Theory and Methods Flashcards

1
Q

What is ‘Structuralism’?

A

An approach which is concerned with the overall structure of society and how social institutions constrain and control individual behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Summarize the functionalism (Theory and Methods)

A

Functionalism is a structuralist approach which regards society a harmonious social system, that social order and cohesion maintains fundamental value consensus.
- Organic analogy
- GAIL model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the GAIL model

A

Parson argues a healthy state must resolve instrumental problems and expressive problems by satisfying four functional prerequisites:

(Instrumental problems)
Goal attainment
- Society needs to set goals and allocate resources to achieve them. This is the function of the political sub system like parliament

Adaptation
- The social system meets its members’ material needs through the economic sub-system, like shops, factories ,etc

Integration
- Parts of the system need to be integrated together to have shared goals, with people having a sense of belonging in society. This is the role of the sub-system of religion, education and media.

Latency
- Minimising social tensions which might prevent individuals and society from properly working together efficiently. this done through the sub system of kinship and family

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Merton add on to functionalism.

A

Criticized Parsons for assuming all social institutions performed beneficial functions for society, rather some parts of society are dysfunctional.
- Merton suggested there were manifest functions of and institution, with intended consequences
- and Latent functions with unintended consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name 4 weaknesses of the functionalist approach

A
  • Action theorists see functionalism as too deterministic and believe individuals are not just passive products of the system
  • Postmodernists claim metanarratives can no longer explain everything form a single perspective
  • Overemphasizes the beneficial parts of society and ignores the bad parts of society such as the dark side of the family
  • Value consensus itself does not provide stability, it depends on the values inside the system
  • Ignores the inequality in society which Marxists talk about
  • Has a malestream view and doesn’t consider the unequal distribution of power women do not receive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the ‘new right’?

A

An approach closely associated with functionalism, it believes in individual freedom, reduction of state spending, promotion of the free market and competition, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is ‘Surplus value’?

A

Employees produce more than what is needed for employees to pay them their wages, this extra produced by workers is referred to as surplus value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is ‘False Class Conscience’?

A

The lack of awareness among people of what their true interests are, and that the current system benefits all, and it is fair and just

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name 3 weaknesses of Marxism

A
  • Overemphasizes the conflict within society, and functionalists would argue society is stable
  • overemphasizes social class as the main source of inequality but ignores race, religion, etc
  • There are way more classes than the two they present
  • Sees individuals as passive products of the social system,. which socialises everyone to conform
  • Postmodernist argues that it is inadiquate to use a metanarritive to explain all of society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is ‘Interpretivism’?

A

People have consciences, with beliefs and values, and these influence the way people act; people are not constrained or controlled by outside forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is ‘Interactionalism’?

A

Concerned with understanding human behaviour in face to face situations and how individuals come to be defined by how they interact with other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is ‘Symbolic Interactionalism’?

who brought it

A

Mead sees society as built up by interactions between people which take place on the basis of meanings held by individuals
- People act in terms of symbols, and they act towards people in accordance to these meanings
- These meanings develop out of interaction with others
- Individuals can only develop a conception of themselves by understanding how others see them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the ‘Looking-glass self’?
and who brought it

A

Cooley suggested you see yourself through the eyes of others, imagining their judgements, opinions and reactions to yourself.
- Based on these imagined perceptions, you start to form an idea of who you are, if people think you’re funny, you’ll see yourself as funny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the ‘Labelling Theory’?

A

Labels given to individuals by others can influence their behaviour and self-identity, leading to a self fulfilling prophecy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is ‘Ethnomethodology’?

A

Believes social order is an illusion, rather individuals actively construct and maintain the appearance of social order in society through their everyday interactions.
- It explores how people collectively create and enforce the rules that govern their behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name 2 weaknesses of social action theory

A
  • Ignores structures in society like power, social classes, gender inequalities
  • Does not explain the motives behind peoples actions
  • Ignores the fact that not everyone has the equal chance to get their labels to stick
  • Postmodernists would say its just another meta narrative that tries to explain social life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is ‘Verstehen’? and who brought it

A

Brought by Weber, it focuses on the idea of understanding human behaviour by putting yourself in the position of those being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is ‘Structuration’?

A

People are constrained and shaped by social institutions, but at the same time, they can take action to change them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Name 2 general features of all feminist approaches

A
  • Inequalities in power and status between men and women
  • Recognise the importance of patriarchy
  • Gender roles are socially constructed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Name the main weakness of liberal feminists

A

Focus on fixing the effect of patriarchy and inequality (through laws) ,rather than focusing on the root cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Name the 2 weaknesses of radical feminists

A
  • Fails to understand not all women share the same inequality
  • Fails to recognise the gradual improvement that is being made with laws and such
  • Sees men as the enemy, but not all men are engaged in the domination of women
  • Marxist feminists would argue it is capitalism that is at the root of women subordination, not men
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Name 1 weakness of Marxist feminists

