TMS Flashcards

1
Q

Paragraph 1

TMS is a

A

non-invasive technique used in CN to alter the normal workings of neural pathways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Paragraph 1

How does TMS work?

A
  • High intensity MF next to scalp surface
  • Indues eletrical current
  • Current alters membrane potential of neurons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Paragraph 1

The current serves to alter the membrane potential of neurons in the area…

A

Thus altering the rate and probability of which they will fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Paragraph 1

If the frequency at which the TMS stimulation is pulsed…

A

Is greater than 1 Hz, it is known as receptive TMS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Paragraph 1

Whether the stimulation induces an excitatory or inhibitory effect….

A

Is contigent on whether the pulse is slow or repetitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Paragraph 2

What are the studies?

A

O’Reardon et al., 2007
McNamara et al., 2001
Reid et al., 1998
Berlim et al., 2014

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

O’Reardon et al., 2007

Method

A
  • Large scale study
  • Patients reported resistance to Anti’Ds
  • PFC TMS for 6 weeks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

O’Reardon et al., 2007

Findings (2)

A
  • Decreased in S-R depressive symptoms

- TMS group 2x as likely to be in remission at 6 weeks compared to control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

McNamara et al., 2001

Method

A
  • Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs investigating TMS and depression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

McNamara et al., 2001

Findings

A

Highly significant (p<0.001) beneficial effect of TMS compared to control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reid et al., 1998

A
  • No withdrawals, few temporary side effects of TMS in treating depression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reid et al., 1998

2 side effects

A

Transient headache

Discomfort at stimulation site

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Paragraph 2

However, it has remained elusive….

A

As to how long these beneficial effects last

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Berlim et al., 2014

Method

A

Meta-analysis of 29 RCT’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Berlim et al., 2014

Findings

A

~1/5 of patients remained in remission following the sessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Paragraph 3

Studies?

A

Barwood et al., 2011

Li et al., 2015

17
Q

Barwood et al., 2011

Method

A

Inhibitory rTMS to 6 Aphasia patients over 10 days

18
Q

Barwood et al., 2011

Findings

A

Improvements reported in picture naming, sentence complexity and receptive lanuage 2 months post-stimulation COMPARED TO SHAM COIL

19
Q

Barwood et al., 2011

The mechanisms from which the improvements occurred…

A

Were from the downregulation of overactivity in the brain region associated with the deficits

20
Q

Barwood et al., 2011

Criticism of the study

A

Small sample size – unclear whether findings can be further replicated

21
Q

Li et al., (2015)

A

Meta analysis of 4 RCT’s indicated a significant effect of rTMS in strengthening picture naming skills only

22
Q

Paragraph 3

Finishing sentence

A

Further investigation may be required to validate the benefits of TMS in a larger range of skills

23
Q

There is some evidence to suggest that TMS can be used in cognitive enhancement,

A

For example, phonological STM

24
Q

Paragraph 4

Studies (4)

A

Kirschen et al., 2006
Luber et al., 2007
Osaka et al., 2007
Luber & Lisbany, 2014

25
Kirschen et al., 2006
Marked improvements in accuracy/recall speed of phonologically similar words compared control
26
Luber et al., 2007 Method
5 Hz stimulation applied during delay period of a delayed match-to-sample paradigm
27
Luber et al., 2007
Improvements in reaction time and accuracy
28
Osaka et al., 2007
Stimulation to the DLPC resulted in significant VERBAL working memory impairments in a reading span test
29
Luber & Lisbany, 2014
The efficacy of TMS in cognitive enhancement may be attributable to the frequency of stimualtion/site of stimulus application
30
Paragraph 5 Studies
Cohen et al., 1997 Lomber et al., 1999 Ruff et al., 2009
31
TMS can mimic the effect of a lesino...thus,
it can broaden the scope of knowledge and research avenues available to cognitive neuroscientists
32
Cohen et al., 1997
TMS allowed for the discovery of the role of the visual cortex in Braille-reading, done so by inducing false lesions on sighted pps
33
Paragraph 5 On the other hand... (2 studies)
Lomber et al., 1999 Ruff et al., 2009
34
Lomber et al., 1999
TMS for lesion studies may have poor spatial specificity
35
Lomber et al., 1999 Consequence of this is that...
Region specific consequences of the stimulation may not always be clear
36
Ruff et al., (1999)
This limitation may be somewhat compensated for by the utilisation of other neuroimaging technqiues such as fMRI