UE Special Tests Flashcards

1
Q

Elbow - valgus stress test

A

Pht

  • Facing pt
  • Proximal hand: on lateral aspect of distal humerus or joint line
  • Distal hand: hold distal F/A (in full supination)
  • Tested at different angle of elbow extension-flexion
  • Pht apply a valgus stress by turning your torso

Findings:

  • Gr I sprain: No gap, normal EF & pain
  • Gr II sprain: Gap, normal EF & pain
  • Gr III sprain: Gap, soft EF with more or less pain

Position:
-Pt supine, Pht facing pt (Hold 5 sec)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Elbow - varus stress test

A

Pht
- Proximal hand: on medial joint line or distal humerus

  • Distal hand: hold distal F/A (in full supination)
  • Tested at different position of elbow extension & flexion
  • Pht apply a varus stress by turning your torso

Findings:

  • Gr I sprain: No gap, normal EF & pain
  • Gr II sprain: Gap, normal EF & pain
  • Gr III sprain: Gap, soft EF with more or less pain

Position:
-Pt supine, Pht facing pt (Hold 5 sec)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elbow - lateral epicondylitis (passive test)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Elbow - lateral epicondylitis (active test)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Elbow - lateral epicondylitis (differential tissue test)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elbow - medial epicondylitis (passive and active test)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

wrist - distal ru ligament stress test

A

Findings:
Gr I sprain: Strong normal EF & pain

Gr II sprain: Solid Firm EF but much further into range & P

Gr III sprain: Sluggish or NO EF with more or less pain

Position:

  • Pt seated
  • Pht facing pt, look for NZ, EF & pain; hold 5sec
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

wrist - RCL and LCL ligament stress test

A

Wrist collateral ligaments
Pt: wrist in extension (just out of CPP)

Pht:

  • One hand: stabilize distal radius/ulna
  • One hand: grasps proximal & distal rows of carpal bones

Findings:
Gr I sprain: Strong normal EF & pain

Gr II sprain: Solid Firm EF but much further into range & P

Gr III sprain: Sluggish or NO EF with more or less pain

Position:

  • Pt seated
  • Pht facing pt, look for NZ, EF & pain; hold 5sec
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

wrist MCP collateral ligaments stress tests

A

Findings:
Gr I sprain: Strong normal EF & pain

Gr II sprain: Solid Firm EF but much further into range & P

Gr III sprain: Sluggish or NO EF with more or less pain

Position:

  • Pt seated
  • Pht facing pt, look for NZ, EF & pain; hold 5sec
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

finger DIP and PIP collateral ligament stress tests

A

Findings:
Gr I sprain: Strong normal EF & pain

Gr II sprain: Solid Firm EF but much further into range & P

Gr III sprain: Sluggish or NO EF with more or less pain

Position:

  • Pt seated
  • Pht facing pt, look for NZ, EF & pain; hold 5sec
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

wrist - finkelstein test

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

wrist - TFCC supination lift test

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

wrist - TFCC ulnar impaction test

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

wrist - TFCC load test

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

F/A - Phalen test

A

wrist flexion for 60s (+ for CTS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

F/A - Durkan’s median nerve test

A
  • direct compression at CT, hold pressure 30 s, most sensitive test
    • for CTS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

F/A tinel’s sign

A
  • tapping at a certain point to see if S&S are reproduced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

