Types of evidence Flashcards

(55 cards)

1
Q

2 main sources of evidence

A
  1. witness: A person who provides evidence in the form of in court testimony or our of court statement

2: real evidence: A writing or other tangible item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Judicial Notice allows the courts to…

A

assume the evidence of facts when those facts are well known and indisposable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rule 601: Competency to testify in general

Who is competent to be a witness?

A

EVERYONE, unless a rule provides otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 requirements for a witness

A
  1. Competency
  2. Personal Knowledge
  3. Oath of affirmative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Just because someone is qualified to testify does not mean that

A

what they say is believable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When state law determines the requirements of a witness

A
  • always in civil court
  • sometimes in federal court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Dead Man Act”

A

makes incompetent, a party proposing to testify about a conversation or other transaction with a person now deceased when that testimony is offered against the estate of the deceased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rule 601 requires the application of state competency law when 3 conditions are satisfied:

A

1: The issue arises in a civil action or proceeding;
2. It concerns an element of a claim or defense;
AND
3. The claim or defense is one as to which state law supplies the applicable substantive rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In a civil action brought in federal court’s diversity jurisdiction, what competency law is used?

A

The competency law of the state in which that federal court is is applicable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rule 605: Judges Competency as a witness

A

Judges may not testify at trial as a witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rule 606: Jurors Competency as a witness

If a jury is called to testify, then

A

the court must give a party an opportunity to object outside the jury’s presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rule 606: Jurors Competency as a witness

Prohibited Testimony or Others Evidence

During an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or incitement (3 things that a jury may not testify)

A

May not testify about jury deliberations, jury voting, any jurors mental processes concerning the verdict or indictment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rule 606: Jurors Competency as a witness

Prohibited Testimony or Others Evidence (3 EXCEPTIONS)

During an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or incitement

A
  1. Extraneous prejudicial info was improperly brought to the jury’s attention
  2. An outside influence was improperly brought to bear on any juror;
    OR
  3. A mistake was made in entering the verdict on the verdict form
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rule 602 Need for Personal Knowledge

A witness may testify to a matter only if…

A

the evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge may consist of the witnesses own testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rule 602 Need for Personal Knowledge

does not apply to

A

a witness expert testimony under rule 703

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The formula for if a witness’s personal knowledge can be testified

A

FP= FT

Facts perceived = facts allowed to testify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When are the witnesses facts to be testified, inadmissible?

A

When they are not facts that they personally perceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

To testify personal knowledge a witness needs to be able to do what 3 things

A

1) comprehend
2) remember
AND
3) communicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Personal Knowledge

The witness has to have evidence that is…

A

“sufficient to support a finding” of personal knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“sufficient to support a finding” of personal knowledge

A

a reasonable juror could conclude that the witness perceived, comprehends, remembers, and can communicate the facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Rule 603 Oath or Affirmation to testify truthfully

A

Before testifying, must give oath or affirmation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

NCGS Rule 601 General Rule of Competency + disqualification of witnesses

who is competent

A

everyone unless a rule says otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

NCGS Rule 601 General Rule of Competency + disqualification of witnesses

a witness is disqualified when the court determines

A

1) cannot express self directly or with interpretation
OR
2) Incapable of the duty of witness to tell the truth

24
Q

NCGS Rule 601 General Rule of Competency + disqualification of witnesses

Interested party

A

Interested party’s are disqualified

25
3 types of Evidence
1) witness 2) Item 3) Judicial notice
26
What does the court do during judicial notice
The court takes note of a general fact
27
Demonstrative evidence
merely illuminates testimony
28
demonstrative evidence can only be used if
the testimony it illustrates is admissible and it actually refers to that testimony
29
Rule 601: Competancy of a witness can differ between...
States
30
Rule 601: Competancy of a witness always applies to
Federal Cases
31
# Rule 601: Competancy of a witness Civil cases are governed by
State laws
32
# Rule 601: Competancy of a witness Can a atheist testify?
Yes, everyone is competent to testify | Another rule: cannot bring up that they are athesist
33
605: Judge competancy as a witness
- Judge cannot be a witness - Need not to objecy to preserve the issue (Plain error)
34
# Rule 606: Jurors competancy as a witness 2 times when a juror cannot be a witness
1. At the trial 2. during an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment
35
# Rule 606: Jurors competancy as a witness during an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment. What is the specific prohibited testimony or other evidence from a witness?
How the decision was made
36
# Rule 606: Jurors competancy as a witness 3 Exceptions to the rule stating that a juror cannot be a witness during an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or Inditement
1) Extranous prejudicial info was improperly brough to the jurys attention 2) An outside influence was improperly brought to bear on any juror 3) A mistake made when entering verdict on the verdict form
37
# Rule 602: Need for personal Knowldge Evidence introduced needs to be
sufficent to support a finding | (super low standard)
38
# Rule 602: Need for personal Knowldge does not apply to
expery testimony | just do not let testimony get too scientific
39
4 things needed to establish personal knowledge
1) Witness must *percieve* the facts 2) witness *understands* what it precieved 3) witness *remembers*/*comprehends* what they precieve 4) Witness must be able to *communicate*
40
# Rule 602: Need for personal Knowldge What it means to precieve the facts
see it, hear it, touch it, taste it, smell it
41
Once that evience is found to be sufficent to support a finding, the evidence goes to
wait
42
# Rule 106 Summaries When a proponet may use a summary, chart, or calculation as evidence
to prove the content of volumous writings, or photographs that cannot be conviently examined in court
43
# Rule 1006 Summaries The proponent must make *what* available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place. | and the court may do what
originials or duplicates | and the court may order the proponet to produce them in court
44
# When determining if a writing is admissible 3 frequent issues to consider: ## Footnote ☆
1. Authentication 2. The best Evidence Rule 3. Hearsay
45
What would happen if plaintiff notified defendant that they needed evidence and they failed to bring the evidence
Rule 1004(3) would allow plaintiff to offer secondary evidence to prove the contents of the writing | Including testimony from memory on what it said
46
# Rule 1007 Testimony as statement of a party to prove content May prove content of a writing, recording, or photograph by:
the testimony, the deposition, or written statement of the party who the evidence is against. | Need not account for the original
47
# Rule 1008: Functions of the Court and Jury best evidence rule In a jury trial the jury determines any issue about what 3 things?
1. An asserted writing, recording, or photograph ever existed 2. Another one produced at the trial or hearing is the original, OR 3. other evidence of content accurately reflects the content
48
A photograph can be what 2 types of evidence?
Real and demonstrative
49
Real evidence
played some role in the case
50
Demonstrative evidence
To diagram or demonstrate something
51
What to ask if the contested evidence is a writing, recording or photgraph
is the evidence offered to prove the content of the writing, recording or photograph?
52
If evidence is offered to prove the content of writing, recording or photographs, the party must take one of what 6 paths
1. Produce the origingal (1001, 1002) 2. Produce duplicate (unless a question is raised about the authenticity of the original or a duplicate would be unfair, 1003) 3. Prove an exception of 1004, and offer other evidence 4. Prove contents by written statement, testimony, or desposition of opponet 1007 5. Provide a summary if contents are volumonous, while making originals or duplicates available for copying 1006 6. prove a public recotd according to 1005
53
To get the contents in a GPS you look at what rule
best evidence rule
54
# Best evidence rule Testimony on record
Doesn't mean it is under Best Evidence RUle, because it personal knowledge
55
# Rule 1004 If original is lost or destoryed
testimony concerning the contents od the writing is admissible