A
  • Don’t recognise that patriarchy ahs existed in all societies, not just capitalist
  • It is men who benefit from women subordination, not just capitalism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is ‘modernity’?
and name 3 features

A

An approach that began roughly in the 1700s:
- Societies are based on independent nation states
- Social class is the main form of social division and social identity
- Life is fairly predictable
- Industrialisation and the manufacturer of standardized goods for a mass market
- One way mass media is a reflection of social reality

24
Q

What is ‘Postmodernism’?
and name 3 features

A

An approach which stresses society is rapidly changing so much that society is fragmented into many different groups, interests, lifestyles and essentially society cannot be defined
- Much wider consumer choice
- media consumption and lifestyle is the main source of identity
- Culture is diverse and people pick ‘n’ mix cultures
- Globalisation has meant united nations like EU
- Objective truth in undiscoverable

25
Q

Explain the myth of truth, and who brought it?

A

Lyotard claimed people no longer believe in the myth of truth, as society is changing constantly therefore societies can no longer be understood through eh application of general theories

26
Q

Explain pick ‘n’ mix identities

who brought it

A

Baudrillard claimed individual identity is not formed by social class, rather choice of lifestyle, and people draw their lifestyles from a broad range of cultures around the world

27
Q

What is ‘late/high modernity’? and waht are the two key features

A

Giddens are just in a stage where key features of modernity have been intensified.

Disembedding
- Where social relations and practices become increasingly detached from local contexts, through technological advancements, social interaction isn’t needed within close proximity.

Reflexivity
- Due to our rapidly changing society, we are forced to become reflective and continually re-evaluating our ideas; traditions and customs no longer guide us how to act

28
Q

Name 2 criticisms of postmodernism

A
  • Because it is all based on criticism, it sees all no knowledge as not better than the other, it lacks vision on how to improve society, ignoring social problems.
  • Overemphasizes the influence of media and assumes people are passive, and easily manipulated
  • Assumes everyone can pick ‘n’ mix, ignoring inequalities
  • Postmodernism is a metanarrative itself, therefore they’re saying they have no more value than anyone else
29
Q

Summarize the positivist and interprevist views on whether sociology is a science

A
  • Positivists believe the methods and procedures used in natural sciences can be applied to the study of society
  • Interprevists argue sociology cannot be a science, in the same way as natural sciences. Emphasizing the difference to studying society and studying the natural world.
30
Q

What does Comte say regarding whether sociology is a science

A

He argue that science is there to explain how things relate to each other, and by using traditional empirical methods, It is possible to discover the laws that control and shape the behaviour of people in society;
- by laws of coexistence and succession

31
Q

What does Durkheim say regarding whether sociology is a science

A

Although sociology rarely produces precise/repeatable results such as natural science (due to sociology having many variables), you can apply the procedures of the natural sciences to sociology enabling value free research

32
Q

What are social facts?

A

Phenomena that exist outside your control, but mould you

33
Q

Name 3 features of positivism

A
  • Human behaviour is in response to social facts, explain by cause and effect relationships
  • Use of quantitative data should be used to study society
  • Research should focus on the search for social causes of events in society
  • (Macro not micro) The focus on sociology should be on the study of social institutions, not on individuals
34
Q

Name 3 problems for the positivist approach as to whether sociology is a science

A
  • You can’t replicate the same variables every time, the same way natural science can
  • Ethical issues, you are studying humans, not objects or chemicals
  • Sociology study should be in a normal state, not in lab conditions
  • Hawthorne effect; science doesn’t have to consider this
  • So many validity considerations to take in to account that you don’t have to with objects and chemicals

-

35
Q

What does Popper say regarding whether sociology is a science

A

He claims sociology cannot be a science.
- He uses his falsification theory and explain in science you can falsify a hypotheses as the variables can remain the same in each experiment.

  • In sociology you cannot falsify anything. In the study of society, things are complex and influenced by unique context factors, so experiments cannot have the same variables every time.
36
Q

What does Weber say regarding whether sociology is a science

A

He claims sociology is not a science
- From the ideas of Verstehen, sociology requires a subjective understanding which means sociologists require to empathetically put oneself in the shoes of others and try to grasp the reasons behind their actions
- Science is strongly objective, as variables can remain the same, this can’t be said for the study of society.

37
Q

Summarize the realist views on whether sociology is a science

A

They claim positivists and interprevists both misunderstand what natural science is actually like; science deals with both observable data and unobservable data.
- Positivists focus on observable data and interprevists focus on unobservable data
- So both are doing science, therefore sociology is a science

38
Q

What does Bhaskar say regarding whether sociology is a science?

A

Sociology is a science
- Sociology operates in the same way as science that science sometimes can’t observe data, but can understand the effects of it, like we always knew the earth was round but only observed the earth in the 60s
- Sociology can’t see social classes, but can understand the effects of having lower income on your housing condition.

39
Q

What does Sayer say regarding whether sociology is a science?

