Unit 1 Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

What did the population of India look like in 1914?

A

300 million
- 70% Hindu
- 20% Muslim (largest minority)
- other minorities = Sikhs, Christians
- built on a caste system, untouchables = the lowest caste

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did British rule of India look like by 1914?

A
  • Britain exported manufactured commodities to India, allowing British industries to prosper but impacting Indian ones e.g. tariffs on Lancashire cotton were removed in 1879, impacting Indian cotton
  • 1/10 of British overseas investment was in India (£360 mill)
  • British presence in India secured by the Indian Army (250,000 - one of the largest volunteer armies at the time, second only to the British army)
  • ran India through the Indian Civil Service (exams held in London in English so mostly inaccessible to Indians)
  • British Raj officials = wealthy, treated as superior, sent their children back to
    England for boarding school
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some examples of British ‘divide and rule’ policies pre-1914?

A

1905 Partition of Bengal (rescinded in 1911, initially to curb influence of Bengali politicians but fuelled nationalist sentiment and the swadeshi movt AND set a precedent for partition being a ‘solution’ the British were willing to try).
- 1909 Indian Councils Act (implemented by Sec of State Morley and Viceroy Minto, separate electorates + increased Indian representation in councils)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Indians express support for WWl?

A
  • 27 largest princely states gave use of their armies to Britain
  • INC and ML offered support, Gandhi urged people to enlist
  • 1918: 827,000 Indians enlisted (on top of those in the army already)
  • reason for loyalty = sense of Britain as ‘mother country’ (cited the king in
    letters), joining soldier caste etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was India’s military contribution to WW1 (and the impact of it)?

A
  • 1.5 million combatant and non-combatant roles
  • 184,000 animals
  • useful for fighting in Middle East due to suitable climate and proximity to supplies from India (but poorly led/equipped, surrendered to Turkish in April 1916)
  • IMPACT = 60,000 died, 65,000 injured (greater than all other Imperial impacts and more dead than USA)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was India’s economic contribution to WW1

A
  • £146 million from Indian revenue went towards the war (1/2 as loans)
  • 3.7 million tonnes of military supplies produced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the economic impact of India’s contribution to WW1?

A

POSITIVE
- industries such as cotton/ iron/ chemicals expanded to replace imported goods
- shareholder dividends skyrocketed e.g. by 24% for Bombay cloth mills
(1914-17)

NEGATIVE
- price of grain rose by 93%, of domestic goods by 60%, of imported goods by 90%
- combined with no monsoon in 1918-19, there were grain shortages and famine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the social impact of WWl on India?

A
  • sporadic outbreaks of petty violence/ rioting
  • support for Raj crumbled and grew for independence.
  • turned Congress into a more radical group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the environment globally and in Britain post-war (1917/18)?

A

anti-imperialist shift:
- Bolshevik revolution
- Wilson’s 14 points (anti imperialist programme for world peace)
- Balfour Declaration (est. “home for Jewish people”)
- Britain: WW1 nearly bankrupted them (less keen to look after the colonies), liberals voted in, 1918 universal suffrage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What dilemma did the war create for the British in India?

A
  • most Indians were looking for increased self-governance as a result of their loyalty
  • British couldn’t ignore own belief in democracy BUT wanted to preserve Raj
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the Montagu Declaration

A
  • Montagu = liberal Sec. of State for India, believed in greater self-gov
    for India
  • 20th August 1917, announcement delivered to HoC
  • outlined his plans for increasing Indian participation in self-governance and administration of India
  • NO timescale, dual government (Britain still maintaining control) not independence - Raj always one step behind nationalist demands
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the Rowlatt Acts and why were they introduced?

A
  • extension of wartime martial law (1915 Defence of India Act) introduced in March 1919
  • to control increased revolutionary turbulence (Punjab, Bombay and Bengal)
  • legalised imprisonment without trial for up to 2 years, trial without a jury, censorship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the initial Indian reaction to the Rowlatt Acts?

A
  • all 22 Indian members of the legislative council opposed (but were outvoted)
  • Jinnah (wrote furious letter to Chelmsford accusing Raj -> irresponsible) and several colleagues resigned from council
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened in the build up to Amritsar?

