Theories Of Offending Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

Psychobiological theories

A

Lombroso

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lombroso

A

He examined the individual rather than working on the crime alone

  • criminals are born and not made
  • role of environment was minimal in shaping behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criticism

A
  • lacks explanatory power, needs further consideration or social and environmental factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What sets the potential for future behaviour?

A

Normal genetic variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Family studies

A

Criminal behaviour runs in families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rowe and osgood (1984)

A

Looked at the importance of genetic, environment and individual factors on self reported delinquency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Development of antisocial behaviour

A

Risk factors in childhood can predict antisocial behaviour in adults
- biological, behavioural and social indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Longitudinal studies

A
  • data collected at different ages/points
  • same individuals involved
  • data collected from different sources
  • use follow up period
  • minimum 5 year follow up
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Farmington and West (1990) - The Cambridge Study

A
  • longitudinal study of 411 London males aged 8-48
  • 20% had acquired convictions by age 17
  • 33% by age 25
  • 77% of those convicted as juveniles reconvicted between 17-24 and 45% at 25-34
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Common characteristics: childhood

A
  • troublesome
  • dishonest
  • came from poor larger families
  • more likely to have criminal parents
  • experienced family conflict
  • experiences harsh/ erratic discipline off parents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Age 10

A

Identified as hyperactive
Impulsive
Unpopular rated low intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

age 14

A

Aggressive

Had delinquent friends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Age 18

A

Drank more
Smoked more
Gambled
Associated with gangs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Age 32

A

Poorer housing
Marital break up
Psychiatric disorder
Problem with own children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Key protective factors

A
  1. high iQ
  2. low impulsiveness
  3. good parenting
  4. greater school enjoyment
  5. pro-social peer group
  6. balanced parental discipline
  7. good employment
  8. good marriage
  9. parental interest in education
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Risk factors for conduct disorder and delinquency - Murray and Farmington (2010)

A
  • low intelligence
  • poor parental supervision
  • large family
  • criminality in family
  • child physical abuse
  • antisocial peers/parents
  • erratic parenting
  • substance use
  • low school attendance
  • parental conflict
  • low family income
  • high crime neighbourhood
  • high delinquency rate schools
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why is knowing risk and protective family’s relevant?

A
  • leads to early identification at risk of young people
  • gives direction on what can work
  • suggests ways we can work to strengthen and protect young people
  • helps us in the development of theories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Personality theories

A

Eysenck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Eysenck

A

Child socialisation occurs through the process of conditioning
- the association of anti-social behaviour with unpleasant punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does an individuals conditionability depend on?

A

An individuals personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Child develops a conscience..

A

In a way that prevents them from behaving in an anti social way

22
Q

How does personality affect behaviour?

A

Through it’s effect on development of a conscience to control behaviour

23
Q

Roberts and del Vecchio (2000)

A

Behaviour is consistent over time

24
Q

How did Eysenck view offending?

A

As natural - humans sought pleasure and avoided pain

  • not everyone offended as due to their conscience, which was viewed as a conditioned fear response
  • conscience built up in childhood as caregivers would disapprove
25
What does this theory consider?
Those who commit offences have not built up strong consciences, because of poor conditionability
26
Extraversion
- people with high E are cortically under aroused
27
Who conditions more
Extraverts condition less effectively than introverts
28
Neuroticism
- unstable ANS so strong reactions to unpleasant environmental stimuli
29
Conditioning?
High N individuals condition less effectively then those with low N
30
Psychoticism
``` Preference for solitude Sensation seeking Callousness Aggression Lack of empathy ```
31
Likely offenders?
- high E/N - will be less likely to control anti social behaviour - predicted they are over representated In offender populations
32
Strengths?
- attempts to integrate biological, psychological and environmental factors
33
Criticisms?
Theory is unlikely to apply to all offenders, lacks explanatory power - lack of empirical evidence for conditonability and socialisation
34
Learning theories
Criminal behaviour is learnt
35
SLT
- learned behaviour or failure of socialisation process
36
Differential association theory
- emphasis on the type of peer group/environment in which crime frequently occurs - learning is through association of others - main part of learning takes place within close personal groups - people learn: crime techniques, motives, attitudes
37
Strength?
Has provided foundation for successive theories
38
Weakness?
- only accounts for the acquisition of criminal tendencies and not their maintenance or performance
39
Bandura - modelling
Learning can occur through observing others
40
Models for behaviour?
Friends Family Subculture
41
Patterson (1982)/ Patterson et al. (1992)
- focused on ideas of coercion, based on systematic observations of interactions between parents and children
42
Parents of anti social children?
- failed to set expectations of behaviour - failed to monitor their behaviour to ensure it was desirable - failed to enforce rules promptly and consistently - used more punishment
43
Coercive families
- if a parent behaves coercive towards a child and the child reacts by yelling and the parent stops being coercive then the child learns that to use hostile reactions to terminate hostile situations - coercive families create coercive children
44
Attachment theory
Infants develop a set of expectations about future interactions, based on prior experiences of interactions with a particular figure
45
AT and offending?
Disruption of attachment bonds between mother and child is significant in later deviance - they have problems forming relationships with partners, children and peers - likely to be susceptible to influences outside the family
46
Absense of sharing and communication?
Parents fail to transmit normative values and problem solving skills to their own children
47
A defence against painful feelings of dependency and powerlessness...
Is hostility and a lack of anxiety
48
Cognitive revolution - Ross and Fabiano (1985)
Ds
49
Life course persistence
Bb
50
Moral reasoning theory
How an individual justifies their behaviour in respect of moral issues - offenders are believed to possess specific types of values which are supportive of criminal conduct - offending is associated with a delay in the development of moral reasoning
51
Kohlbergs theory (1981)
- offenders typically show immature reasoning reflective of stages 1 and 2