Theory of mind Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of mentalization?

Also called theory of mind

A

Interpretation of ones own and others behaviour as a result of mental states, such as wishes, feelings and opinions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are Flavells two levels of visual perceptive knowledge?

A

Level 1: Understanding that other people look at the world around them

Level 2: An understanding what other people are seeing (from another angle or something they can/cannot see).

-> Same ability as level 1 but with the knowledge, that things can look different from different angles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the three mountain problem?

Which developmental stage does it show?

A

Here children were shown a model of a mountain constellation and then put on one side. Then they were asked what does a doll from this angle see?

Kids under 7 had difficulties with this, because they still think egocentric
Children over 6 showed an awareness of different perspectives, but had issues.

Children who do not pass this test, are in the preoperational stage

Children who pass this test are in the concrete operational stage

This was an experiment by Piaget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are citicisms to the three mountain problem?

A

The problem is seen as too difficult and complex. Children have no experience with mountains

In the two dolls study children down to the age of 4 years were able to do the task!

When the children got more visual cues (such as stickers on each sides of the mountains they were able to pass this test

=> This remings me of another thing with orentation or something, but I forgot what it was?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When does a change in the visual perspective taking occur?

A

Around 2 years of age.

Children are able to place object in a way that another person can see them, even if they cannot

Around 3 years of age they can also place them in positions where the other person cannot see them. This was not possible for children under 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do toddlers talk so weird?

And what do the two main dudes say about it?
(and what are their evidences?)

A

Piaget: They are egocentric and cannot take the perspective of others.
-> Collective monologues
This changes because they learn to consider others and develop the cognitive abilities for that
Evidence: Young children explain the rules of a game to blind people the same as to not blind people. (8th graders could do this, 2nd graders not)

Vigotsky: They talk not to communicate, but to solve problems, plan and regulate their actions.
-> No communication intention = not egocentric!
This changes, because toddlers have to internalize language as a tool for thinking from their social surroundings.
Evidence: Young children do talk with themselves (Private speech/private signing)
-> As a tool for selfregulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When do children understand that others have desires?

A

18 months

They also understand that they are different from their own ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When do children understand that the goal of an action and the action itsself are not the same?

A

3 year olds do not pass this
4 year olds do understand this.

Example: One ends up in a place, even though they did not want to end up ther

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the main tests used to test for mentalization/theory of mind?

A

False-belief tasks like:

Unexptected transfer task

Unexpected contents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a False-belief task?

What are examples of this?

When do children usually pass this task?

A

A scenario where someone holds a belief that is contrary to reality, and the participant is asked to predict the person’s behavior based on that false belief.

Unexpected contents task:

A box of, crayons is labeled “Smarties.” When asked what the child think is inside, they are likely to say smarties based on the label. However, upon opening the box, it is revealed to contain unexpected contents, like pencils. This task assesses the child’s ability to reconcile their initial belief with new, conflicting information.

Unexpected transfer task:

A boy who leaves chocolate on a shelf and then leaves the room. His mother puts it in the fridge. To pass the task, the child must understand that the boy, upon returning, holds the false belief that his chocolate is still on the shelf.

Children on average pass this task around the age of 4 years
(3-5 years)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are criticisms to the False-belief task?

A

It is rather an issue communication/not understanding the question. When asked: “Where does the person look first?

More young kids passed. Because the first makes them aware of multiple possibilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Unexpected contents task?

When do children usually pass this test?

A

Here one tests the childs understanding that they themselves have made a mistake.

experimenters ask children what they believe to be the contents of a box that looks as though it holds Smarties. After the child guesses “Smarties”, it is shown that the box in fact contained pencils. The experimenter then re-closes the box and asks the child what she thinks another person, who has not been shown the true contents of the box, will think is inside. The child passes the task if he/she responds that another person will think that “Smarties” exist in the box, but fails the task if she responds that another person will think that the box contains pencils.

Children usually pass this test around an age of 4 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are citicism to the unexpected content task?

A

When asked: “What did you think was in the box?” Children understand: “What was in the box?”

When first smarties are in the box and the child sees them being exchanged younger children still answer right
(because there was smarties in it and they saw it!)
->True belief task!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The results of the unexpected content task could be part of which phenomenon?

A

Childhood amnesia, because one does not remember or store everything that one does! That would be counterproductive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are experiments showing implicit mentalization?

Implicit = without language/not directly expressed

A

2 year olds watched a woman putting a ball into a basket, which was moved without her noticing. They then focused (eye tracking+brain scanning) on the basket of where the ball should have been.

Similar studies have shown this with 6 month olds!

This shows that they maybe understand, but cannot verbalize it

There are many studies which show such things.
BUT: Difficulties with replication and interpretation (generalization…)
VERY CONTROVERSAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are theoretical explanations of theory of mind?

A

Nativistic: “Theory of mind”-module is available with 18 months of age

Mindreading system: is made of the modules:
1. intentionality detector
2. look direction detector
3. Common attention mechanism
The first ones are available earlier the last one later (2 years)

17
Q

How does simulation theory explain theory of mind?

