theory and methods - can sociology be a science? Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

What are the three main arguments on whether sociology can be a science?

A
  • YES
  • NO
  • Is science as scientific as it claims?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who argues that YES sociology can be a science?

A

Positivists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do positivists claim?

A
  • we should study society using scientific methods
  • must look for empirical evidence
  • objective and value-free
  • we should study social facts
  • use quantitative methods
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Auguste Comte argue?

A
  • sociology should be based upon the same methods as natural science
  • if we can find ‘facts’ about society we could then identify a cause and effect relationship and laws in society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Emile Durkheim argue?

A
  • social facts can be objectively measured
  • society can be measured in the same way as the natural world
  • he used the comparative method to study suicide
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can Durkheim be criticised?

A
  • he claimed to use positivist scientific methods BUT also linked to the idea of social integration and moral regulation which aren’t quantifiable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who argues that sociology isn’t a science?

A

Interpretivists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What do interpretivists claim?

A
  • people cannot be studied in the same way as the physical world
  • the problems with studying people:
  • prediction - Can we predict human behaviour?
  • artificiality
  • ethical issues
  • Hawthorne effect
  • validity
  • empirical observation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Karl Popper introduce?

A
  • the falsification principle
  • we need to take the approach of falsifying our findings in sociology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does falsification show that sociology can’t be a science?

A
  • Popper suggests sociology isn’t a science as it’s very difficult to falsify in society due to the number of variables that can’t be controlled
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does Thomas Khun introduce?

A

paradigms = set ideas and values that scientific research is based within
- science only moves forward when one paradigm is replaced with another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does paradigms show that sociology cannot be a science?

A
  • sociology can’t be a science because there are a range of different sociological perspectives or different paradigms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the realist perspective question?

A
  • whether science is really as scientific as it claims to be
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the realist perspective challenge the criteria of science?

A
  • not all phenomena can be observed - even scientists cannot observe everything
  • Popper is wrong to claim that science is simply limited to the observable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by open and closed systems?

A
  • not all scientific experiments take place in ‘closed systems’, such as the weather and other environmental issues
  • therefore researching the natural world and the social world = not all variables can be controlled
  • scientists are wrong to discount sociology just because it doesn’t operate in closed systems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the argument of the postmodernists?

A
  • sociology cannot be a science
17
Q

What do postmodernists claim?

A
  • science is just a metanarrative
  • research is a social construction created by the researcher
  • claims of objectivity and value freedom are untrue
  • critical of the