A
  • in response to the Rowlatt Acts, Gandhi called for satyagraha + hartals were organised in most of India’s provinces (Hindu-Muslim coalition) BUT failed because they weren’t strictly observed and erupted into violence in Gujarat and Punjab (showed satyagraha only worked if everyone understood its tenets + was committed)
  • 10 April: 2 organisers arrested - riots - anti-Raj protests (3 Europeans killed, Marcia Sherwood brutally assaulted)
  • 1l April: over 100 British women + children take refuge in Gobindgarh Fort, British lose control of Amritsar
  • Gov O’Dwyer is convinced the riots = planned uprising so sends General Dyer in with 1000 soldiers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the Amritsar Massacre?

A
  • 13 April 1919 = religious day, thousands worshipping at the Golden Temple 4) in Jallainwala Bagh
  • Dyer bans meetings + sets a curfew, 10,000 ignore this and gather in Jallainwala Bagh, condemning Rowlatt Acts
  • no warning + no ability to escape when Dyer + troops appear and fire 1650 rounds of bullets for 10 mins
  • 400 killed, 1500 wounded
  • Dyer then est. marital law in Amritsar, Indians had to salaam to Europeans + Crawling Order on road where Marcia Sherwood had been assaulted.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the response to Amritsar?

A
  • Indians - deep anger towards Raj
  • Punjab section of INC publish own report, 1700 witness + graphic photos, savage indictment of the Raj
  • divided public + political opinion in Britain: Commons censured Dyer on 8 July but Lords supported Dyer (19 July), the “Ladies of Punjab” expressed their gratitude and his entire garrison cheered him
  • Montagu condemned event as terrorism - Hunter Commission in Nov which heard evidence of Dyer’s brutality, censured him and forced him to resign
17
Q

What was the 1919 Government of India Act?

A
  • Montagu-Chelmsford reforms = reforms for India by Montagu and ViceroyChelmsford, building on 1917 Montagu declaration
  • put into law with the 1919 Government of India Act (Dec)
  • introduced dyarchy
  • provincial and legislative councils enlarged
  • franchise was extended based on tax payments to 1 in 10 men but only 1% of women were enfranchised.
  • separate electorates for ALL minority groups (DIVIDE AND RULE)
  • Viceroy’s council had to have 3 Indians out of 6 members
18
Q

Describe dyarchy in India after the 1919 Government of India Act?

A

Central responsibilities (British only - appointed)
- defence and foreign affairs
- tax (income, salt, customs, duties)
- postal communications and railways

Provincial responsibilities (shared)
Reserved matters (British provincial governors and executive council
- appointed)
- land revenue
- law and justice
- police
- irrigation
- labour

Transferred matters (Indian provincial ministers and legislative council
- elected)
- local self-govt
- education
- health
- works + agriculture

19
Q

What was the Indian reaction to the Government of India Act?

A
  • Many Hindus hated idea of ‘reserved’ seats, believing them to be divisive and undemocratic
  • bitterly disappointed those hoping for home rule
  • contrast between rapid passage of Rowlatt Acts (repression) and the 2 years between Montagu Declaration and 1919 Gol Act (concessions) seemed to show true priorities of the Raj
  • Rowlatt Acts very nearly wrecked the Gol Act as Congress boycotted the first elections held under the 1919 Act
20
Q

What is the INC

A
  • founded in 1885, it began as a forum for debate amongst privileged high a i case Hindus (but also included Muslims)
  • transformed into India’s largest political party (began w/ Partition of Bengal but then transformed with emergence of Gandhi)
21
Q

Who was Gandhi and how did he rise to prominence?

A
  • began as a lawyer in South Africa but then returned to India in 1914 and pivoted to becoming a peasant leader as he developed his satyagraha ideology (non-violent non-cooperation) to aim for swaraj
  • radical conservative: believed in the caste system and supported the war effort
  • 1917: intervened in local situations e.g. fasted to protest the low pay of cotton mill workers in Ahmedabad, and formed useful relationships e.g. with rising Nehru + muslims and businessmen (2 groups ignored by Congress - muslims later supported his takeover at 1920 Nagpur Congress and businessmen bankrolled his non-cooperation campaign)
22
Q

What was the Muslim League?

A
  • founded in 1906
  • originally an anti-Congress body to represent Muslims
  • but did end up working with Congress in the early period
23
Q

Why did Muslims want separate electorates?

