Uned 2 Flashcards

(62 cards)

1
Q

What is an aim in research?

A

A statement of what the researcher(s) intend to find out in a research study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a confounding variable?

A

Any variable which varies systematically with the independent variable that might potentially affect the dependent variable and thereby confound the results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does it mean to debrief participants?

A

To inform the participants of the true nature of the study and to restore them to the same state they were in at the start of the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a dependent variable?

A

The variable measured by the experimenter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an experiment?

A

A research method where causal conclusions can be drawn because an independent variable has been deliberately manipulated to observe the causal effect on the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a hypothesis?

A

A precise and testable statement about the assumed relationship between variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an independent variable (IV)?

A

Some event that is directly manipulated by an experimenter in order to test its effect on another variable - the dependent variable (DV).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean to operationalise a variable?

A

Ensuring that variables are in a form that can be easily tested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are standardised procedures?

A

A set of procedures that are the same for all participants in order to be able to repeat the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Directional and non-directional Hypothesis

A
  • Directional - people who have plentiful sleep have higher marks in class tests than people with a lower sleep average
  • Non-directional - people who have plentiful sleep have different marks on class tests thatn people with a lower sleep average

Use directional when past research suggests that those will be the findings, non - directional when no past research has been done

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Null Hypothesis

A
  • statement of no effect
  • ‘there is no difference in the marks between…’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a confounding variable?

A

A variable that is not the independent variable (IV) under study but varies systematically with the IV, potentially affecting the dependent variable and rendering the outcome meaningless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does control refer to in research?

A

The extent to which any variable is held constant or regulated by a researcher.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is external validity?

A

The degree to which a research finding can be generalized to other settings, groups of people, and over time.
* Place research was conducted
* people who are studied
* historical period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are extraneous variables?

A

Have an effect on the dependent variable, make it more difficult to detect a significant effect because other factors have an influence.

for example, some people have better memories, higher iq.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is internal validity?

A
  • Whether the IV produced the change in DV or did something else like a confounding variable
  • Whether the researcher tested what she or he intended to test
  • Whether the study possessed or lacked mundane realism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does mundane realism refer to?

A

How a study mirrors the real world, indicating the realism of the research environment.
Lack of mundane realism = not like everydau experience, results of study may not be very useful

Need realism to be able to generalise results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is validity in research?

A

Refers to whether an observed effect is a genuine one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Types of Experimental Designs

A

Repeated measures
* all participants receive all levels of the IV
* e.g each participant does task with TV on, then do similar task a week later with TV off, then compare performance
* Independent groups
* participants placed in seperate groups, each group does one level of IV
* e.g Group A does task with TV on, Group B with TV off, compare performance of two groups
* Matched pairs
* 2 groups of participants but match on key characteristics believed to have an effect on the DV
* matched characteristics must be relevant to the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Disadvantages - Repeated measures

A
  • order of conditions may affect performance - may do beter on the second test because of practice effect, or less anxious. Some do worse because of being bored with doing the same test again
  • When doing second, may guedd the purpose of the experiment - may effect behaviour
  • Dealing
  • May use 2 different tests to reduce a practice effect - though must be equivalent
  • Deal with order effects with use of counterbalancing
  • cover story can be presented about purpose of test to avoid participants guessing the aims of the study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Disadvantages - Independent groups

A
  • Researcher cannot control the effects of participant variables - e.g group A may have better memories than Group B (this would be a confounding variable)
  • needs more participants
  • Dealing
  • Randomly allocate participants to conditions which distribute them evenly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Disadvantages - matched pairs

A
  • Very time consuming and difficult to match participants on key variables
  • Not possible to control all participant variables, can only match what is known to be relevant
  • Dealing
  • Restrict the number of variables to match to make it easier
    Conduct a pilot study to consider key variables that might be important when matching
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Counterbalancing

A

Ensures that each condition in a repeated measures design is tested first or second in equal amounts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Location of research

