Topic 13: systematic error in research Flashcards

(18 cards)

1
Q

Give 2 types of bias in research

A

1) Selection bias = from mistakes during selection of study sample
2) Information bias = from mistakes during measurment of variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define information bias

A
  • Wrong/inaccurate assessment of exposure/disease outcome variables
  • Due to researcher = unintentionally
  • Due to participant = un/intentionally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe information bias based on researcher

A
  • Wrong diagnosis = clinical error
  • Wrong measurement = faulty intrument
  • Wrong measurement = poor training
  • Mistake recording/transferring data = paper to electronic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe information bias based on participant

A
  • Wrong answer:
    > Misinterpret question
    > Sensitive issue
    > Poor recall
    > Intentionally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define response bias

A
  • Information bias from participant action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give 6 types of information bias

A

1) Misclassification
2) Recall
3) Interviewer
4) Hawthorne effect
5) Observer
6) Surveillance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define misclassification bias

A
  • Error in classifying patient as being exposed/having disease
  • Due to instrument inaccuracy
  • In any study design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define recall bias

A
  • Report past exposures wrong
  • May over/under report
  • In case-control studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define interviewer bias

A
  • Researcher’s knowledge + perception = influnce questions
  • May ask leading questions/inconsistent between cases
  • In any study design = more when researcher not blinded to participants status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Hawthorne effect

A
  • Participants act differently when they know they are being observed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define observer bias

A
  • Researcher’s preconceived expectations of what they should find
  • More if not blinded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define surveillance bias

A
  • Group with known exposure = followed more closely than comparison group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give methods to reduce bias

A

1) Design study = minimize chance for bias
- Use more than 1 control
2) Mutually exclusive criteria to define exposed = no overlap between exposed/non-exposed
3) Strict guidlines for data collection
- Train assessors to obtain data consistently
- More than 1 assessor = identical training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can information bias affect study?

A
  • To investigate association = factors measured accurately
  • Bias = association distorted
  • From participants > researchers
  • Affects studies relying on self-report = assume information bias to some extent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe validity

A
  • Extent of measuring tool measures accurately what it’s meant to measure
  • Criterion validity = result from tool compared to gold standard
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define internal validity

A
  • Findings had no bias/error = conclusions correct
17
Q

Define external validity

A
  • If a study has no bias/error doesnt mean findings can be generalized to other circumstances
  • E.g. a study for effect of medication on men cannot be extrapolated to women
18
Q

Describe reliability

A
  • Overall consistency of measure = producing same results under same conditions again
  • Intra-observer reliability = consistency in results from tool used by same researcher on many occasions
  • Inter-observer reliability = consistency in results of same group between 2+ researchers