Tort Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

Tort

A
  • A violation of duty imposed by civil law
  • How obligation is created: The civil law imposes duties of conduct on all persons
  • Possible result: Money damages for plaintiff
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Contract

A
  • Legally enforceable promise or set of promises
  • How obligation is created: The parties agree on a contract, which creates duties for both
  • Possible result: Money damages for plaintiff
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criminal Law

A
  • Rules that permit a government to punish certain behavior by fine or imprisonment
  • How obligation is created: The criminal law prohibits certain conduct
  • Possible result: Punishment for defendant, including prison and/or fine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intentional Tort

A
  • Harm caused by a deliberate action, doesn’t mean the defendant intended to cause harm to the plaintiff.
    • *Intent goes to doing the act, not the results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Defamation Tort

A

False statements that harm someones reputation.

  • Libel: Written (newspaper)
  • Slander: Oral (opinion often cant be proven)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Slander per se

A

Don’t have to prove injury if false statement is about sexual behavior, serious crimes, contagious diseases, professional abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Compensatory damages

A

Money intended to restore a plaintiff to the position he was before the injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Punitive Damages

A

Damages that are intended to punish the defendant for conduct that is extreme and outrageous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What relationship has the Supreme Court required between compensatory and punitive damages?

A

Damages should not normally exceed a single digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Elements of a defamation case

A

Plaintiff must prove all elements to win

  • Defamatory Statement: The statement is likely to harm another persons reputation
  • Falseness: Statement has to be untrue
  • Communicated: Statement communicated to another person
  • Injury: Show some sort or injury unless slander per se
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Actual Malice

A

The defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard of the truth
*part of defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Battery

A

Intentional touching of another person in a way that is harmful or offensive
-Offended or hurt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Assault

A

An act that makes a person reasonably fear battery forthcoming
-FEAR imminent battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conversion

A

Taking or using someone else’s personal property without consent.
o Personal property: any possession other than land or structure permanently attached to the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Negligent tort

A

A breach of duty or a failure of one party to exercise the standard of care required by law, resulting in damage to the party to whom the duty was owed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Elements of Negligent Tort

A
  • Duty of due care: defendant had a legal responsibility to the plaintiff
  • Breach: defendant breached her duty of care or failed to meet her legal obligations
  • Factual Causes: defendants conduct actually caused the injury
  • Proximate cause: it was foreseeable that conduct like the defendants might cause this type of harm
  • Damages: plaintiff has actually been hurt or suffered a measurable loss
17
Q

Dram Act

A

Business are liable for serving drinks to intoxicated customers who later cause harm

18
Q

Peoples special duties to others

A
  • Special Duty: Landowners
  • Special Duty: Professional
  • Special Duty: Hiring and Retention
19
Q

Special Duty: Landowners

A
  • Trespassing adults: Lowest liability
  • Trespassing Children: Mid-level liability
  • Licensee: Higher liability (Permission)
  • Invitee: Highest liability (Open to public)
20
Q

Breach of Duty

A

The plaintiff must show the defendant did not meet the legal duty of care

21
Q

Negligence Per Se

A

When a legislature sets a minimum standard of care for a particular activity, in order to protect a certain group of people, and a violation of the statue injures a member of that group. (sidewalk in fount of ur house must be clear)

22
Q

Causation

A

The defendants breach of duty caused the plaintiffs harm.

  • Factual cause
  • Proximate cause
23
Q

Factual Cause

A

Defendant’s breach led to the ultimate harm

*Injury wouldn’t have occurred if it wasn’t for

24
Q

Proximate Cause

A

The type of harm must have been reasonably foreseeable, for the defendant to be liable

25
Res Ipsa Loquitur
The facts imply that the defendant's negligence caused the accident (it speaks for itself)
26
Requirements of Res Ipsa Loquitur
- Defendant had exclusive control of the thing that caused harm - Harm wouldn't have occurred without negligence - Plaintiff had no role in causing harm
27
Contributory negligence
If the plaintiff is even slightly negligent, she recovers nothing.
28
Comparative negligence
The plaintiff may recover even if she is partially responsible. Based on % of negligence
29
Comparative negligence 50% Rule
plaintiff doesn't recover anything if he was more than 50% responsible for his own injury.
30
Assumption of the risk
A person who voluntarily enters a situation that has an obvious danger, cannot complain if she is injured. *Foreseeable risk of harm