A

Sociology is a science
- Science isn’t always predictable,
- Science is sometimes done in closed systems, which are predictable
- and in open systems which are unpredictable like weather, or earthquakes
- just because you can’t predict human behaviour doesn’t mean sociology isn’t a science, as natural sciences sometimes can’t predict experiments.

40
Q

What does Kuhn say regarding whether sociology is a science

A

Sociology is both a science and not a science
- whether sociology is seen as a science or not depends on the stability paradigm in the field
- Within a paradigm, sociology meets the criteria of a science by using systematic observation and testing of ideas
- However, sociology is not a mature, mainstream science, because it hasn’t found a unifying paradigm. Sociologists do not share a set of assumptions about the world or about how to do research.

41
Q

Name 3 social influences on the nature and direction of scientific research

A
  • Time and money available for research
  • Desire for promotion and success
  • How useful the research is seen to funders
  • Current state of knowledge
  • Pressures to meet deadlines
  • Whoever is funding the research
  • Desire for the experiment to succeed
  • Values of researcher
42
Q

Name 3 postmodernist views on why finding out whether sociology is a science is irrelevant

A
  • No sociological research defines social life
  • Science is just another metanarrative
  • Claims of value freedom by scientists is not true
  • Pointless to define the social causes for behaviour as society is so broad
  • No point in copying natural sciences, as it has created nuclear weapons and pollution
43
Q

Name 2 disadvantages of the Positivist approach, in terms of what Interprevists would claim

A
  • Methods do not provide valid, in depth information
  • Imposition problem
  • Social statistics created are social constructions, (record of what people want to collect and do not want to collect)
44
Q

Name 2 disadvantages of the Interprevist approach, in terms of what Positivists would claim

A
  • Lack of reliability due research depending on the interpretation of the researcher
  • The closeness of research makes research invalid (Hawthorne effect)
  • Difficult to repeat research, thus generalisations are harder to make
45
Q

Name 2 disadvantages of the Interprevist approach, in terms of what Feminists would claim

A
  • Research on men is generalised to women
  • Male bias research that focuses on the male view of life and ignores the experiences of women
  • Malestream methods; for e.g. a lot of positivist methods are conducted with detachment from the interviewer and interviewee, thus the way researchers control interviews, is the way how men try and control situations.
46
Q

Why can value freedom be argued to be impossible, and give an explanation.

A

Personal prejudices will influence the selection of subjects studied.
- A feminist will look for research o how males dominate society
- Marxists will look for class inequalities
- Functionalists will look for challenges to the view society is harmonious

47
Q

Briefly explain why sociologists should not be value free, and neutral

A
  • Gouldner claims that pretending to be value free and not taking sides supports the powerful in an unequal society.
48
Q

What does Becker talk about in terms of value freedom?

A
  • We shouldn’t be value free
  • Research should not be neutral, rather should be driven by the desire to improve the world
49
Q

What do Postmodernists say regarding value freedom

A
  • There is no objective truth and all forms of knowledge are social constructions, and are all valid.
50
Q

Name 2 ways we can accept the existence of values in sociology, and still produce valid/reliable data

A
  • Values can’t be avoided when choosing a topic to research, but values and prejudices should never manipulate the data collection
  • Values should be considered when examining ethics of research
  • Data should always be open to criticism and debate
51
Q

Briefly explain why sociologists should be value free.

A
  • Sociologists like Durkheim and Comte claim sociology should be value free to get the status similar to the natural sciences of being objective and factual.
52
Q

Name 3 things that influence the formation of social policies

A
  • Desire for governments to remain popular and get re elected.
  • Influence of the EU, and how it may restrict countries
  • Financial constraints
  • Fits their ideologies
  • Views of professionals such as social workers
53
Q

detailly explain 3 reasons why sociology should be involved in applied social policy research.

A
  • Founders of sociology like Marx, Durkheim and Comte all saw the study of society as means of improving society, and not explaining social problems to help make policy recommendations is simply refusing to take responsibility for the findings of the work
  • Liberal feminists claim many existing policies support patriarchy, and therefore with research can help to change them.
  • Practically, it is dumb not to take it on. Those who choose to not get involved will run out of money for any research. There are so many independent bodies who are funded by the government.
  • Marsland claims the reason social policy doesn’t take proper account of sociological research is due to sociologists not committing themselves to policy research and would rather sit on the side-lines
54
Q

detailly explain 3 reasons why sociology should not be involved in applied social policy research.

A
  • Funding for research comes from government and other agencies, who will only fund things which fit their interests. Funding can also limit the paradigms of certain research
  • Many sociologists have different conceptions of what social problems are, and what necessary measures are to be used.
  • Sociological research may oppose the interests of the government and may create more social problems
  • Some sociologists believe involvement in policy making contributes to the social policies which create inequalities.
55
Q

What is the post-modernist view on whether sociology should be involved in social policies

A

Sociology should not be involved in social policy research, as no contributions can be made
- Bauman and May suggest sociology only provides interpretations of the world, rather than universal truths social policies should be based on.