A

Simulation theory says that the child becomes aware of their own thoughts and then transfers them onto others.

Development happens, because they become more aware AND their cognitive power increases

18
Q

What is the challenge that theory of mind theories try to explain?

A

How it can be, that children have super early theory of mind concepts but still have difficultires with it later as toddlers.

19
Q

What is the two system explanation of theory of mind?

A

System 1: A child is intuitivly aware of what people look at and thereby motives
-> low resource use
-> inflexible
-> born with it

System 2: A child learns the ability to understand that others can have knowledge that is different from reality.
-> uses many resources
-> more flexible
-> has to be learned
-> System 2 is needed for solving unexpected contents task

20
Q

What are other theories that explain theory of mind?

A

Social constructivists say: Everything is socially learned

Psychodynamics say: It is a consequence of (early) attachment and its primary goal. Bad mentalization is caused by bad attachment styles.
(think borderline who have bad attachment and missing mentalization)
-> Research in children does not really indicate this

21
Q

When does pretend play first appear?

A

Around the age of 15-18 months

22
Q

When do children begin to lie?

When do children lie to manipulate others knowledge?

A

Around 2 years they lie to change outcome

Around 5 years to manipulate others knowledge

Here they do not understand, that it influences others knowledge, but they just want a different outcome.

23
Q

What are some experiments that test for lying?

A

Two baskets; one could be locked, one has candy. Then a robber comes. Robber asks the child where the candy is, and they can lie!

Getting a gift they didn’t want/like (e.g. a piece of soap)
-> They lie to be polite
-> 3 year olds do that

They get to choose a toy to play with, but another kid always takes the same toy the choose.
-> 5 year olds do that

24
Q

What is first order belief attribution?

A

Thinking about what another person thinks of the world

25
Q

What is second order belief attribution?

A

Thinking about what another person thinks about what another person thinks!

26
Q

What is an experiment that tests for second order belief attribution?

A

Ice-cream story:

John, Mary want to get ice cream.
Mary forgot money -> leaves
Ice cream man tells john he goes to another spot
Ice cream man meets mary later and tells about other spot
John wants to tell mary - Mom said mary went for ice cream
Where does John go?

27
Q

When do children pass the second order blief test?

A

Around 6 years of age!

It is unsure why younger children do not pass this.
Maybe because they are missing the ability or maybe because it is too complex. Easier formats can be passed by younger children!

27
Q

What are factors that do (not) create difference in individual development of theory of mind?

A

Genetics have nothing to say

Parents who talk about mental states develop earlier ToM

Shy children develop earlier ToM

Having siblings helps to develop ealier ToM

Autism

Sight and speech difficulties
(probably because of difficulties with social learning)

27
Q

What are cultural factors that impact the development of theory of mind?

A

Schooling helps

Play opportunities help

There are differences between cultures, but it is not clear, what they are

28
Q

Which conditions are connected to issues of theory of mind?

When do they pass first/second order tests?

A

Autism and delayed signers

They usually pass first order belief tests with 9 years
(usual is 4 years)

They usually pass second order belief test with 18 years
(usual is 6-7 years)

But this seems not to be because of one module that does not work, but rather a complex interacting issues of perception, communication and cognition.

Typical and down syndrom children could do the test (Sally&Ann with the marble)

An example of research on atypical development helps understanding typical development

29
Q

What is associated with good theory of mind?

A

Good social skills but not empathy (?)

30
Q

What is reality reasoning?

A

Is the reasoning where reality is used as a frame of reference

31
Q

What is Belief reasoning?

A

Is the reasoning that represents a fully fledged theory of mind

32
Q

What is Perceptual Access Reasoning?

A

The child simulates what the person perceives. The person does not perceive the real contents. Which is why they answer something else (either smarties or another irrelevant thing). The child thinks that the other knows that something was meddled with, but cannot perceive (see) what is really inside it now?
The child only observes the current situation

-> This uses true belief tasks, where the expected condition is restored! RR and BR pass this, but not PAR

Bsp: Maxi chocolate: watches mom consider moving the chocolate. When asked PAR children answer that maxi does not know!

It is a proposed reasoning method that children use between reality reasoning and belief reasoning! They can pass the classic false belief tasks with it, without actually having theory of mind!

PAR was invented to explain how children can pass false belief tasks, without understanding them

33
Q

Why could it be that infants seemingly pass some theory of mind tests?

A

Because they have the rudimentary function of:

See -> getting it wrong/right

They see that another person can or cannot see something, which then enables them to react acordingly to it.

They do not have the concept of somebody knowing something (yet)!

34
Q

What is an alternative experiment to the two dolls experiment?

A

The two dolls experiment:

two dolls (police and other) were used and the children had to hide the other doll from the police doll, including walls.

Here they were able to hide the other doll as young as 4 years old!