Topic 4/5 - Hart Flashcards

(60 cards)

1
Q

Who was H.L.A. Hart?

A

A seminal legal philosopher and Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Oxford from 1954 to 1969.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Hart’s book The Concept of Law represent?

A

A modern restatement of legal positivism originally articulated by Bentham and Austin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What approach does Hart emphasize in The Concept of Law?

A

A rigorous, ‘lawyerlike’ approach focusing on careful analysis of language and legal practice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Hart’s aim in legal theory?

A

To provide a descriptive and empirical study of legal theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the significance of clear definitions in Hart’s methodology?

A

They are crucial for understanding legal concepts, despite some inherent ambiguity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does Hart challenge Austin’s theory of law?

A

By proposing that law is a system of rules, not merely commands backed by threats.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two types of points of view Hart distinguishes?

A
  • Internal point of view
  • External point of view
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the internal point of view entail?

A

Seeing law from the perspective of those who accept and use the rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the external point of view involve?

A

Analyzing law objectively as an observer without necessarily accepting the rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the three essential characteristics of a legal system according to Hart?

A
  • Existence of rules
  • Official recognition of those rules
  • Continuity of legal order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the union of primary and secondary rules signify?

A

The structure of law where primary rules impose duties and secondary rules provide methods for handling primary rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the rule of recognition?

A

A fundamental secondary rule that determines what counts as valid law within a system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is the rule of recognition understood in terms of empirical nature?

A

It is based on practices accepted by officials and judges.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What philosophical challenges does Hart acknowledge regarding rule-following?

A

Challenges of vagueness and interpretation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who notably criticized Hart’s theory?

A

Ronald Dworkin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Hart’s view on law as an empirical study?

A

He emphasizes description and analysis over prescription.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does Hart assert about the nature of legal positivism?

A

Law is identified by social facts rather than moral content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are primary rules?

A

Rules that impose duties, obligations, or prohibitions on individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are secondary rules?

A

Rules about primary rules that provide mechanisms for creating, changing, and adjudicating primary rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

List the three important classes of secondary rules identified by Hart.

A
  • Rule of Recognition
  • Rule of Change
  • Rule of Adjudication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the role of the rule of change?

A

It allows the legal system to adapt by permitting laws to be introduced, amended, or repealed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the role of the rule of adjudication?

A

Establishes who has the authority to resolve disputes about primary rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What must a legal system achieve for its existence?

A

Officials must accept the rule of recognition and valid legal rules must be generally obeyed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How does Hart respond to Dworkin’s criticisms in the Postscript?

A

By reaffirming the descriptive nature of his theory and denying that legal theory should involve moral justification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Fill in the blank: The rule of recognition is accepted by ______.
[legal officials]
26
What does Hart argue regarding unjust legal systems?
They qualify as law if they meet the rule of recognition and conditions of effectiveness.
27
What is Dworkin's critique of Hart's empirical approach?
Law cannot be solely a matter of fact because hard cases reveal interpretive elements.
28
How does Dworkin view the role of judges?
Judges have a duty to interpret the law in its best moral light.
29
What is the key difference between Hart's and Dworkin's views on the nature of law?
* Hart: Descriptive, empirical legal positivism * Dworkin: Normative, interpretive theory
30
True or False: Hart believes that law's existence depends on moral merit.
False
31
What does Hart say about judicial discretion?
Judicial discretion exists but does not undermine the overall structure of law.
32
What does Dworkin argue regarding hard cases?
They are central to law and require interpretation.
33
According to Hart, what is the relationship between law and morality?
Hart insists on a strict separation.
34
What is a key quote from Hart regarding the rule of recognition?
'The existence of the rule of recognition is a matter of empirical fact.'
35
What is a key quote from Dworkin regarding hard cases?
'All hard cases… do not concern law at all' if law is identified solely by the RoR.
36
Fill in the blank: Hart describes his work as an ______ study of legal theory.
[empirical]
37
What is Hart's legal theory characterized as?
Descriptive, empirical legal positivism
38
What type of legal theory does Dworkin advocate for?
Normative, interpretive theory
39
What is the Rule of Recognition (RoR) according to Hart?
Ultimate legal rule, empirical, social acceptance
40
How does Dworkin view the Rule of Recognition?
Insufficient to identify law in hard cases; law includes principles
41
What is Hart's view on the judicial role?
Application of rules, some discretion
42
How does Dworkin describe the judicial role?
Interpretation guided by principles, minimal discretion
43
What is Hart's stance on the relationship between law and morality?
Strict separation
44
What does Dworkin argue about law and morality?
Law inherently moral
45
How does Hart categorize 'hard cases'?
Outside law or involve judicial discretion
46
What does Dworkin assert about 'hard cases'?
Central to law, requiring interpretation
47
What is Dworkin's criticism of Hart's Rule of Recognition?
Fails to account for 'hard cases'
48
What is Hart's fundamental aim with his legal theory?
Explain how laws are identified in legal systems based on social facts
49
What is the difference between Hart's and Dworkin's approaches?
Hart is descriptive; Dworkin is normative and justificatory
50
How does Hart view the flexibility of legal language?
Strengthens positivist claim that law can be described without reference to morality
51
What analogy does Hart use to describe the role of judges?
Judges are like pianists performing Beethoven
52
What principle does Hart reference to avoid retrospective issues?
nulla poena sine lege (no retrospective criminal liability)
53
What does Hart say about the distinction between rules and principles?
Acknowledges differences but disagrees with Dworkin's sharp dichotomy
54
What case does Hart use to illustrate the conflict between rules and principles?
Riggs v Palmer
55
What does Hart argue about morally abhorrent legal systems?
They are still legal systems according to his descriptive theory
56
What is Hart's position regarding the descriptive nature of legal theory?
Legal theory is descriptive, not normative
57
How does Hart differentiate between law and morality?
Even morally evil systems can be legal systems if they meet RoR criteria
58
What insight does Hart provide about participants in legal practice?
Richer accounts come from those participating within the practice
59
What is the core of the debate between Hart and Dworkin?
Hart describes law as it is; Dworkin prescribes how law ought to be justified
60
True or False: Hart believes all law is interpretation and morality as Dworkin claims.
False