Topic 9 - Dworkin Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

What does Dworkin’s theory challenge?

A

Legal positivism

Dworkin emphasizes the power of legal argument over fixed rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a key difference in Dworkin’s theory compared to positivist theories?

A

Lacks a ‘master rule’

This complexity differentiates it from legal positivism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does Dworkin critique fixed theories of law?

A

He argues against providing fixed ‘places’ for determining the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What concept does Hart use to defend positivism?

A

‘Minimum content of natural law’

Hart argues against the integration of moral arguments into legal validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What example does Hart use to illustrate settled meanings in law?

A

Rule about vehicles in a park

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Dworkin’s ‘interpretive concept’?

A

Making the best of something that it can be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What types of interpretation does Dworkin distinguish?

A
  • Constructive or artistic interpretation
  • Scientific interpretation
  • Conversational interpretation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who is Judge Hercules in Dworkin’s theory?

A

An ideal judge who measures legal arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Judge Hercules accept as part of legal argumentation?

A

Settled practices of the legal system and general political theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two types of arguments Dworkin distinguishes?

A
  • Arguments of principle (rights)
  • Arguments of policy (community goals)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does ‘fit’ refer to in legal arguments?

A

Consistency with statutes and past cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does ‘substance’ involve in legal reasoning?

A

Fairness and justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case does Dworkin analyze to demonstrate substantive arguments?

A

McLoughlin v O’Brian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What distinction does Dworkin make between ‘concepts’ and ‘conceptions’?

A
  • Concepts: Uncontroversial ideas
  • Conceptions: Areas of controversy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Dworkin’s view on the purpose of law?

A

To restrain governmental coercion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the ‘one right answer’ thesis?

A

There is generally one right answer to legal questions, even if hard to identify.

17
Q

True or False: Dworkin believes moral judgments are unnecessary to identify law.

A

False

Dworkin criticizes Hart’s claim regarding moral judgments.

18
Q

What does Dworkin say about Raz’s ‘social sources’ theory?

A

It isn’t supported by legal practice.

19
Q

What are the stages in legal interpretation outlined by Dworkin?

A
  • Semantic
  • Jurisprudential
  • Doctrinal
  • Adjudicative
20
Q

What is Dworkin’s concept of law as integrity?

A

Law should be interpreted as a coherent system of principles.

21
Q

What does Dworkin emphasize about judicial reasoning?

A

Judges should focus on individual rights, not community goals.

22
Q

What are the pros of Dworkin’s theory?

A
  • Addresses moral disagreement
  • Provides coherence
  • Respects judicial reasoning and rights
  • Encourages constructive interpretation
  • Enhances legal objectivity
  • Critiques positivism’s moral dimensions
23
Q

What is a criticism of Dworkin’s ‘one right answer’ thesis?

A

It may be overly optimistic or unrealistic.

24
Q

What complexity does Dworkin’s theory face compared to positivism?

A

Lacks simplicity of master rules.

25
What is a potential concern with Dworkin's reliance on moral principles?
Judicial overreach and activism.
26
What ambiguity is criticized in Dworkin's moral foundations?
Reliance on vague conceptions of political morality.
27
What tension does Dworkin's critique of soft positivism highlight?
Role of social sources vs. moral reasoning.
28
What challenge does Dworkin's theory face in international law?
Limited applicability due to lack of uniform structures.
29
How does Hart's foundation of law differ from Dworkin's?
Hart emphasizes a 'rule of recognition'; Dworkin focuses on interpretive practice.
30
What does Hart allow regarding the relationship between law and morality?
A separation between law and morality.
31
How does Dworkin's ideal judge differ from Hart's view on judicial decision-making?
Judge Hercules finds the 'one right answer', limiting discretion.
32
What is Kelsen's theory based on?
The fundamental norm (Grundnorm).
33
What methodology does Dworkin propose for legal interpretation?
Constructive interpretation.