Trusts Authorities Flashcards
(18 cards)
Knight v Knight
Identification of the 3 certainties in the creation of trusts: intention, subject matter and object
Re Adams and the Kensington Vestry
Certainty of intention
The language should impose a clear obligation onto the trustee
Testator said “in full confidence that she would do what is right” - placed a moral obligation
Lambe v Eames
Certainty of intention
Precatory words cannot be held to be a trust
“To be at her disposal in any way she may think best”
Re Kayford
Certainty of intention
Do not have to verbally express it - it can be seen through a clear action
Lassence v Tierney
Certainty of intention
If there is no intention to separate legal and equitable title, the donee will take the property absolutely as a gift
Re Steele’s Will Trusts
Certainty of intention
Precatory language exception
Copying of words from a previous case where the wording was acceptable was evidence of intention
Need to look at context as well as language
Midland Bank plc v Wyatt
Certainty of intention
Must have the intention of becoming a trust - apparent declarations are not valid
Testator did not tell the beneficiaries, and carried on using the property ‘on trust’ as a family home
Sprange v Barnard
Certainty of subject matter
Need to be able to see with precision what is part of the trust
Women said that when she dies, the husband should give whatever he doesn’t want to the nieces
Re Golay’s Will Trusts
Certainty of subject matter
Exception
‘reasonable income’ was clear because it allowed the trustees to make an objective assessment of what that might be
‘reasonable number’ would not have been clear enough
Re London Wine Co
Certainty of subject matter
For chattels, the trust property must be segregated
The wine bottles had not been individually identified
Hunter v Moss
Certainty of subject matter
For intangible property, if all shares are identical, the trust property is certain
They do not require segregation of specific identification
Palmer v Simmons
Certainty of subject matter
Linguistic uncertainty
‘bulk of my residuary estate’ has no universal meaning
‘residue of my estate’, however, is calculable
Boyce v Boyce
Certainty of subject matter
If the settlor allocates property, it must be certain who is entitled to what
The trust of houses gave X whichever she chose, and the rest was left to Y, but X died without selecting, which left the division unclear
Trust would have been valid if X was alive, but Y’s allocation became unascertainable
IRC v Broadway Cottages
Certainty of object
For a fixed trust, we need to pass the ‘complete list’ test
Must be conceptually certain who the beneficiaries are
Paul v Constance
Formality and trust
Trusts can be made orally
Milroy v Lord
3 ways to transfer title without valuable consideration:
- as an absolute gift
- as a self-declaration of trust
- nominating a third-party trustee
Subsisting beneficial interest
Formality in the creation of trusts
LPA 1925 s53(1)(c)
Must be made in writing
Land
Formality in the creation of trusts
LPA 1925 s53(1)(b)
Need to manifest and prove it in writing