakley - unstructured interview
experiment of becoming a mother with newly mothers
29
Bowles and Gintis - questionnaires
measured students personality traits comparing students school grades found concentration between traits and middle class
30
Ireson and Hallam- questionnaire
impact of sets in schools they asked over 6,000 students and their experience of being in the set and lower sets are less postive about school
31
lacey - questionnaire
follow up questions to question the anti and pro school subcultures
32
wilkinson
genderquake how peoples views and expectation of girls have changed over the years
33
pre-coded questionnaires adv
> quantitative date - finds trends - macro - marxist like > reliable - repeatable - generalisable
34
pre coded questionnaires disadv
> no verstehen - not good when studying subcultures - willis lads > not qualitative date - doesn't give an in-depth- unable to expand on their answer could lead to misinterpretation
35
covert participant observation adv
> gains vestehen in depth - qualitative data - interactionist + > no hawthorne effect unaware they're being observed - natural behaviour - valid data
36
covert observation disadv
> unethical - did'nt give consent to being observed > not representative can only be generalised to small samples as can't exactly replicated - not macro - postivists
37
wright 2*
non participant + overt race relation in primary school, conflict with teachers and pupils based on race -inner city
38
patrick - g 2*
covert participant knew a member - Glasgow gangs- studied how the gangs deviant behaviour became law breaking - power structures
39
griffin black like me
cover participant observation dakened the colour of his skin to look black to experience racism in American 1960s (looking for jobs)
40
punch
covert non participant Amsterdam police tried to be accepted, ver identified e.g searching houses and people (went native)
41
overt non-participant adv
42
overt non-participant disadv
43
gerwitz
44
ethnographies adv
> high validity > verstehen as builds rapport
45
ethnographies disadv
> unable to identify patterns - macro positivists not like > not reliable cant be repeated only be applied to that situation
46
longitudinal studies adv
> insight into unique situation that may not be able to be studied in other ways > gives valid data quantitative able to find trends micro scale - interactionalist
47
longitudinal studies disadv
> micro not macro - positivist dont like > participant tend to drop out over time - less representative harder to generalise
48
malinowski - incest study
incest happened but was not a problem until action of incest was labelled and publicised by island elders consquences the youth committed suicide due to the labels
49
50