Topic 5 (Year 12): Ontological argument Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

Ontology definition.

A

The branch of philosophy which explores the concept of existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deductive argument definition.

A

No physical evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Saint Anselm’s first argument of the ontological argument? (P1-2, C)

A

P1 - God is “that than which nothing greater can be conceived”.
P2 - Real or existent things are greater than imaginary ones (only in the mind as an idea).
C - God must exist; the concept of of God is not as great as one that exists in reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why does Anslem think God must exist?

A

We can imagine him and existence is part of God’s definition - it’s one of his characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Saint Anselm’s second argument of the ontological argument?

A

It is impossible for God not to exist, he is unsurpassable in all ways, therefore he must be a necessary being as it’s a predicate of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why does Anselm say he needs no evidence for the existence of God?

A

It is something that we know simply by considering the concept of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Anselm say is an analytic proposition?

A

“God exists.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Anselm say about atheists?

A

He says “the atheist is a fool” because everyone has the same definition of God, and therefore this universal definition must mean God exists necessarily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is Descartes’ Perfect Being compared to a triangle?

A

Descartes said existence belonged analytically to God, as three angles are analytically predicated to a triangle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the concept of Descartes’ Perfect Being? (2 points)

A
  • While we may be certain of our existence, not everyone has the same notion of this perfect being.
  • He claims an imperfect being cannot think of a perfect being.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why does Aquinas disagree with Anselm’s arguments? (3 points)

A
  • Aquinas says that, while he still believes in God, a priori arguments cannot demonstrate the existence of God and that not everybody has the same definition of God.
  • He also argues that we can conceive of God not existing, and we cannot fully understand the concept of God anyways.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why does Gaunilo of Marmoutier disagree with Anselm’s arguments?

A

He says it permits anything to be thought into existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What example does Gaunilo give in his criticism? Explain. (2 points)

A
  • The perfect (mythical) lost island - he says that if it did not exist, it would be a contradiction to say it was perfect because perfection is a part of existence.
  • However, Gaunilo says perfection does not exist and there is no trace of these perfect beings existing either.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Kant’s first objection to Descartes’ Perfect Being?

A

Not everyone believes the same definition of God to be correct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Kant’s second objection to Descartes’ Perfect Being?

A

Existence is not a predicate, to say something exists adds nothing at all to the idea of a thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What example does Kant use to back up his second objection?

A

Money - the difference between having and imagining money.

17
Q

Why does Kant use this example? (2 points)

A
  • He uses this to say that wehn something exists, this does not add anything to the idea or concept.
  • Predicates, however, do add to a concept, so existence is not a predicate.