A
  • Laboratory
  • most scientific way
  • room equipped to allow scientific research and measurement
  • research tends to be experimental, observational research
  • Field
  • outside laboratory, more natural setting
  • e.g shopping cnetre, hospitals
  • Online
  • researchers able to access participant via the internet
  • questionnaires
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Evaluate - in a laboratory
* **Advantages** * allow researchers to measure research variables more easily, making it easier to control confounding or extraneous variables, easier for others to replicate * equipment e.e Raine et al - PET Scans * **Disadvantages** * may cause participants to demonstrate artificial behaviour - surrounding reminds them they are taking part in a piece of research, must be on best behaviour * some cannot be conducted in lab because of the nature of the bahvour being researched
26
Evaluate - In the field
* **Advantages** * useful to minimise the artificial nature of research - everyday environment = less likely to be aware of their participation * allows to examine behaviour in a range of contexts - not possible in lab * **Disadvantages** * more difficult to measure research variables, and control confounding or extraneous variables * replicate - might get different findings because of differences in settings * difficult to get all equipment
27
Evaluate - online
* **Advantages** * ability to access large group of participants - allow to seek out a diverse sample, less culturally biased * cost effective - use free, cheap software - can quickly put info on internet * Data analysis is quicker * **Disadvantages** * methods tends to be limited - surveys, questionnaires * Trends tend to be infrequent * Ethical issues - consent, protection from risk of harm * difficult to debrief
28
Quasi-experiments
* 2 types - with an IV (Natural), with no IV (difference studies)
29
Quasi-experiments - Natural Experiments
* conducted when it isn't possible for ethical or practical reasons to deliberately manipulate an IV * IV varies naturally, DV may be tested in a lab * **e.g** - before 1995 people in St Helena had no TV, arrival of TV gave researchers a chance to see how esxposure to Western programmes might influence their behaviour - Charlton et al found no difference. - IV not controlled by researchers, natural
30
Quasi-experiments - Difference Studies
* IV is naturally occurring and DV may be measured in a lab * IV has not been made to vary by anyone * **e.g**- Sheridan and King tested obedience by asking male participants to give electric shocs of increasing advantage to a puppy - 54% delivered maximum shock, obedience rate for females 100% - IV=gender, difference that cannot be manipulated
31
Evaluation of Quasi-experiments
* **Manipulation of IV** * lack of control over IV means we cannot say for certain that change in DV is caused by IV * **Random allocation** * not possible to randomly allocate participants to conditions in a quasi-experiment = may be biases in the different groups = may be uncontrolled confounding variables * **Unique characteristics of participants** * sample may have unique characteristics = findings cannot be generalised to other groups of people
32
Demand characteristics
* in an experiment participants are unsure what to do and how to behave so they look for clues on how to behave in that situations * The clues are the demand characteristics - convey the hypothesis * participants guess what the research is looing for and tend to behave in a certain way to get a certain result * result - participant don't behave as they would usually
33
Researcher bias
* information from a researcher that encourages certain behaviours in the participant which might lead to a fulfilment of the investigator's expectations * e.g - ask a question that leads a participant to give the answer the investigator wants
34
Dealing with Demand characteristics and researcher bias
* **Single blind design** * participants are not aware of the research aim and of which conditions of the experiment they are receiving. * Prevents participant from seeking cues about the aims * **Double blind design** * participants and the person conducting the experiment are blind to the aims and hypothesis. * Conductor less likely to produce cues about what they expect * **Experimental realism** * participant pays attention to the task and not the fact they are being observed
35
Opportunity sampling
* Recruit people who are most convenient or available - e.g students at your school, people walking by on the street * **Advantage** * easiest method, just use the first suitable participants you can find * Take less time to locate sample * **Disadvantage** * biased - sample is frawn from a small part of the target population
36
Random sampling
* Lottery method, random number generators * **Advantage** * unbiased - all members of the target population have an equal chance of selection * **Disadvantage** * Need to have a list of all members of the target population and then contact all those selected * Takes a lot of time
37
Snowball sample
* Current participants recruit further participants from among people they know. Thus the sample group appears to grow like a snowball * **Advantage** * Enables researcher to locate groups of people who are difficult to access, such as drug addicts * **Disadvantage** * The sample is not likely to be a good cross-selection of the population because it is friends of friends
38
Self-selected sampling
* Advertise in a newspaper or on internet * **Advantage** * Gives acess to a variety of participants - make the sample more representative and less biased * **Disadvantage** * Sample is biased - participants are likely to be more highly motivated to be helpful, extra time on hands * Volunteer bias
39
Stratified and quota sampling
* Subgroups within a target population are identified, participants are obtained from each of the srata in proportion to their occurrene in the target population * for a stratified sample selection - using random technique * quota sample selection - using non-random technique * **Advantage** * Likely to be more representative because there is a proportional representation of the sub-groups * **Disadvantage** * Very time-consuming to identify subgroups and select participants and contact them
40
Systematic sampling
* use a predetermined system to select participants - numerical interval is applied * **Advantage** - unbiased as participants are selected using an objective system * **Disadvantage** - Not truly unbiased/random unless you select a number using a random method and start with this person, then select every nth person.
41
Working with animals
* Research is governed by legislation such as the Animals Act 1986 * Strict requirements for the ethical treatment of animals: * avoid or at least minimise discomfort to living animals * asked to consider alternatives to using animals - such as computer simulations * if using the is unavoidable - strict recommendations about factors such as the species type, care requirements ...