F/A - pronator teres syndrome test

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

F/A compression tests for PTS

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

F/A pinch grip test for AINs

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

F/A froment’s sign for CUTS

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

F/A - pressure provocation test for CUTS

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

F/A - elbow flexion test for CUTS

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

F/A - Froment’s sign for GUTS

26
F/A - provocative tests for RATS
33
F/A - Allen's test for GUTS
- test for vascular flow 1) pt makes fist (both hands) 2) compress artery 3) pt opens fingers 4) see if blood returns at = rate
34
GH joint ROM/OP - Apley scratch test
35
GH joint ROM/OP - HBB test
36
GH joint: antero-superior HBB with ER
37
GH joint: apprehension test
38
GH joint: relocation test
\* to be done with apprehension test!!
39
GH joint - sulcus sign test
40
GH joint - posterior apprehension test
41
GH joint - compression rotation test
Better diagnostic utility when using specific combination of 3 tests: 1) By selecting 2 highly sensitive tests (true positive) - Compression rotation test - O’Brien test 2) And 1 highly specific test (true negative) - Biceps load II User can be fairly confident in both ruling out & in SLAP lesions
42
GH joint - O'Brien's test
Better diagnostic utility when using specific combination of 3 tests: 1) By selecting 2 highly sensitive tests (true positive) - Compression rotation test - O’Brien test 2) And 1 highly specific test (true negative) - Biceps load II User can be fairly confident in both ruling out & in SLAP lesions
43
GH joint - biceps load 2 test
Better diagnostic utility when using specific combination of 3 tests: 1) By selecting 2 highly sensitive tests (true positive) - Compression rotation test - O’Brien test 2) And 1 highly specific test (true negative) - Biceps load II User can be fairly confident in both ruling out & in SLAP lesions
44
GH joint - Hawkin's-Kennedy test
Both Hawkins-Kennedy & Neer tests would be minimally helpful for both ruling in & out subacromial impingement The presence of a painful arc during elevation may additionally be helpful in identifying impingement Impingement would not identify which structure is at fault would only identify which movt/mechanism is at fault
45
GH joint - Neer's impingement test
Both Hawkins-Kennedy & Neer tests would be minimally helpful for both ruling in & out subacromial impingement The presence of a painful arc during elevation may additionally be helpful in identifying impingement Impingement would not identify which structure is at fault would only identify which movt/mechanism is at fault
46
GH joint - posterior impingement test
Both Hawkins-Kennedy & Neer tests would be minimally helpful for both ruling in & out subacromial impingement The presence of a painful arc during elevation may additionally be helpful in identifying impingement Impingement would not identify which structure is at fault would only identify which movt/mechanism is at fault
47
GH joint - full can test
Remember: Special tests done - To isolate the involved structure - Help to confirm the diagnosis - But the result of a single test is usually not enough
48
GH joint - empty can test
Remember: Special tests done - To isolate the involved structure - Help to confirm the diagnosis - But the result of a single test is usually not enough
49
GH joint - drop arm test
Remember: Special tests done - To isolate the involved structure - Help to confirm the diagnosis - But the result of a single test is usually not enough
50
GH joint - external rotation lag sign (ERLS)
Remember: Special tests done - To isolate the involved structure - Help to confirm the diagnosis - But the result of a single test is usually not enough
51
GH joint - internal rotation lag sign
Remember: Special tests done - To isolate the involved structure - Help to confirm the diagnosis - But the result of a single test is usually not enough
52
GH sup lig stress test
Pt supine Pht Medial hand: Stabilizes scapula superiorly by applying a gentle pressure on the coracoid process Lateral hand: Grasps proximal humerus
53
GH mid lig stress test
Pt supine Pht Medial hand: Stabilizes scapula superiorly by applying a gentle pressure on the coracoid process Lateral hand: Grasps proximal humerus
54
GH inf lig stress test (ant segment)
## Footnote Pt supine Pht Medial hand: Stabilizes scapula superiorly by applying a gentle pressure on the coracoid process Lateral hand: Grasps proximal humerus
55
GH inf lig stress test (post segment)
56
Posterior GH ligaments stress tests
57
stability test trapezoid ligament
58
stability test conoid ligament
59
AC joint special tests
60
SC joint syability test (compression test)
61
SC joint syability test (anterior stability)
62
ST joint - 4-point palpation
63
Dynamic Scapula Test (abd elevation test)
To assess when Pt’s symptoms are produced in abduction & Scapula dysfunction is present Pht corrects scapula position - Stand behind your pt on the side of the shoulder being assessed - Place one hand anteriorly over the acromion (your arm is between the pt’s arm and their body) - The other hand is on the scapula posteriorly - Correct the observed dysfunction (Eg: if the pt’s scapula is not upwardly rotating, create the upward rotation of the scapula with your hands) - Ask pt to repeat GH abduction as you correct the scapula position & guide the scapula through abduction \*Be aware not to block GH ROM as you are doing the correction q (+)ve test: Improve ROM or reduced pain
64
Dynamic Scapula Test (ER scapula stability test)
65
Scapula stability test (Kibler’s lateral slide - lateral scapula slide test)
66
GH joint - speeds test
PT puts arm at 90 deg flex, full sup (ER) and full elbow ext. manual resistance applied down. + if pain in bicipital tendon/groove. means SLAP or bicipital tendonitis.