A

they were still minorities in most states and would be outvoted + disenfranchised in a democracy

24
Q

What are some examples of Muslims and Hindus forming a coalition against the Raj between 1914-20?

A
  • 1916 Lucknow Pact
  • 1915, Muslim League and Congress held sessions in Bombay committing themselves to objective of self gov
  • 1920 Nagpur Congress: muslims supported Gandhi’s takeover of Congress
25
How did cooperation for the Lucknow Pact come about?
1913: ML included separation from the Raj in their aims, bringing them closer to Congress - resentment: Britain declared war on Ottoman Empire in 1914 -> Sultan =Muslim Caliph - Jinnah worked to bring about the rapprochement on shared aim of self-govt
26
What was the LucknowPact and what was agreed?
- 1916 alliance signed between Congress (led by Tilak) and the Muslim League (led by Jinnah). - it promised separate electorates for all communities and the number of muslims in the provincial legislatures being lain down province by province in return for working together towards self-government
27
What was the significance of the Lucknow Pact?
- peak of Hindu-Muslim relations - strengthened the Indian nationalist movt. - provided the same benefits for Muslims that the 1909 Indian Councils Act did BUT Jinnah did not like the increased sense of Islamic identity created by separate electorates. - radical Tilak's return healed rifts between the radical and moderate wings of Congress, thus strengthening it - led to Congress issuing a resolution urging the British to state that their aim was self-govt. for India
28
What were the home rule leagues?
- home rule = Indians running domestic affairs whilst remaining a colony (British = defence and foreign policy), the leagues brought this concept to the masses - Bal Tilak's HR league: 32,000 members - Annie Besant's HR league: grew slowly but had a network of committees that covered most of India, Jinnah joined. - they toured widely, gave public lectures + used media and joined each others leagues. - members of Congress and ML members
29
What was the impact of the home rule leagues?
- hundreds of thousands signed petitions demanding home rule - spread political awareness in unpolitical areas, laying the groundwork for Gandhis non-cooperation movt. - Raj = concerned, arrested Tilak for sedition + made him pay 40,000 rupees, Besant was arrested in June 1917, but both of these only increased support
30
'Indian contribution to the Raj in the years 1914-18 was successful' HFDYA**
criteria: positive/negative, widespread, long term, transformative, fundamental factors: military and economic contribution, socioeconomic impacts (positives), socio-economic impacts (negatives) argument: yes, in the long term as well as allowing wartime success (fundamental). however, significant immediate negative impacts in India, especially among individuals? limited success
31
the main consequence of wwl was a weakening of British control in the subcontinent in the years 1914-19'HFDYA
criteria: unprecedented, widespread, long term, transformative factors: agree- weakening via concessions, agree- growth of nationalism, disagree- still maintained control, as shown via repressive measures?other factors? argument: agree long term, as main consequence = growth in nationalism, which weakened British authority (hence concessions) and thus resulted in repression. however, British ultimately remained powerful as controlled these concessions so perhaps more of a turning point to long term weakness than immediate
32
'How accurate is it to say that the Indian HR leagues, in the years 1916-19, were largely successful?'
criteria: unprecedented, widespread, long term, transformative factors: success of HR leagues, no - Amritsar massacre, no/limited - GOl act argument: in years 1916-19, success = limited as shown via Raj's repression and lack of significant/extensive reform, as well as 'divide and rule'. however, did have major long term success in terms of educating population and growing support for self gov, particularly significant in later campaigns etc
33
'TWE did wwl weaken the British imperial grip on India?'***
criteria: unprecedented, widespread, long term, transformative, catalyst/ sparked factors: wwl (economic crisis, riots, political consequences e.g. GOl act), growth pf nationalism, Amritsar massacre argument: to a large extent as exemplified how Britain took advantage of India and sparked growth of nationalism and anti raj sentiments, hence 'need' for repression, reform and 'divide and rule’
34
'the constitutional reforms brought by the GOl act of 1919 failed to satisfy the demands of Indian nationalists' HFDYA?' ****
criteria: unprecedented, widespread, long term, transformative factors: agree-Congress and Gandhi's reaction, agree - lack of consequence/ British response and continual use of repression, disagree - long term potential/ committed to eventual self gov/some nationalistic success argument: agree, as British seen as repressive, divide and rule and out of touch, esp considering 4yrs to make. exemplified by Gandhis and congress response