42
Working with vulnerable individuals (including children)
* BPS considers vulnerable populations to include - children under 16yo, people with learning or communication difficulties, patients in care, people in custody or probation, people engaged in illegal activities * valid consent needs to be obtained from the person legally responsibly for the individual - may not fully understnd
43
Risk to the participants' values, beliefs, relationships, status, or privacy
* psychologists have to consider the impact that their research may have on the participants * ensure that their attitudes and opinions are not demeaned, their associations with other people are not damaged
44
Types of observation
* **non-participant** - observer watches the behaviour of others from a distance and doesn't interact with the people being observed * **Participant** - observer is part of the group being observed
45
Structuring observations
* **unsturctured** - researcher records all relevant behaviour but has no system * **structured** - systems to organise observations: using behavioural categories and sampling procedures * **Behavioural categories** - breaks up stream of behaviour into different behavioural categories, what is needed is operationalised * **Sampling procedures** - Event sampling: counting number of times a certain behaviour occurs, Time sampling: recording behaviours in a given time frame
46
Evaluation of observational techniques
* what people say they do is often different from what they actually do, observations give a different take on behaviour than other research methods * observer bias is a serious issue * non-participant observers are likely to be more objective * Participant observation may provide special insights * Sampling methods make the task of observing behaviour more manageable * time sampling may no alwayd represent what is happening
47
Self-report techniques
* **Questionnaires** * set of written questions - collect information abou ta topic * permit researcher to discover what people think and feel **Interviews** * Structured - has pre-determined questions, conducted in real time * Semi-structured - has less structure, new questions are developed during the course of the interview, develop based on the answers given
48
Types of questions
* **Closed** - * range of possible answers is fixed: listing possible answers for them to choose from * easier to analyse, but forced to select answers that don't represent their real thoughts * produce quantitative data * **Open** * infinite range of possible answers * produce qualitative data - more difficult to summarise
49
Evaluation - self-report techniques
* +, allow access to what people think and feel * -, people may not supply truthful answers, social desirability bias - answer lacks validity * -, sample may lack representativeness - data cannot be generalised
50
Evaluation - questionnaire
* +, can be distributed to large numbers of people, cheap and quick. - enables to collect data from a large sample of people * +, respondents may feel more willing to reveal personal info than in an interview * +. reduce social desirability bias * -, only filled by people who can read and write and are willing to spend time filling them in = biased
51
Evaluation - Interviews
* **Structured** - * +, easily repeated as questions are standardised = answers from different people can be compared, easier to analyse * -, if the interviewer behaves differently to other interviewers or at different occasions - low reliability * -, interviewers may influence the answers the repondent gives * **semi-structured** - * +, more detailed info can be obtained * -, require interviewer with more skill = more expensive
52
Correlational Studies
* correlation is a systematic association between two continuous variables * positive correlation - two variables increase together * negative correlation - one variable increases the other decreases * zero correlation - no relationship between the two
53
Correlational hypothesis
* states the expected association between the co-variables
54
Evaluation - correlational studies
* **Disadvantages** * jump to causal conclusions - misinterpretation may mean that people design programmes for improvement based on false premises * intervening variables * may lack internal and external validity, and generalisability * **Advantages** * used to investigated trends in data * can easily be repeated again = findings can be confirmed
55
Content analysis and evaluation
* form of indirect observation * has high ecological validity as it is based on observations of what people actually do * Findings can be replicated * observer bias
56
Case study and evaluation
* involves the detailed study of a single individual, institution, or event * uses info from a range of sources * Many techniques used - interviews, observations, questionnaires, IQ tests * offer rich, in-depth data so info overlooked is likely to be identified * useful to investigate human behaviour and experience * difficult to generalise from individual cases * involve recollection of past events - unreliable
57
Different kinds of data
* **Nominal** * Data are in seperate categories, grouping people * **Ordinal** * data are ordered, list in order of liking * **Interval** * data are measured using units of equal intervals * **Ratio** * There is a true zero point
58
Display of quantitative data
* Tables * Frequency table * Bar chart * Histogram * Line graph * Pie chart * Scatter diagram
59
Quantitative data
* represents how much, how long, how many * DV, closed questions * numerical info * data which can be measured * looking at averages and differences * easy to analyse and draw conclusions * may oversimplify reality = conclusions meaningless
60
Qualitative data
* can't be counted * open questions * deals with descriptions * provide detailed info which can provide unexpected insights to thoughts and behaviour * difficult to analyse and draw conclusions
61
Primary data
* information observed or collected directly from first-hand experience * collected by researcher for the study currently made * involve designing the study, gaining ethical approval, piloting the study, testing participants, analyse data, draw conclusions. or questionnaire, observation * researcher has contol over the data * data collection can be designed so it fits the aims and hypothesis of the study * Very lengthy and expensive process
62
Secondary data
* information that was collected for a pupose other than th current one * use of government statistics, data held by hospital * correlation study, review studies and meta-analysis use secondary data * simpler to access someone else's data * cheaper, less time and equipment needed * the data may not fit the needs of the study