Topic 3: Motivation Flashcards

1
Q

What did Munroe and Chandler investigate

A

Relationship between imagery/self confidence/self efficacy

Key research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

M+C aim

A

To investigate relationship between imagery (MG-M)/self cofidence/self efficacy
Specifically to see if younger athletes showed same benefits as adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

M+C sample

A

122 m+f soccer players
Canadian
11-14 y/o
Over 6 years mean experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

M+C Method

A

.parental and participant consent obtained
.demographics questionnaire taken (age, gender etc)
.3 measures taken: imagery, self.c, self.e
.P’s take sports imagery questionnaire (imagery), CTAI-2C questionnaire (self.c) and self efficacy questionnaire (self. e)
.questionnaires took 15 mins approx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

M+C results

A

All imagery subscales correlated strongly and positively

MG-M subscale was strongest correlation with both SEQ and CTAI-2C scores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

M+C conclusion

A

MG-M is a strong predictor of self confidence and self efficacy regardless of age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vealy’s model

A

model of sport confidence

3 aspects affecting sport confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Vealy’s 3 aspects

A

Trait sport confidence
State sport confidence
Competitive orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

trait sport confidence

A

.your belief in your general sports ability

.based on previous experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

state sport confidence

A

.ability to perform in specific sporting context e.g pen in football/free throw in b.ball
.confidence can change quite quickly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

competitive orientation

A

drive to succeed/how they define sporting success in a given situation
.are they driven by outcome orientation or performance orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

outcome orientation

A

driven by winning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

performance orientation

A

driven by performing well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Bandura investigate

A

sporting self efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bandura high self efficacy

A

individual know what is required from them and is confident they can do it successfully

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bandura low self efficacy

A

individual is unclear on what is needed to be successful or if they do know, is not confident on being able to do it

17
Q

Bandura 4 factors effecting self efficacy

A

previous personal achievement
vicarious experience
verbal persuasion
emotional arousal

18
Q

previous personal achievement

A

better past experiences = higher self efficacy

19
Q

vicarious experience

A

is we see someone similar to us demonstrate a skill we are more likely to think we can do it

20
Q

verbal persuasion

A

encouraging praise can lead to higher belief/self efficacy

21
Q

emotional arousal

A

need to be emotionally ready and optimally aroused

22
Q

What did Van Raalte investigate

23
Q

self talk def

A

deliberate statements made by an athlete during a performance
can be positive or negative
can be focused on task of confidence

24
Q

instructional self talk

A

self talk focused on the task or aspects of it

25
motivational self talk
self talk focused on improving confidence
26
Van Raalte sample
60 undergraduates | all male
27
Van Raalte procedure
.randomly assigned to p.s.t/n.s.t/control group .positive repeated "you can do it! .negative repeated "you cannot do it" .control said nothing .15 dart throws, measured mean distance away from centre bull
28
Van Raalte results
positive showed better accuracy than negative (P<0.05) | no sig dif between negative and control
29
What did Epstein investigate
underaged girls | TARGET approach
30
TARGET approach
``` Tasks Authority Reward Grouping Evaluation Timing ```
31
Epstein: Task
.ensure training is varied and challenging | .focus on new skills rather than comparison
32
Epstein: authority
let athletes make own decisions and evaluate themselves
33
Epstein: reward
focus rewards on individual improvement rather than comparing
34
Epstein: grouping
give chances to work together rather than against each other
35
Epstein: evaluating
.specific feedback on how to improve | .focused on effort
36
Epstein: timing
.give enough time for mastery of skills | .give feedback ASAP